scholarly journals Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm could be candidates for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a retrospective study.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsunori Tanimoto ◽  
Kazuhiro Sugiyama ◽  
Maki Tanabe ◽  
Kanta Kitagawa ◽  
Ayumi Kawakami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Emergency Medical Service Personnel ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a promising treatment for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Most studies evaluating the effectiveness of ECPR include patients with an initial shockable rhythm. However, the effectiveness of ECPR for patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm remains unknown. This retrospective single-center study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ECPR for patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm, with reference to the outcomes of OHCA patients with an initial shockable rhythm. Methods Adult OHCA patients treated with ECPR at our center during 2011–2018 were included in the study. Patients were classified into the initial shockable rhythm group and the non-shockable rhythm group. The primary outcome was the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale score at hospital discharge. A CPC score of 1 or 2 was defined as a good outcome. Results In total, 186 patients were eligible. Among them, 124 had an initial shockable rhythm and 62 had an initial non-shockable rhythm. Among all patients, 158 (85%) were male, with a median age of 59 (interquartile range [IQR], 48–65) years, and the median low flow time was 41 (IQR, 33–48) min. Collapse was witnessed in 169 (91%) patients, and 36 (19%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) transiently. Proportion of female patients, presence of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and collapse after the arrival of emergency medical service personnel were significantly higher in the non-shockable rhythm group. The rate of good outcomes at hospital discharge was not significantly different between the shockable and non-shockable groups (19% vs. 16%, p=0.69). Initial shockable rhythm was not significantly associated with good outcome after controlling for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio 1.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.66–3.81, p=0.31). In the non-shockable group, patients with good outcomes had a higher rate of transient ROSC, and pulmonary embolism was the leading etiology. Conclusions The outcomes of patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm are comparable with those having an initial shockable rhythm. OHCA patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm could be candidates for ECPR, if they are presumed to have reversible etiology and potential for good neurological recovery.

scholarly journals Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm could be candidates for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsunori Tanimoto ◽  
Kazuhiro Sugiyama ◽  
Maki Tanabe ◽  
Kanta Kitagawa ◽  
Ayumi Kawakami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Emergency Medical Service Personnel ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a promising treatment for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Most studies evaluating the effectiveness of ECPR include patients with an initial shockable rhythm. However, the effectiveness of ECPR for patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm remains unknown. This retrospective single-center study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ECPR for patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm, with reference to the outcomes of OHCA patients with an initial shockable rhythm. Methods Adult OHCA patients treated with ECPR at our center during 2011–2018 were included in the study. Patients were classified into the initial shockable rhythm group and the non-shockable rhythm group. The primary outcome was the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale score at hospital discharge. A CPC score of 1 or 2 was defined as a good outcome. Results In total, 186 patients were eligible. Among them, 124 had an initial shockable rhythm and 62 had an initial non-shockable rhythm. Among all patients, 158 (85%) were male, with a median age of 59 (interquartile range [IQR], 48–65) years, and the median low flow time was 41 (IQR, 33–48) min. Collapse was witnessed in 169 (91%) patients, and 36 (19%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) transiently. Proportion of female patients, presence of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and collapse after the arrival of emergency medical service personnel were significantly higher in the non-shockable rhythm group. The rate of good outcomes at hospital discharge was not significantly different between the shockable and non-shockable groups (19% vs. 16%, p = 0.69). Initial shockable rhythm was not significantly associated with good outcome after controlling for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio 1.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.66–3.81, p = 0.31). In the non-shockable group, patients with good outcomes had a higher rate of transient ROSC, and pulmonary embolism was the leading etiology. Conclusions The outcomes of patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm are comparable with those having an initial shockable rhythm. OHCA patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm could be candidates for ECPR, if they are presumed to have reversible etiology and potential for good neurological recovery.

scholarly journals Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm could be candidates for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a retrospective study.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsunori Tanimoto ◽  
Kazuhiro Sugiyama ◽  
Maki Tanabe ◽  
Kanta Kitagawa ◽  
Ayumi Kawakami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Emergency Medical Service Personnel ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a promising treatment for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Most studies evaluating the effectiveness of ECPR include patients with an initial shockable rhythm. However, the effectiveness of ECPR for patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm remains unknown. This retrospective single-center study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ECPR for patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm, with reference to the outcomes of OHCA patients with an initial shockable rhythm. Methods Adult OHCA patients treated with ECPR at our center during 2011–2018 were included in the study. Patients were classified into the initial shockable rhythm group and the non-shockable rhythm group. The primary outcome was the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale score at hospital discharge. A CPC score of 1 or 2 was defined as a good outcome.Results In total, 186 patients were eligible. Among them, 124 had an initial shockable rhythm and 62 had an initial non-shockable rhythm. Among all patients, 158 (85%) were male, with a median age of 59 (interquartile range [IQR], 48–65) years, and the median low flow time was 41 (IQR, 33–48) min. Collapse was witnessed in 169 (91%) patients, and 36 (19%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) transiently. Proportion of female patients, presence of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and collapse after the arrival of emergency medical service personnel were significantly higher in the non-shockable rhythm group. The rate of good outcomes at hospital discharge was not significantly different between the shockable and non-shockable groups (19% vs. 16%, p=0.69). Initial shockable rhythm was not significantly associated with good outcome after controlling for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio 1.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.66–3.81, p=0.31). In the non-shockable group, patients with good outcomes had a higher rate of transient ROSC, and pulmonary embolism was the leading etiology.Conclusions The outcomes of patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm are comparable with those having an initial shockable rhythm. OHCA patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm could be candidates for ECPR, if they are presumed to have reversible etiology and potential for good neurological recovery.

scholarly journals Promising candidates for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yo Sep Shin ◽  
Youn-Jung Kim ◽  
Seung Mok Ryoo ◽  
Chang Hwan Sohn ◽  
Shin Ahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Neurologic Outcome ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Neurologic Status ◽  
Good Neurologic Outcome ◽  
Hospital Stays ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

AbstractPrecise criteria for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) are still lacking in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We aimed to investigate whether adopting our hypothesized criteria for ECPR to patients with refractory OHCA could benefit. This before-after study compared 4.5 years after implementation of ECPR for refractory OHCA patients who met our criteria (Jan, 2015 to May, 2019) and 4 years of undergoing conventional CPR (CCPR) prior to ECPR with patients who met the criteria (Jan, 2011 to Jan, 2014) in the emergency department. The primary and secondary outcomes were good neurologic outcome at 6-months and 1-month respectively, defined as 1 or 2 on the Cerebral Performance Category score. A total of 70 patients (40 with CCPR and 30 with ECPR) were included. For a good neurologic status at 6-months and 1-month, patients with ECPR (33.3%, 26.7%) were superior to those with CCPR (5.0%, 5.0%) (all Ps < 0.05). Among patients with ECPR, a group with a good neurologic status showed shorter low-flow time, longer extracorporeal membrane oxygenation duration and hospital stays, and lower epinephrine doses used (all Ps < 0.05). The application of the detailed indication before initiating ECPR appears to increase a good neurologic outcome rate.

scholarly journals Shockable Rhythm at Hospital Arrival as the Predictor of Favourable Neurological Outcome in Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) Receiving Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei-I Su ◽  
Min-Shan Tsai ◽  
Wei-Ting Chen ◽  
Chih-Hung Wang ◽  
Wei-Tien Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Arrival ◽  
Neurological Outcomes ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Introduction: For patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) without return of spontaneous circulation under advanced life support, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is the only lifesaving option. This study aimed to analyse the predictors of favourable neurological outcomes (FO, cerebral performance category 1-2) at hospital discharge among patients with OHCA following ECPR.Methods: In this single-centre retrospective study, 126 patients with OHCA who received ECPR between January 2012 and December 2019 were enrolled. The primary outcome was the FO at hospital discharge. The predictors of FO were assessed using multiple logistic regression analysis. Patients with an initial shockable rhythm were further analysed according to the cardiac rhythm at the time of hospital arrival. Results: Among the patients who received ECPR, the FO at hospital discharge was 21%. Certain resuscitation variables were associated with FO including witnessed collapse (P=0.014), bystander CPR (P=0.05), shorter no-flow time (P=0.008), and a shockable rhythm at hospital arrival (P=0.009). Multiple logistic regression showed that a shockable rhythm at hospital arrival was the only independent predictor of FO at discharge (odds ratio, 3.012; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-8.53; P=0.038). Among patients with an initial shockable rhythm, the group with a shockable rhythm at hospital arrival had a FO of 30%, which was significantly higher than the 11% in the non-shockable rhythm group (P=0.043).Conclusions: In patients with OHCA who received ECPR, a shockable rhythm at the time of hospital arrival was associated with favourable neurological outcomes at discharge. The ECPR selection criteria could consider the rhythm at hospital arrival.

scholarly journals How many prehospital defibrillation attempts should be performed in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with shockable rhythm?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byuk Sung Ko ◽  
Youn-Jung Kim ◽  
Kap Su Han ◽  
You Hwan Jo ◽  
Jonghwan Shin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Neurologic Outcome ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Good Neurologic Outcome ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background: Early defibrillation is vital to improve outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with shockable rhythm. Currently, there is no agreed consensus on the number of defibrillation attempts before transfer to a hospital. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between the number of defibrillations on the prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).Methods: A multicenter, prospective, observational registry-based study was conducted for OHCA in patients with presumed cardiac etiology that underwent prehospital defibrillation between October 2015 and June 2017. The primary outcome was prehospital ROSC, and the secondary outcome was a good neurologic outcome at hospital discharge, defined as Cerebral Performance Category score 1 or 2. Results: Among 2,155 OHCA patients’ data, 178 patients with missing data were excluded, a total of 1,983 OHCA patients who received prehospital defibrillation were included. The median age was 61 years and prehospital ROSC was observed in 738 patients (37.2%). The median time from arrest to first defibrillation was 10 (interquartile range: 7-15) minutes. The cumulative ROSC rates and good neurologic outcome from the initial defibrillation to the sixth defibrillation were 43%, 68%, 81%, 90%, 95%, 98% and 42%, 66%, 81%, 90%, 95%, 98%, respectively. After clinical characteristics adjustment and time to defibrillation, the number of defibrillations were independently associated with ROSC (odds ratio 0.81 95% CI 0.76-0.86) and good neurologic outcome (odds ratio 0.86 95% CI 0.80-0.91). Moreover, subgroup analysis results with patients that underwent the initial defibrillation within 10 minutes from arrest were consistent (95% up to five times).Conclusion: More than 95% of prehospital ROSC was achieved within five times of defibrillation in OHCA patients. This result provides a basis for the ideal number of defibrillation attempts before transfer to hospital with the possibility of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in these refractory ventricular fibrillation patients.

Abstract 364: Association Between Cardiac Arrest to Start of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Outcome in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Due to Acute Coronary Syndrome

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoji Kawakami ◽  
Yoshio Tahara ◽  
Teruo Noguchi ◽  
Shujiro Inoue ◽  
Satoshi Yasuda
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Cutoff Point ◽  
Receiver Operating Curve ◽  
Target Temperature Management ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: The proper timing of introducing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has yet to be well-established. Hypothesis: The interval of start of ECPR from cardiac arrest is one of predictors of short-term survival in these particularly ill patients. Methods: Between June 2014 and December 2015, we enrolled a total of 13,491 Japanese OHCA patients who were transported to hospitals in a multicenter, prospective fashion (JAAM-OHCA registry). Following exclusion criteria, 72 patients with OHCA due to ACS who were introduced ECPR until return of spontaneous circulation and underwent emergent PCI and target temperature management were eligible for this study (median 59 years-old; 95% male). We investigated the relationship between the interval of start of ECPR or successfully coronary revascularization from cardiac arrest (collapse-to-ECPR or collapse-to-PCI interval) and the survival at 30 days. Results: Patients with survival at 30 days were 50% (n=36). Age, gender, the prevalence of patients with bystander CPR or ST-elevation and collapse-to-PCI interval were comparable between patients with/without survival. The survival patients had the higher prevalence of initial shockable rhythm and the shorter collapse-to-ECPR interval than those without survival (84 vs 57%, p=0.018; 50 vs 57 min, p=0.045). Receiver operating curve analysis indicated collapse-to-ECPR interval cutoff point of 50 min (area under the curve 0.66, sensitivity 54%, specificity 75%) and collapse-to-PCI interval cutoff point of 135 min (0.65, 64%, and 67%, respectively) for predicting survival at 30 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed initial shockable rhythm and collapse-to-ECPR interval as the independent predictors of survival (OR 5.71, p=0.015; OR 1.05, p=0.025, respectively). Conclusion: Collapse-to-ECPR interval is a significantly associated with 30 days survival in patients with OHCA due to ACS, while collapse-to-PCI interval is not independent predictor of survival in this study. These findings indicate that time management for start of ECPR from cardiac arrest can be essential for improving OHCA patients’ survival.

Abstract 9450: Shockable Rhythm at Hospital Arrival as the Predictor of Favorable Neurological Outcome in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei-I Su
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression ◽  
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Arrival ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Favorable Neurological Outcome

Introduction: For OHCA patients without ROSC under standard ALS, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) was the only chance. However, ECPR was invasive and costed tremendous resources. This study aimed to analyze the predictor of favorable neurological outcome at hospital discharge (FO, cerebral performance category 1-2). Hypothesis: In OHCA patients receiving ECPR, shockable rhythm at hospital arrival could serve as predictor of FO. Method: This was a single center retrospective study which enrolled 126 OHCA patients receiving ECPR between January 2012 to December 2019. Primary outcome was FO at hospital discharge. Predictors of FO were assessed by multiple logistic regression. Patients with initial shockable rhythm were analyzed according to the cardiac rhythm at hospital arrival. Result: Among OHCA patients receiving ECPR, FO at hospital discharge was 21%. Certain variables were associated with FO: witnessed collapse (P=0.014), bystander CPR (P=0.05), shorter no flow time(P=0.008), and shockable rhythm at hospital arrival (78% vs. 49%;P=0.009). Initial shockable rhythm did not differ significantly (85% vs. 71% ;P=0.15). Multiple logistic regression showed that shockable rhythm at hospital arrival was the only predictor of FO (OR, 3.012; 95% CI, 1.06-8.53; P=0.038). Patients with initial shockable rhythm represented a heterogenous group. The group with shockable rhythm at hospital arrival had 30% of FO, which was significantly higher than 17% in PEA group, and 6% in asystole group (Graph 1). Patients who remained shockable had higher percentage of witnessed arrest, shorter arrest-hospital time, less metabolic disturbance, and hence higher percentage of FO. Conclusion: In OHCA patients receiving ECPR, shockable rhythm at hospital arrival could predict favorable neurological outcome at discharge more precisely than initial shockable rhythm. ECPR selection criteria should take the rhythm at hospital arrival into consideration.

Abstract 16428: Characteristics and Impact of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Following Pediatric Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States: A Study From the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES)

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Y Naim ◽  
Rita V Burke ◽  
Bryan F McNally ◽  
Robert A Berg ◽  
Kimberly Vellano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hispanic Children ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Few Data ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) is associated with improved outcome in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). There are few data on the prevalence and impact of BCPR on children. Hypothesis: We aimed to characterize BCPR in pediatric OHCA and test the hypothesis that BCPR would occur infrequently and would be associated with neurologically favorable survival at hospital discharge from a large cardiac arrest registry in the United States. Methods: We conducted an analysis of the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival database. Inclusion criteria were age ≤ 18 years of age and non-traumatic OHCA from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014. Neurologically favorable survival was defined as a Cerebral Performance Category Scale of 1 or 2. Results: A total of 2,176 cardiac arrests were evaluated. Most patients were infants (62%) or adolescents (19%). Most arrests occurred at home (86%), were unwitnessed (75%), and had a non-shockable rhythm (93%). BCPR was provided in 49%, most commonly by a family member (71%). BCPR was more common for white (60%) compared to black (42%) and Hispanic children (44%) (p<0.001). Overall, BCPR was associated with a higher rate of neurologically favorable survival (11% vs. 7%, odds ratio [OR]1.6 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-2.3). In sub-group analyses, BCPR was associated with a higher rate of neurologically favorable survival for out of home arrests (34% vs. 15%, OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.6-5.3), and arrests presenting in a shockable rhythm (48% vs. 32%, OR 2.0 95% CI 1.0-4.0). For infants BCPR was not associated with survival (6.4% vs. 6.0%, OR 1.1 95% CI 0.7-1.7) or neurologically favorable survival (5.2% vs. 5.0%, OR 1.1 95% CI 0.6-1.8). Conclusion: BCPR was provided in just under 50% of pediatric OHCAs and was more common for white compared to black and Hispanic children. BCPR was associated with improved survival that was most notable in out of home arrests, with over twice as many patients having neurologically favorable survival. Though infants comprised the largest age group, no effect of BCPR outcome was observed. This impact of BCPR suggests the need for a public health strategy to improve the provision of BCPR, and the need for an alternative strategy for some groups including infants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document