scholarly journals Disparities in Lung Protective Ventilation in the United States

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Malnoske ◽  
Caroline Quill ◽  
Amelia Barwise ◽  
Anthony Pietropaoli
Keyword(s):  
Tidal Volume ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
The United States ◽  
Protective Ventilation ◽  
Lung Protective Ventilation ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Abstract Background: Lung-protective ventilation is often used in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure, including those without acute respiratory distress syndrome. While disparities exist in the delivery of critical care based on gender, race, and insurance status, it is unknown whether there are disparities in the use of lung-protective ventilation. The objective of our study was to determine whether gender-, racial / ethnic-, or insurance status-based disparities exist in the use of lung-protective ventilation for critically ill mechanically ventilated patients in the United States (U.S.).Methods: This was a secondary data analysis of the U.S. Critical Illness and Injury Trials Group Critical Illness Outcomes Study, a prospective multi-center cohort study conducted from 2010 - 2012. The dependent variable of interest was the proportion of patients receiving tidal volume > 8 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW). The independent variables of interest were gender, insurance status, and race / ethnicity. Results: Our primary analysis included 1,595 mechanically ventilated patients from 59 intensive care units (ICUs) in the U.S. Women were more likely to receive tidal volumes > 8 ml/kg PBW than men (odds ratio [OR] = 3.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.58 – 4.09), though this relationship was substantially weakened after adjusting for gender differences in height (OR = 1.26 95% CI = 0.94 – 1.71). The underinsured were significantly more likely to receive tidal volume > 8 ml/kg PBW than the insured in multivariable analysis (odds ratio = 1.54, 95% confidence interval = 1.16 – 2.04). The prescription of > 8 ml/kg PBW tidal volume did not differ by racial or ethnic categories. Conclusions: In this prospective nationwide cohort of critically ill mechanically ventilated patients, women and the underinsured were less likely than their comparators to receive lung protective ventilation, with no apparent differences based on race / ethnicity alone. Differences in height between men and women do not fully explain this disparity. Future research should evaluate whether implicit bias affects tidal volume choice and other management decisions in critical care.

scholarly journals Multi-factorial Barriers and Facilitators to High Adherence to Lung Protective Ventilation Using a Computerized Protocol: A Mixed Methods Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J Knighton ◽  
Jacob Kean ◽  
Doug Wolfe ◽  
Lauren Allen ◽  
Jason Jacobs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tool Use ◽  
Protective Ventilation ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Lung Protective Ventilation ◽  
Adherence Level ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Implementation Effectiveness ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Abstract Background Lung-protective ventilation (LPV) improves outcomes for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) through administration of low tidal volumes (≤ 6.5 ml/kg predicted body weight [PBW]) with co-titration of positive end-expiratory pressure and fraction of inspired oxygen. Many patients with ARDS, however, are not managed with LPV. The purpose of this study was to understand implementation barriers and facilitators to the use of LPV and a computerized LPV clinical decision support (CDS) tool in intensive care units (ICUs) in preparation for a pilot hybrid implementation-effectiveness clinical trial. Methods We performed an explanatory sequential mixed methods study from June 2018 – March 2019 to evaluate variation in LPV adherence across 17 ICUs in an integrated healthcare system with > 4,000 mechanically-ventilated patients annually. We analyzed 47 key informant interviews of ICU physicians, respiratory therapists (RTs) and nurses in 3 of the ICUs using a qualitative content analysis paradigm to investigate site variation as defined by adherence level (low, medium, high) and identify barriers and facilitators to LPV and LPV CDS tool use. Results Forty-two percent of patients had an initial set tidal volume ≤ 6.5 ml/kg PBW during the measurement period (site range: 21–80%). LPV CDS tool use was 28% (site range: 6%-91%). This study’s main findings revealed multi-factorial facilitators and barriers to use that varied by ICU site adherence level. The primary facilitator was that LPV and the LPV CDS tool could be used on all mechanically-ventilated patients. Barriers included a persistent gap between clinician attitudes regarding the use of LPV and actual use; the perceived loss of autonomy associated with using a computerized protocol; the nature of physician-RT interaction in ventilation management; and the lack of clear organization measures of success. Conclusions Variation in adherence to LPV persists in ICUs within a healthcare delivery system that was an early adopter of LPV. Strategies to increase adherence to LPV for ARDS patients should include initiating low tidal ventilation on all mechanically ventilated patients, establishing and measuring adherence measures, and focused education addressing the physician-RT interaction. These strategies represent a blueprint for a future hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial.

scholarly journals Selection strategy for sedation depth in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Longxiang Su ◽  
Chun Liu ◽  
Fengxiang Chang ◽  
Bo Tang ◽  
Lin Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Dimensionality Reduction ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Latent Profile Analysis ◽  
Profile Analysis ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Sedation And Analgesia ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Abstract Background Analgesia and sedation therapy are commonly used for critically ill patients, especially mechanically ventilated patients. From the initial nonsedation programs to deep sedation and then to on-demand sedation, the understanding of sedation therapy continues to deepen. However, according to different patient’s condition, understanding the individual patient’s depth of sedation needs remains unclear. Methods The public open source critical illness database Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III was used in this study. Latent profile analysis was used as a clustering method to classify mechanically ventilated patients based on 36 variables. Principal component analysis dimensionality reduction was used to select the most influential variables. The ROC curve was used to evaluate the classification accuracy of the model. Results Based on 36 characteristic variables, we divided patients undergoing mechanical ventilation and sedation and analgesia into two categories with different mortality rates, then further reduced the dimensionality of the data and obtained the 9 variables that had the greatest impact on classification, most of which were ventilator parameters. According to the Richmond-ASS scores, the two phenotypes of patients had different degrees of sedation and analgesia, and the corresponding ventilator parameters were also significantly different. We divided the validation cohort into three different levels of sedation, revealing that patients with high ventilator conditions needed a deeper level of sedation, while patients with low ventilator conditions required reduction in the depth of sedation as soon as possible to promote recovery and avoid reinjury. Conclusion Through latent profile analysis and dimensionality reduction, we divided patients treated with mechanical ventilation and sedation and analgesia into two categories with different mortalities and obtained 9 variables that had the greatest impact on classification, which revealed that the depth of sedation was limited by the condition of the respiratory system.

SuPAR and PAI-1 in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 489-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ville Jalkanen ◽  
◽  
Runkuan Yang ◽  
Rita Linko ◽  
Heini Huhtala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Pai 1 ◽  
Ventilated Patients

scholarly journals The ethical concerns of seeking consent from critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients for research – A matter of possessing capacity or surrogate insight

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avelino C Verceles ◽  
Waqas Bhatti
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Ethical Concerns ◽  
Multiple Factors ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Conducting clinical research on subjects admitted to intensive care units is challenging, as they frequently lack the capacity to provide informed consent due to multiple factors including intensive care unit acquired delirium, coma, the need for sedation, or underlying critical illness. However, the presence of one or more of these characteristics does not automatically designate a potential subject as lacking capacity to provide their own informed consent. We review the ethical issues involved in obtaining informed consent for medical research from mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients, in addition to the concerns that may arise when a legally authorized representative is asked to provide informed consent on behalf of these patients.

The Feasibility of Objective Sleep-Quality Assessment in an ICU Setting

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 304-309
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Sleep Quality ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Sleep Stages ◽  
Poor Sleep ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Background: Sleep disruptions frequently occur in hospitalized patients, especially with critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. Severely altered sleep architectures result in unclassifiable sleep stages as listed by the conventional Rechtschaffen and Kales (R&K) criteria, and a new classification for sleep scoring including atypical sleep (AS) and pathological wakefulness (PW) has recently been proposed. Objective: To demonstrate the feasibility of performing objective sleep qualification in patients receiving mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory failure. Materials and Methods: In the present prospective cohort study, polysomnography was performed in 38 patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory failure at the respiratory care unit (RCU) of Siriraj Hospital between February and December 2017. Their sleep stages were analyzed by conventional rules and the new classifications of AS and PW. The associations between the presence of AS or PW and the patients’ characteristics were analyzed. Correlations between sleep quality and clinical parameters were also determined. Results: Most of the patients had poor sleep quality with median sleep efficiency (IQR) of 35.9% (18.5, 62.3) and significantly decreased slowwave sleep [median (IQR) 0.4% (0.00, 5.70)] and REM [median (IQR) 1.3% (0.00, 6.43)]. According to the new classifications, 14 out of 38 (prevalence of 36.8%) mechanically ventilated patients had AS. The prevalence of PW and either AS or PW were 36.8% and 52.6%, respectively. A higher baseline respiratory rate was observed among patients who had either AS or PW at 24 versus 20 breaths/minute (p=0.02), while a longer duration of mechanical ventilator support was found in patients with PW at nine versus five (p=0.003). Patient-ventilator asynchrony was also noted in all patients. Conclusion: Sleep quality among critically ill and mechanically ventilated patients was severely disturbed. A higher prevalence of AS and PW were noted. The technical feasibility of sleep recording in Thai intensive care unit (ICU) settings was established. Keywords: Polysomnography, Atypical sleep, ICU

scholarly journals Management of hypercapnia in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients—A narrative review of literature

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-333
Author(s):  
Ravindranath Tiruvoipati ◽  
Sachin Gupta ◽  
David Pilcher ◽  
Michael Bailey
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Tidal Volume ◽  
Dead Space ◽  
Hypercapnic Acidosis ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Low Tidal Volume ◽  
Volume Ventilation ◽  
Low Volume ◽  
Ventilated Patients

The use of lower tidal volume ventilation was shown to improve survival in mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury. In some patients this strategy may cause hypercapnic acidosis. A significant body of recent clinical data suggest that hypercapnic acidosis is associated with adverse clinical outcomes including increased hospital mortality. We aimed to review the available treatment options that may be used to manage acute hypercapnic acidosis that may be seen with low tidal volume ventilation. The databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched. Studies including animals or tissues were excluded. We also searched bibliographic references of relevant studies, irrespective of study design with the intention of finding relevant studies to be included in this review. The possible options to treat hypercapnia included optimising the use of low tidal volume mechanical ventilation to enhance carbon dioxide elimination. These include techniques to reduce dead space ventilation, and physiological dead space, use of buffers, airway pressure release ventilation and prone positon ventilation. In patients where hypercapnic acidosis could not be managed with lung protective mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal techniques may be used. Newer, minimally invasive low volume venovenous extracorporeal devices are currently being investigated for managing hypercapnia associated with low and ultra-low volume mechanical ventilation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document