scholarly journals Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: Cardiac Computed Tomography Findings and Clinical Outcomes After Aortic Valve Replacement

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Se Jin Choi ◽  
Yura Ahn ◽  
Hyun Jung Koo ◽  
Dae-Hee Kim ◽  
Soyeon Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Old Age ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Aortic Annulus ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
High Gradient

Abstract Aortic valve calcium scoring by cardiac computed tomographic (CT) has been recommended as an alternative to classify the AS severity, but it is unclear that whether CT findings can predict and have prognostic implication in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LF-LG AS), which has fewer benefit from surgery among the AS subtypes. In this study, we examined the clinical and cardiac CT findings of LF-LG AS patients and evaluated factors affecting outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). This study included 511 (66.9±8.8 years, 55% men) consecutive patients with severe AS who underwent surgical AVR. Aortic valve area (AVA) was obtained by echocardiography (AVAecho) and by CT (AVACT) using each modalities measurement of the left ventricular outflow tract. Patients with AS were classified as 1) high-gradient severe (n=438), 2) classic LF-LG (n=18), and 3) paradoxical LF-LG (n=55) based on echocardiography. Classic LF-LG AS patients had higher end-systolic and end-diastolic volume indices, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, larger AVAecho and AVACT, and larger aortic annulus compared to high-gradient severe AS (P<0.05, for all). In classic LF-LG AS group, 27.8% of patients presented AVACT≥1.2 cm2. After multivariable adjustment, old age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04, P=0.049), high B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) (HR, 1.005; P<0.001), preoperative atrial fibrillation (HR, 2.75; P=0.003), classic LF-LG AS (HR, 5.53, P=0.004), and small aortic annulus (HR, 0.57; P=0.002) were independently associated with major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). The classic LF-LG AS group presented larger AVACT and aortic annulus than those in high-gradient severe AS group and one third of them had AVACT ≥1.2 cm2. Old age, high BNP, atrial fibrillation, classic LF-LG AS, and small aortic annulus were associated with MACCE in severe AS patients after surgical AVR.

scholarly journals prognostic evaluation of patients benefiting from a trans aortic valve replacement according to the type of aortic stenosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Lacout ◽  
C David ◽  
A Bernard ◽  
C Saint Etienne ◽  
JM Clerc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Normal Flow ◽  
High Gradient ◽  
Normal Lvef

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Aortic Stenosis (AS) is a common condition in patients over 75 years.  Latest ESC recommendations differentiate 4 types of AS according to: Indexed Stroke Volume (SVi), mean gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The aim of our study is to evaluate prognosis of patients who have had a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), in terms of mortality, according  to the 4 types of AS. Methods This study compares prognosis of 620 patients who had TAVR between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018. Patients were classified into 4 groups according to AS type: high gradient; low gradient, low flow, low LVEF; low gradient, low flow, normal LVEF; low gradient, normal flow. Results 69 patients (11.1%) died within 12 months of the procedure: 49 in the high gradient group (9.4%); 13 in the low gradient, low flow, low LVEF group (47.1%); 1 in the low gradient, low flow, normal LVEF group (5%); 6 in the low gradient, normal flow, normal LVEF group (18.2%). All-cause mortality at one year follow-up is higher in low-gradient, low-flow, altered LVEF group (p = 0.0004) than in other groups. Patients in this group were significantly more often admitted for heart failure than patients in high-gradient group (p = 0.009). Conclusion A complete echocardiography evaluation is needed to evaluate AS, its severity and type. Patients in the low gradient, low flow, low LVEF group have an independent risk of mortality at 12 months higher than other groups and are more hospitalized than patients in the high gradient group.

True-severe stenosis in paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis: outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taishi Okuno ◽  
Noé Corpataux ◽  
Giancarlo Spano ◽  
Christoph Gräni ◽  
Dik Heg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
High Gradient ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve

Abstract Aims The ESC/EACTS guidelines propose criteria that determine the likelihood of true-severe aortic stenosis (AS). We aimed to investigate the impact of the guideline-based criteria of the likelihood of true-severe AS in patients with low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) AS with preserved ejection fraction (pEF) on outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods and results In a prospective TAVR registry, LFLG-AS patients with pEF were retrospectively categorized into high (criteria ≥6) and intermediate (criteria &lt;6) likelihood of true-severe AS. Haemodynamic, functional, and clinical outcomes were compared with high-gradient AS patients with pEF. Among 632 eligible patients, 202 fulfilled diagnostic criteria for LFLG-AS. Significant haemodynamic improvement after TAVR was observed in LFLG-AS patients, irrespective of the likelihood. Although &gt;70% of LFLG-AS patients had functional improvement, impaired functional status [New York Heart Association (NYHA III/IV)] persisted more frequently at 1 year in LFLG-AS than in high-gradient AS patients (7.8%), irrespective of the likelihood (high: 17.4%, P = 0.006; intermediate: 21.1%, P &lt; 0.001). All-cause death at 1 year occurred in 6.6% of high-gradient AS patients, 10.9% of LFLG-AS patients with high likelihood [hazard ratio (HR)adj 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68–3.02], and in 7.2% of those with intermediate likelihood (HRadj 0.92, 95% CI 0.39–2.18). Among the criteria, only the absence of aortic valve area ≤0.8 cm2 emerged as an independent predictor of treatment futility, a combined endpoint of all-cause death or NYHA III/IV at 1 year (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.14–6.25). Conclusion Patients with LFLG-AS with pEF had comparable survival but worse functional status at 1 year than high-gradient AS with pEF, irrespective of the likelihood of true-severe AS. Clinical Trial Registration https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. NCT01368250.

Aortic stenosis: current treatment options for a common condition in old age

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Tiwari ◽  
J Radvan ◽  
SC Allen
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Old Age ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Mechanical Intervention

SummaryDegenerative-calcific aortic stenosis is mainly a disease of old age. Patients with mild to moderate stenosis without symptoms and those with aortic valve sclerosis do not require mechanical intervention. There is no firm evidence that the rate of progression can be modified by medical therapies, though statins might have some effect. Patients who develop severe stenosis with symptoms have a very poor prognosis if managed medically. Surgical aortic valve replacement greatly improves symptoms and mortality rates and remains the treatment of choice for those fit for major surgery, even above the age of 80 years. For those not suitable for surgery, or who are unwilling to have an operation, outcomes can be significantly improved by trans-catheter aortic valve replacement, which has become an important option for frail elderly patients. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty improves symptoms and short-term survival, but has a less clear impact on mortality beyond 1 year. It is useful as a palliative treatment and as a bridging procedure for patients who are not ready for valve replacement. There is less agreement on the best approach to patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Trials indicate that early valve replacement results in outcomes that are comparable to those seen in symptomatic patients, though guidelines advocate delaying surgery until symptoms occur or left ventricular function begins to decline rapidly. All elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis should be considered for a mechanical intervention unless there is a properly considered reason for not doing so, or they are not willing to receive such treatment.

scholarly journals Metabolomic profiling of patients with high gradient aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Haase ◽  
Laura Bäz ◽  
Tarek Bekfani ◽  
Sophie Neugebauer ◽  
Michael Kiehntopf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Plasma Metabolites ◽  
Clinical Parameters ◽  
High Gradient ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve

Abstract Aim Aim of our study was to evaluate metabolic changes in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) before and after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and to assess whether this procedure reverses metabolomic alterations. Methods 188 plasma metabolites of 30 patients with severe high-gradient aortic valve stenosis (pre-TAVR and 6 weeks post-TAVR) as well as 20 healthy controls (HC) were quantified by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Significantly altered metabolites were then correlated to an extensive patient database of clinical parameters at the time of measurement. Results Out of the determined metabolites, 26.6% (n = 50) were significantly altered in patients with AS pre-TAVR compared to HC. In detail, 5/40 acylcarnitines as well as 10/42 amino acids and biogenic amines were mainly increased in AS, whereas 29/90 glycerophospholipids and 6/15 sphingomyelins were mainly reduced. In the post-TAVR group, 10.1% (n = 19) of metabolites showed significant differences when compared to pre-TAVR. Moreover, we found nine metabolites revealing reversible concentration levels. Correlation with clinically important parameters revealed strong correlations between sphingomyelins and cholesterol (r = 0.847), acylcarnitines and brain natriuretic peptide (r = 0.664) and showed correlation of acylcarnitine with an improvement of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (r = − 0.513) and phosphatidylcholines with an improvement of LV mass (r = − 0.637). Conclusion Metabolic profiling identified significant and reversible changes in circulating metabolites of patients with AS. The correlation of circulating metabolites with clinical parameters supports the use of these data to identify novel diagnostic as well as prognostic markers for disease screening, pathophysiological studies as well as patient surveillance.

scholarly journals Predictors of survival after aortic valve replacement in patients with low-flow and high-gradient aortic stenosis

2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 897-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Hong Ding ◽  
Yat-Yin Lam ◽  
Alison Duncan ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
Eric Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
High Gradient

scholarly journals Left Ventricular Mechanics Differ in Subtypes of Aortic Stenosis Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adil Wani ◽  
Daniel R. Harland ◽  
Tanvir K. Bajwa ◽  
Stacie Kroboth ◽  
Khawaja Afzal Ammar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Normal Flow ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve

BackgroundLeft ventricular (LV) mechanics are impaired in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). We hypothesized that there would be differences in myocardial mechanics, measured by global longitudinal strain (GLS) recovery in patients with four subtypes of severe AS after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), stratified based upon flow and gradient.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 204 patients with severe AS who underwent TAVR and were followed post-TAVR at our institution for clinical outcomes. Speckle-tracking transthoracic echocardiography was performed pre- and post-TAVR. Patients were classified as: (1) normal-flow and high-gradient, (2) normal-flow and high-gradient with reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF), (3) classical low-flow and low-gradient, or (4) paradoxical low-flow and low-gradient.ResultsBoth GLS (−13.9 ± 4.3 to −14.8 ± 4.3, P &lt; 0.0001) and LVEF (55 ± 15 to 57 ± 14%, P = 0.0001) improved immediately post-TAVR. Patients with low-flow AS had similar improvements in LVEF (+2.6 ± 9%) and aortic valve mean gradient (−23.95 ± 8.34 mmHg) as patients with normal-flow AS. GLS was significantly improved in patients with normal-flow (−0.93 ± 3.10, P = 0.0004) compared to low-flow AS. Across all types of AS, improvement in GLS was associated with a survival benefit, with GLS recovery in alive patients (mean GLS improvement of −1.07 ± 3.10, P &lt; 0.0001).ConclusionsLV mechanics are abnormal in all patients with subtypes of severe AS and improve immediately post-TAVR. Recovery of GLS was associated with a survival benefit. Patients with both types of low-flow AS showed significantly improved, but still impaired, GLS post-TAVR, suggesting underlying myopathy that does not correct post-TAVR.

scholarly journals Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) in Low Flow-Low Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis without Cardiac Reserve

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anuraj Sudhakaran ◽  
Mahek Shah ◽  
Aparna Baburaj ◽  
Brijesh Patel ◽  
Matthew Martinez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Contractile Reserve ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve

<p>With accumulating positive evidence in favour of <em>transcatheter aortic valve replacement</em> (TAVR) over a surgical <em>approach</em>, it has replaced surgical AVR to become the mainstay of treatment for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in patients with prohibitive and high surgical risk. There is significant surgical mortality and morbidity associated with surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with low flow-low gradient (LFLG) true severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) and severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (rEF) without contractile reserve (CR). CR is measured following use of dobutamine in an attempt to increase cardiac output by more than 20% while differentiating severe from pseudostenosis in some cases. The value of <em>transcatheter aortic valve replacement</em> (TAVR) over a surgical <em>approach</em> for these patients with rEF LFLG true severe AS and no CR is uncertain. We present a patient with LFLG severe AS and low left ventricular EF without contractile reserve who underwent TAVR and experienced significant improvement in their clinical status without complications.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document