scholarly journals Evaluation of caregiver burden, and quality of life in metastatic prostate cancer patients and caregivers; Effects of clinical and socioeconomic factors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozgen Ahmet Yildirim ◽  
Kerem Poyraz ◽  
Erkan Erdur ◽  
Canan Can ◽  
Cihan Gundogan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Caregiver Burden ◽  
Public Transportation ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Palliative Radiotherapy ◽  
Visceral Metastasis ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Sf 36

Abstract Purpose: To investigate the caregiver burden and quality of life (QoL) of patients with metastatic prostate cancer. The relationship between questionnaire results and medical, socioeconomic, disease and treatment related factors of the patients were evaluated. Methods: One hundred twenty one metastatic prostate cancer patients and caregivers were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires and Zarit caregiver burden interviews (ZCBI) were conducted with patients and their caregivers seperately. Patients’ comorbidities, presence of bone and visceral metastases, bone related events, palliative radiotherapy needs, ECOG scores, being under active chemotherapy, socioeconomic factors such as public transportation need, residential factors and caregiver related factors such as comorbidities and kinships were recorded respectively. Results: Patients’ comorbidities, ECOG score, presence and quantity of bone or visceral metastasis, bone related events, receiving palliative radiotherapy and chemotherapy, using public transportation resulted in lower SF-36 and higher ZCBI results (p < 0.001– p = 0.049). Obligation to live in rented houses were correlated with lower SF-36 physical function results (p = 0.043). Condition of the caregiver being from distant relatives resulted in a lower SF-36 score (p = 0.01 - p= 0.043). Moderate to strong negative correlation was detected between ZCBI and all SF-36 results (p < 0.001, r: -646 to -749). In ZCBI, score over 47 resulted with % 69.57 sensitivity and % 65.52 specificity (AUC = 0.671, p = 0.008). Conclusion: QoL was directly related to caregiver burden. Factors such as patient comorbidities, bone metastasis and related situations, ECOG score, presence of visceral metastasis, actively undergoing chemotherapy, low socioeconomic status and poor family support negatively affect both the quality of life of patients and caregiver burden. If a social assistance system can be implemented in which these factors can be monitored systematically, objective and cost-effective benefits related to the care of these patients and the maintenance of their quality of life can be achieved.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment intervention on quality of life, caregiver burden and length of hospital stay: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongyi Chen ◽  
Zhaosheng Ding ◽  
Caixia Chen ◽  
Yangfan Sun ◽  
Yuyu Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Caregiver Burden ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Background Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) interventions can improve functional ability and reduce mortality in older adults, but the effectiveness of CGA intervention on the quality of life, caregiver burden, and length of hospital stay remains unclear. The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of CGA intervention on the quality of life, length of hospital stay, and caregiver burden in older adults by conducting meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Methods A literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for papers published before February 29, 2020, based on inclusion criteria. Standardised mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated using the random-effects model. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias analyses were also conducted. Results A total of 28 RCTs were included. Overall, the intervention components common in different CGA intervention models were interdisciplinary assessments and team meetings. Meta-analyses showed that CGA interventions improved the quality of life of older people (SMD = 0.12; 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.21; P = 0.009) compared to usual care, and subgroup analyses showed that CGA interventions improved the quality of life only in participants’ age > 80 years and at follow-up ≤3 months. The change value of quality of life in the CGA intervention group was better than that in the usual care group on six dimensions of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36). Also, compared to usual care, the CGA intervention reduced the caregiver burden (SMD = − 0.56; 95% CI = − 0.97 to − 0.15, P = 0.007), but had no significant effect on the length of hospital stay. Conclusions CGA intervention was effective in improving the quality of life and reducing caregiver burden, but did not affect the length of hospital stay. It is recommended that future studies apply the SF-36 to evaluate the impact of CGA interventions on the quality of life and provide supportive strategies for caregivers as an essential part of the CGA intervention, to find additional benefits of CGA interventions.

Impact of locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer on the quality of life

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 368-375
Author(s):  
I. López-Calderero ◽  
L. López-Fando ◽  
E. Ríos-González ◽  
P. Maisonobe ◽  
E. Hernández-Yuste ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced

scholarly journals The type 2 diabetes-specific dementia risk score (DSDRS) is associated with frailty, cognitive and functional status amongst Mexican community-dwelling older adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Yaxmehen Bello-Chavolla ◽  
Carlos Alberto Aguilar-Salinas ◽  
José Alberto Avila-Funes
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Dementia Risk ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Community Dwelling Older Adults

Abstract Background The type 2 diabetes (T2D) specific dementia-risk score (DSDRS) was developed to evaluate dementia risk in older adults with T2D. T2D-related factors have been shown increase the risk of age-related conditions, which might also increase dementia risk. Here, we investigate the associations of DSDRS with frailty, disability, quality of life (QoL) and cognition in community-dwelling older adults with T2D. Methods We included 257 community-dwelling older adults with T2D to evaluate the association between DSDRS and Mini-mental state examination (MMSE), Isaac’s set-test (IST), clock drawing test (CDT), quality of life (SF-36), risk of malnutrition (Mini-Nutritional Assessment or MNA), as well as frailty, Katz’ and Lawton-Brody scores. We also assessed the phenotype and correlates of high-estimated dementia risk by assessing individuals with DSDRS >75th age-specific percentiles. Results Mean age of participants was 78.0 ± 6.2 years. DSDRS showed a significant correlation with MMSE test, IST, CDT, SF-36, MNA, Lawton-Brody and Katz scores, and an increasing number of frailty components. DSDRS was higher among frail, pre-frail, and subjects with limited ADL and IADL (p < 0.001). Participants with DSDRS >75th age-specific percentiles had lower education, MMSE, IST, SF-36, MNA, Katz, Lawton-Brody, and higher frailty scores. High-estimated 10-year dementia risk was associated with ADL and IADL disability, frailty and risk of malnutrition. When assessing individual components of DSDRS, T2D-related microvascular complications were associated to all outcome measures. Conclusion The DSDRS is associated with frailty, disability, malnutrition and lower cognitive performance. These findings support that T2D-related factors have significant burden on functional status, QoL, disability and dementia risk.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document