scholarly journals Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or surgery: which is the optimal initial option for T3 breast cancer (> 5 cm)——a real world research from Chinese society of clinical oncology breast cancer database

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haibo Wang ◽  
Jianbin Li ◽  
Meng Lv ◽  
Yan Mao ◽  
Gang Nie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Real World ◽  
Maximum Diameter ◽  
Chinese Society ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Positive Lymph Nodes

Abstract Background: The objectives were to explore the real world treatment of T3 breast cancer (maximum diameter of tumor bigger than 5 centimeters). Materials and Methods: We selected T3 breast cases diagnosed from 2011 to 2017 in the CSCO BC database. These cases were categorized into two groups: non-NAC group and NAC group. Adjusted hazard ratios for known predictors of event free survival (EFS) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: The study included 868 patients: 49.0%(425/868) of patients chose NAC after diagnosis, 51.0%(443/868) chose surgery as their initial therapeutic strategy(non-NAC group). Compared with non-NAC group, patients in NAC group were correlated with clinical positive lymph nodes, hormonal receptor(HR) negative and human epidermal receptor growth factor 2(HER2) positive. For non-NAC group, only 87.1%(386/443) of patients were pathologic T3 after surgery, the overestimation of clinical examination of tumor lesion was 12.9%(57/443). In addition, there was no significance of EFS between the NAC group and non-NAC group(HR=0.82, 95%CI: 0.64-1.05). However, for T3 breast cancer patients with positive lymph nodes, HR negative and HER2 positive tumors, the NAC group had a better survival than the non-NAC group. Cox proportional analysis showed that lymph node negative, HER2 negative status and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were associated with a longer survival time. Conclusion: As the initial option for T3 breast cancer patients with positive lymph nodes, HR negative and HER2 positive tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the first therapy.

scholarly journals Real-world outcomes of postmastectomy radiotherapy in breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes: a retrospective study

2013 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Chitapanarux ◽  
E. Tharavichitkul ◽  
S. Jakrabhandu ◽  
P. Klunklin ◽  
W. Onchan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Real World ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Postmastectomy Radiotherapy ◽  
Positive Lymph Nodes

scholarly journals Clinical benefit of treatment after trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a real-world multi-centre cohort study in Japan (WJOG12519B)

Breast Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takamichi Yokoe ◽  
Sasagu Kurozumi ◽  
Kazuki Nozawa ◽  
Yukinori Ozaki ◽  
Tetsuyo Maeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Real World ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Trastuzumab Emtansine ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive

Abstract Background Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer after taxane with trastuzumab and pertuzumab is standard therapy. However, treatment strategies beyond T-DM1 are still in development with insufficient evidence of their effectiveness. Here, we aimed to evaluate real-world treatment choice and efficacy of treatments after T-DM1 for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Methods In this multi-centre retrospective cohort study involving 17 hospitals, 325 female HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients whose post-T-DM1 treatment began between April 15, 2014 and December 31, 2018 were enrolled. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR) of post-T-DM1 treatments. Secondary end points included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS). Results The median number of prior treatments of post-T-DM1 treatment was four. The types of post-T-DM1 treatments included (1) chemotherapy in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (n = 102; 31.4%), (2) chemotherapy concomitant with trastuzumab (n = 78; 24.0%), (3), lapatinib with capecitabine (n = 63; 19.4%), and (4) others (n = 82; 25.2%). ORR was 22.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 18.1–28.0], DCR = 66.6% (95% CI 60.8–72.0), median PFS = 6.1 months (95% CI 5.3–6.7), median TTF = 5.1 months (95% CI 4.4–5.6), and median OS = 23.7 months (95% CI 20.7–27.4). Conclusion The benefits of treatments after T-DM1 are limited. Further investigation of new treatment strategies beyond T-DM1 is awaited for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients.

Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in T1–2 Female Breast Cancer Patients with 1–3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes: A Propensity Score Matched SEER Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Xu ◽  
Shanshan Bu ◽  
Xiushen Wang ◽  
Hong Ge
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Female Breast Cancer ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Postmastectomy Radiotherapy ◽  
Female Breast ◽  
Positive Lymph Nodes

Abstract Purpose The application of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in T1–2 female breast cancer patients with 1–3 positive lymph nodes has been controversial. We sought to determine the survival benefits of PMRT in the patients with T1–2 and 1–3 positive nodes. Methods A retrospective study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Regs Custom Data (with additional treatment fields) from 2001 to 2011 was performed. Patients who received PMRT were matched by the propensity score with patients who did not receive PMRT. The Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed. Results We identified 56,725 female breast cancer patients with T1–2 and 1–3 positive nodes, and 18,646 patients were included in the analysis. After propensity score matching (1:1), with a median follow-up of 116 months, PMRT showed an increase in the OS (P = 0.018) but had no effect on the BCSS. The 10-year OS rates were 76.8% and 74.4%, and the 10-year BCSS rates were 82.8% and 82.2% for the patients who received and who did not receive PMRT, respectively. Only patients with 3 positive nodes could gain the benefit of PMRT for BCSS. Conclusion PMRT for patients with T1–2 and 1–3 positive lymph nodes could increase the 10-year OS, and had no effect on the 10-year BCSS. Subgroup analysis indicated that only patients with 3 positive lymph nodes could benefit from PMRT for both the OS and BCSS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document