scholarly journals Clinical Application of Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Via Superior Notch of Inferior Vertebral Pedicle Approach for Very High-grade Inferiorly Migrated Disc Herniation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Song Chen ◽  
Jinghuai Wang ◽  
Shiqi Suo ◽  
Yunxia Wang ◽  
Chengli Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Application ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Very High

Abstract Background: To assess the efficacy of the superior notch of inferior vertebral pedicle approach of transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for very high-grade inferiorly migrated disc herniation.Methods: Data on 32 consecutive patients operated with percutaneous endoscopic surgery via the superior notch of inferior vertebral pedicle approach were reviewed. Age, gender, clinical diagnoses, operation time, hospitalization time, a self-administered questionnaire composed of the leg pain visual analogue scale (VAS leg pain) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) had been recorded before operation and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after operation, respectively. The clinical results were assessed at the final follow-up by using modified Macnab criteria. Complications were recorded during follow-up, and postoperative X-ray, CT and MRI examinations were performed.Results: There were 21 males and 11 females. The mean age of patients was 51.8±10.6 years. MRI findings of patients with disc herniation were L2-3 level in 4 case, L3-4 level in 9 cases and L4-5 level in 19 cases, which were correlated with clinical symptoms. All patients completed a 12-month follow-up assessment after surgery. The mean operative duration was 68.2±12.8 min, and hospitalization time was 3.6±0.8 days. At 12 months follow up the VAS leg pain had improved by 6.3 (P< 0.05) and the ODI by 43.6 points (P< 0.05). Twenty-three cases (71.9%) were rated as excellent, 7 (21.9%) as good, 2 (6.2%) as fair at the final follow-up. On the basis of the modified MacNab criteria, the overall excellent and good rate was 93.8%. Two patients (6.2%) had transient dysesthesia after surgery. Postoperative radiological evaluations showed no signs of instability or recurrence of pathology.Conclusion: Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via the superior notch of inferior vertebral pedicle approach could be a safe and effective minimally invasive technique for very high-grade inferiorly migrated disc herniation. This technique warrants further study and clinical application.

scholarly journals Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5–S1 Disc Herniation: Transforaminal versus Interlaminar Approach

2013 ◽  
Vol 6;16 (6;11) ◽  
pp. 547-556
Author(s):  
Kyeong-Sik Ryu
Keyword(s):  
Return To Work ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Iliac Bone ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is a minimally invasive spinal technique. The unique anatomic features of the L5–S1 space include a large facet joint, narrow foramen, small disc space, and a wide interlaminar space. PELD can be performed via 2 routes, transforaminal (TF-PELD) or interlaminar (IL-PELD). However, it is questionable that the decision of the endoscopic route for L5–S1 discs only depends on the surgeon’s preference and anatomic relation between iliac bone and disc space. Thus far, no study has compared TF-PELD with IL-PELD for L5–S1 disc herniation. Objective: The goal of this study was to compare the radiologic features and results of TF-PELD and IL-PELD. We have clarified the patient selection for the PELD route for L5–S1 disc herniation. Study Design: Retrospective evaluation. Methods: Thirty consecutive patients each were treated with TF-PELD and IL-PELD for L5– S1 disc herniation in 2 institutes, respectively. Radiological assessments were performed pre- and postoperatively. The disc type, disc size, location, migration, disc height, foraminal height, iliolumbar angle, iliac height, and interlaminar space were analyzed. Clinical data were compared with a 2-year follow-up period. Pre- and postoperative pain was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 – 10) and functional status was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI; 0 – 100%) and the time to return to work. Results: In the 2 groups, the mean VAS scores for back and leg pain, as well as the ODI, were significantly improved. The mean time to return to work was 4.9 weeks with TF-PELD and 4.4 weeks with IL-PELD. Incomplete removal, resulting in the need for subsequent open surgery, occurred in one case (3.3%) of TF-PELD and in 2 cases (6.6%) of IL-PELD. Postoperative dysesthesia developed in 2 patients (6.7%) after IL-PELD; however, there was no dysesthesia after TF-PELD. Recurrence occurred in 3.3% with TF-PELD and in 6.7% with IL-PELD during the 2-year follow-up. A significant difference between groups was demonstrated in terms of disc type, location, and migration. The prevalence of axillary disc herniation (20 cases, 66.7%) was higher than that of shoulder disc herniation (10 cases, 33.3%) in the IL-PELD group. On the other hand, in the TF-PELD group, shoulder disc herniation (20 cases, 66.7%) was more prevalent than the axillary type (10 cases, 33.3%; P = 0.01). A higher number of patients in the TF-PELD group had central disc herniation (10 cases, 33.3%) compared with that in the IL-PELD group (2 cases, 6.7%; P = 0.01). Eleven cases (36.7%) of high grade migration were removed using IL-PELD and one case (6.7%) was removed using TF-PELD (P = 0.01). TF-PELD was used to remov only 3 cases of recurrent disc herniation. There were no significant differences of radiologic parameters between the iliac bone and L5–S1 disc space between the 2 groups. Limitations: This study has a relatively small sample size and a short follow-up period. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that TF-PELD is preferred for shoulder type, centrally located, and recurrent disc herniation, while IL-PELD is preferred for axillary type and migrated discs, especially those of a high grade. Key words: PELD, L5-S1 disc herniation, transforaminal, interlaminar

scholarly journals Surgical Outcome of Two-Level Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Far-Migrated Disc Herniation

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinbo Wu ◽  
Guoxin Fan ◽  
Xin Gu ◽  
Xiaofei Guan ◽  
Shisheng He
Keyword(s):  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Transforaminal Approach ◽  
Recurrent Herniation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Objective.To describe the two-level percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) technique in transforaminal approach for highly migrated disc herniation and investigate its clinical outcomes.Methods.A total of 22 consecutive patients with highly migrated lumbar disc herniation were enrolled for the study from June 2012 to February 2014.Results.There were 12 males and 10 females, with a mean age of 41.1 (range 23–67) years. The mean follow-up period was 18.05 (range 14–33) months. According to the modified MacNab criteria, the clinical outcome at the final follow-up was excellent in 14, good in 6, and fair in 2 patients and the satisfactory rate (excellent and good) was 90.9%. The improvements in VAS and ODI were statistically significant. One patient had recurrent herniation in 18 months after the first surgery and underwent open discectomy. One patient showed symptoms of postoperative dysesthesia (POD), but the POD symptom was transient and partial remission was achieved in two months after conservative treatment.Conclusion.Two-level PELD in transforaminal approach can be a safe and effective procedure for highly migrated disc herniation.

scholarly journals Suprapedicular Circumferential Opening Technique of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Discectomy for High Grade Inferiorly Migrated Lumbar Disc Herniation

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyeun Sung Kim ◽  
Farid Yudoyono ◽  
Byapak Paudel ◽  
Ki Joon Kim ◽  
Jee-Soo Jang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Outcome Evaluation ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
High Grade ◽  
The Mean

Purpose. To evaluate the efficacy of suprapedicular circumferential opening technique (SCOT) of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (PETLD) for high grade inferiorly migrated lumbar disc herniation. Material and Methods. Eighteen consecutive patients who presented with back and leg pain with a single-level high grade inferiorly migrated lumbar disc herniation were included. High grade inferiorly migrated disc was removed by the SCOT through PETLD approach. Outcome evaluation was done with visual analog scale (VAS) and Mac Nab’s criteria. Result. There were 14 males and 4 females. The mean age of patients was 53.3±14.12 years. One, 4, and 13 patients had disc herniation at L1-2, L3-4, and L4-5 levels, respectively, on MRI, which correlated with clinical findings. The mean follow-up duration was 8.4±4.31 months. According to Mac Nab’s criteria, 9 patients (50%) reported excellent and the remaining 9 patients (50%) reported good outcomes. The mean preoperative and postoperative VAS for leg pain were 7.36±0.73 and 1.45±0.60, respectively (p<0.001). Improvement in outcomes was maintained even at final follow-up. There was no complication. Conclusion. In this preliminary study we achieved good to excellent clinical results using the SCOT of PETLD for high grade inferiorly migrated lumbar disc herniation.

scholarly journals A Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation in the Korean: A Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manyoung Kim ◽  
Sol Lee ◽  
Hyeun-Sung Kim ◽  
Sangyoon Park ◽  
Sang-Yeup Shim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Lumbar Microdiscectomy ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Background. Among the surgical methods for lumbar disc herniation, open lumbar microdiscectomy is considered the gold standard. Recently, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy is also commonly performed for lumbar disc herniation for its various strong points. Objectives. The present study aims to examine whether percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy show better results as surgical treatments for lumbar disc herniation in the Korean population. Methods. In the present meta-analysis, papers on Korean patients who underwent open lumbar microdiscectomy and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy were searched, both of which are surgical methods to treat lumbar disc herniation. The papers from 1973, when percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy was first introduced, to March 2018 were searched at the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library. Results. Seven papers with 1254 patients were selected. A comparison study revealed that percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy had significantly better results than open lumbar microdiscectomy in the visual analogue pain scale at the final follow-up (leg: mean difference [MD]=-0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI]=-0.61, -0.09; p=0.009; back: MD=-0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]=-1.42, -0.17; p=0.01), Oswestry Disability Index (MD=-2.12; 95% CI=-4.25, 0.01; p=0.05), operation time (MD=-23.06; 95% CI=-32.42, -13.70; p<0.00001), and hospital stay (MD=-4.64; 95% CI=-6.37, -2.90; p<0.00001). There were no statistical differences in the MacNab classification (odds ratio [OR]=1.02; 95% CI=0.71, 1.49; p=0.90), complication rate (OR=0.72; 95% CI=0.20, 2.62; p=0.62), recurrence rate (OR=0.83; 95% CI=0.50, 1.38; p=0.47), and reoperation rate (OR=1.45; 95% CI=0.89, 2.35; p=0.13). Limitations. All 7 papers used for the meta-analysis were non-RCTs. Some differences (type of surgery (primary or revisional), treatment options before the operation, follow-up period, etc.) existed depending on the selected paper, and the sample size was small as well. Conclusion. While percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy showed better results than open lumbar microdiscectomy in some items, open lumbar microdiscectomy still showed good clinical results, and it is therefore reckoned that a randomized controlled trial with a large sample size would be required in the future to compare these two surgical methods.

scholarly journals Modified Percutaneous Lumbar Foraminoplasty and Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Instrument Design, Technique Notes, and 5 Years Follow-up

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (21;1) ◽  
pp. E85-E98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen-zhou Li
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Nerve Root ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Tendon Reflex ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Background: Conventional percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) with an “insideoutside” technique has 4.3% – 10.3% surgical failure rate, especially in central herniated discs (HDs), migrated HDs, and axillary type HDs. PELD with foraminoplasty has been used for complex HDs. Percutaneous lumbar foraminoplasty (PLF), which is performed with a trephine or bone reamer introduced over a guidewire without a protective working cannula in the original Tessys technique, can quickly cut the hypertrophied bony structure under fluoroscopic guidance, and risk injury to the exiting and traversing nerve roots. Study Design: A prospective cohort study. Setting: Hospital and outpatient surgical center. Objective: To evaluate the outcome and safety of modified PLF-PELD with a specially designed instrument for complex uncontained lumbar HDs. Method: From April of 2007 to April of 2009, 148 patients with uncontained lumbar HDs were treated with modified PLF-PELD. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) checkup was performed the next morning after the operation. Outcomes of symptoms were evaluated by follow-up interviews at 3 months, 6 months, one year, and 5 years after surgery. Low back pain and leg pain were measured by visual analog scale (VAS) score (1 – 100). Functional outcomes were assessed by using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and modified MacNab criteria. Result: Follow-up data were obtained from 134 cases, including 14 cases on L3-4, 78 cases on L4-5, and 42 cases on L5-S1. One hundred-eight cases were prolapse type, while 26 cases were sequestration type. Pre-operative symptoms and deficits included nerve root dermatome hypoesthesia in 98 patients (73%), nerve root myotome muscle weakness in 32 patients (23%), and weakening or disappearance of tendon reflex in 43 patients (32%). No case required conversion to an open procedure during the surgery. Low back pain and leg pain were significantly relieved immediately after surgery in all patients. MRI examination showed adequate removal of HD in all patients. VAS scores and ODI values were significantly lower at all time points after surgery than before surgery. The percentage of pain relief in leg pain was significantly higher than that in low back pain (P < 0.01). But there was no significant correlation between duration of the preoperative symptoms and the percentage of pain relief. MacNab scores at 5 years after surgery were obtained from 134 patients. Seventy-five cases were rated “excellent”; 49 were rated “good,” Five patients experienced heavier low back pain, thus being classified as “fair.” Five cases with recurrence were rated “poor.” Preoperative and postoperative (5 years follow-up) related nerve root function status was compared. Sensation and muscle strength recovered significantly (P < 0.01), while tendon reflex was not changed (P = 0.782). No patients had infections. Five patients were complicated with dysesthesia in distribution of the exiting nerve that was all operated at L5-S1. Complaints were reduced one week after treatment with medium frequency pulse electrotherapy. Five cases required a revision surgery after recurrence. Limitations: This is an observational clinical case series study without comparison. Cohort Study Modified Percutaneous Lumbar Foraminoplasty and Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Instrument Design, Technique Notes, and 5 Years Follow-up From: The First Affiliated Hospital of Chinese PLA’s General Hospital Beijing, China Address Correspondence: Zhen-zhou Li, M.D. Associate Chief Surgeon The First Affiliated Hospital of Chinese PLA’s General Hospital, Department of Orthopedic Surgery No. 51, Fucheng Road Haidian district Beijing, Beijing 100048 China 86 1068989322 E-mail: [email protected] Disclaimer: There was no external funding in the preparation of this manuscript. Conflict of interest: Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has no commercial association (i.e., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted manuscript. Manuscript received: 08-10-2015 Revised manuscript received: 12-28-2015 Accepted for publication: 03-28-2015 Free full manuscript: www.painphysicianjournal. com Zhen-zhou Li, MD, Shu-xun Hou, MD, Wei-lin Shang, MD, Ke-ran Song, MD, and Hong-liang Zhao, MD www.painphysicianjournal.com Pain Physician 2017; 20:E85-E98 • ISSN 2150-1149 Conclusion: Modified PLF-PELD with a specially designed instrument is a less invasive, effective and safe surgery for complex uncontained lumbar DH. Key words: Lumbar disc herniation, minimally invasive treatment, foraminoplasty, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy

scholarly journals Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5-S1 Disc Herniation: Consideration of the Relation between the Iliac Crest and L5-S1 Disc

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2;2) ◽  
pp. E301-E308
Author(s):  
Kyung-Chul Choi
Keyword(s):  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Iliac Crest ◽  
Facet Joint ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Herniated Disc ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Foraminal Height

Background: Percutaneous transforaminal techniques for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation have markedly evolved. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for L5-S1 disc herniation is regarded as challenging due to the unique anatomy of the iliac crest, large facet joint, and inclinatory disc space. Among these, the iliac crest is considered a major obstacle. There are no studies regarding the height of the iliac crest and their appropriate procedures in PELD. Objectives: This study discusses PELD for L5-S1 disc herniation and the appropriate approach according to the height of iliac crest. Study Design: Retrospective evaluation. Methods: 100 consecutive patients underwent PELD via the transforaminal route for L5-S1 disc herniation by a single surgeon. The study was divided into 2 groups: the foraminoplasty group requiring foraminal widening to access the herniated disc and the non-foraminoplasty group treated by conventional posterolateral access. Radiological parameters such as iliac height, the relative position of the iliac crest to the landmarks of the L5-S1 level, iliosacral angle and foraminal height, and disc location were considered. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0 – 10) for back and leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, 0 – 100%), and the modified MacNab criteria. Results: The overall VAS scores for back and leg pain decreased from 6.0 to 2.3 and from 7.5 to 1.7. The mean ODI (%) improved from 54.0 to 11.6. Using modified MacNab criteria, a good outcome was 92%. Foraminoplasty was required in 19 patients. Iliac crest height was significantly higher in the foraminoplasty group than the non-foraminoplasty group (37.7 mm vs 30.1 mm, P < 0.001). In the foraminoplasty group, the iliac crest is above the mid L5 pedicle on lateral radiography in all cases. There were no significant differences in foraminal height, foraminal width, iliosacral angle, or disc height between the 2 groups. In addition, there were no differences in clinical outcome between the 2 groups. Limitations: This study is a retrospective analysis and simplifies the complexity of the L5-S1 level and iliac bone using two-dimensional radiography. Conclusion: In high iliac crest cases where the iliac crest is above the mid L5 pedicle in lateral radiography, foraminoplasty may be considered for transforaminal access of L5-S1 disc herniation. Conventional transforaminal access can be utilized with ease in low iliac crest cases where the iliac crest is below the mid-L5 pedicle. Key words: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, transforaminal, L5-S1, iliac crest, foraminoplasty

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Treating Cauda Equina Syndrome Due To Lumbar Disc Herniation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai-Chao He ◽  
Xiao-qiang LV ◽  
Yong-Jin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Cauda Equina Syndrome ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Cauda Equina ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Abstract Background In recent decades, endoscopic techniques to treat lumbar disc herniation (LDH) have gained popularity in clinical practice. However, there is little literature on the use of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) to treat cauda equina syndrome (CES) due to LDH. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and clinical efficacy of PELD for treating CES caused by disc herniation, and as well as to report some technical strategies. Methods Between October 2012 and April 2018, 15 patients with CES caused by LDH at the early and intermediate stages of Shi’s classification were selected as the subjects of study, and underwent PELD. All patients were followed up for at least two years. The patients’ back pain and leg pain were evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Patient satisfaction was evaluated using the MacNab outcome scale. Clinical outcomes were measured preoperatively and at 3 days, 3 months, 6 months and the last follow-up. Results The VAS score for back pain, leg pain and ODI score significantly decreased from preoperatively scores of 6.67 ± 1.05, 7.13 ± 1.19 and 62.0 ± 6.85 respectively, to postoperatively cores of 1.80 ± 0.41, 1.47 ± 0.52 and 12.93 ± 1.03 at the last follow-up postoperatively. These postoperative scores were all significantly different compared with preoperative scores (P < 0.01). According to the modified MacNab outcome scale, 86.67% of these patients had excellent and good outcomes at the final follow-up. Complications included one patient with cerebrospinal fluid leakage and one patient who developed recurrent herniation; the latter patient finally achieved satisfactory results after reoperation. Conclusion PELD could be used as an alternative surgical method for the treatment of CES due to LDH in properly selected cases and appropriate patient selection. However, the operator should pay attention to foraminoplasty to enlarge the working space.

scholarly journals Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus microdiscectomy: an Indian rural experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 1141
Author(s):  
Prakash U. Chavan ◽  
Mahendra Gudhe ◽  
Ashok Munde ◽  
Balaji Jadhav
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Single Level ◽  
Group I ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The objective of the study was to compare surgical outcome of micro-discectomy with transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for single level lumbar disc herniation in Indian rural population.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Retrospective comparative study was designed during the period of October 2012 to June 2015, patients in the age group of 22-75 years with unremitting sciatica with/without back pain, and/or a neurological deficit that correlated with appropriate level and side of neural compression as revealed on MRI, with single level lumbar disc herniation who underwent either microdiscectomy or TPELD were included in the study. Patients were assessed on visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, modified macnabs criteria, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Group I (MD) included 44 patients and Group II (TPELD) included 20 patients. Significant improvement was seen in claudication symptom post-operatively in both MD and TPELD. Mean operating time was significantly shorter in MD group (1.11 hrs vs. 1.32 hrs; p&lt;0.01). According to modified MacNab's criteria,<strong> </strong>outcome were excellent (81.8%), good (9.09%) and fair<strong> </strong>(9.09%) in MD. Similarly, in TPELD, 80%, 15% and 5% patients had excellent, good and fair outcome respectively. In both groups, no one had a poor outcome. Thus, overall success rate was 100% in the study.</p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> TPELD and MD have comparable post-operative outcome in most of the efficacy parameters in Indian rural patients undergoing treatment of single level lumbar disc herniation. Additionally, TPELD offers distinct advantages such as performed under local anaesthesia, preservation of structure, lesser post-operative pain and early mobilization and discharge from hospital.

scholarly journals Recurrent disc herniation following percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy preferentially occurs when Modic changes are present

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Hao ◽  
Shengwen Li ◽  
Junhui Liu ◽  
Zhi Shan ◽  
Shunwu Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nucleus Pulposus ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Hyaline Cartilage ◽  
Modic Changes ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Herniated Disc ◽  
Type I ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Abstract Objective: To investigate the relationship between Modic changes (MCs) and recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH), and that between the herniated disc component and rLDH following percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Methods: We included 102 (65 males, 37 females, aged 20–66 yrs) inpatients who underwent PELD from August 2013 to August 2016. All patients underwent CT and MRI preoperatively. The presence and type of Modic changes were assessed. During surgery the herniated disc component of each patient was classified into two groups: nucleus pulposus group, hyaline cartilage group. The association of herniated disc component with Modic changes was investigated. The incidence of recurrent disc herniation was assessed based on more than 2-year follow-up. Results: In total, 11 patients were lost to follow up; the other 91 were followed up during 24–60 months. Of the 91 patients, 99 discs underwent PELD; 28/99 (28.3%) had MCs. Type I and II MCs were seen in 9 (9.1%) and 19 (19.2%), respectively; no type III MCs were found. Among 28 endplates with MCs, according to the herniated disc component, 18/28 (64.3%) showed evidence of hyaline cartilage in the intraoperative specimens, including 6/9 and 12/19 endplates with type I and II MCs, respectively. Among 71 endplates without MCs, 14/71 (19.7%) showed evidence of hyaline cartilage in the intraoperative specimens. Hyaline cartilage was more common in patients with MCs (P<0.05). We found 2 cases of rLDH in the non-MC group (n=71); 6 cases rLDH were found in the MC group (n=28), including 2 and 4 cases for types I and II, respectively. There was no significant difference between types I and II (P>0.05). rLDH was more common in patients with MCs (P<0.05). We found 5 rLDH cases in the hyaline cartilage group (n=32); 3 rLDH cases were found in the nucleus pulposus group (n=67). rLDH was more common in the hyaline cartilage group (P<0.05). Conclusions: MCs were associated with the herniated cartilage disc component. rLDH following PELD preferentially occurs when MCs or the herniated cartilage are present. Patients with MCs following PELD might require a second operation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document