scholarly journals Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients On Persistent Moderate Disease Activity On Biologics Have Adverse 5-years Outcome Compared To Persistent Low-remission Status Yet They Represent A Heterogeneous Group: Lower-moderate Has Better Functionality And Fewer Serious Adverse Events Than Higher-moderate Subgroup

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irini Genitsaridi ◽  
Irini Flouri ◽  
Dimitris Plexousakis ◽  
Konstantinos Marias ◽  
Kyriaki Boki ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The long-term outcome of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who in clinical practice, exhibit persistent moderate disease activity (pMDA) despite treatment with biologics has not been adequately studied. Herein, we analyzed the 5-year outcome of the pMDA group and assessed for within-group heterogeneity. Methods We included longitudinally-monitored RA patients from the Hellenic Registry of Biologic Therapies with persistent (cumulative time ≥50% of a 5-year period) moderate (pMDA, 3.2<DAS28≤5.1) or remission/low (pRLDA, DAS28≤3.2) disease activity. The former was further classified into persistent lower-moderate (plMDA, DAS28<4.2) and higher-moderate (phMDA, DAS28≥4.2) subgroups. Five-year trajectories of functionality (HAQ) was the primary outcome in comparing pRLDA versus pMDA and assessing heterogeneity within the pMDA subgroups through multivariable mixed-effect regression. Results We identified 295 patients with pMDA and 90 patients with pRLDA, the former group comprising of plMDA (n=133, 45%) and phMDA (n=162, 55%). pMDA was associated with worse 5-year functionality trajectory than pRLDA (+0.27 HAQ units, CI 95% +0.22 to +0.33; p<0.0001), while the phMDA subgroup had worse 5-year functionality than plMDA (+0.26 HAQ units, CI 95% 0.18 to 0.36; p<0.0001). Importantly, higher persistent disease activity was associated with more serious adverse events (SAEs) [pRLDA: 0.2±0.48 vs pMDA: 0.5±0.96, p=0.006; plMDA: 0.32 ±0.6 vs phMDA: 0.64 ±1.16, p=0.038). Male gender (p=0.017), lower baseline DAS28 (p<0.001), HAQ improvement >0.22 (p=0.029) and lower average DAS28 during the first trimester since treatment initiation (p=0.001), independently predicted grouping into pRLDA. Conclusions In clinical practice, RA patients with pMDA while on bDMARDs have adverse long-term outcome compared to lower disease activity status, while heterogeneity exists within the pMDA group in terms of 5-year functionality and SAEs. Targeted studies to better characterize pMDA subgroups are needed, in order to assist clinicians in tailoring treatments.

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Irini Genitsaridi ◽  
Irini Flouri ◽  
Dimitris Plexousakis ◽  
Konstantinos Marias ◽  
Kyriaki Boki ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The long-term outcome of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who in clinical practice exhibit persistent moderate disease activity (pMDA) despite treatment with biologics has not been adequately studied. Herein, we analyzed the 5-year outcome of the pMDA group and assessed for within-group heterogeneity. Methods We included longitudinally monitored RA patients from the Hellenic Registry of Biologic Therapies with persistent (cumulative time ≥ 50% of a 5-year period) moderate (pMDA, 3.2 < DAS28 ≤ 5.1) or remission/low (pRLDA, DAS28 ≤ 3.2) disease activity. The former was further classified into persistent lower-moderate (plMDA, DAS28 < 4.2) and higher-moderate (phMDA, DAS28 ≥ 4.2) subgroups. Five-year trajectories of functionality (HAQ) were the primary outcome in comparing pRLDA versus pMDA and assessing heterogeneity within the pMDA subgroups through multivariable mixed-effect regression. We further compared serious adverse events (SAEs) occurrence between the two groups. Results We identified 295 patients with pMDA and 90 patients with pRLDA, the former group comprising of plMDA (n = 133, 45%) and phMDA (n = 162, 55%). pMDA was associated with worse 5-year functionality trajectory than pRLDA (+ 0.27 HAQ units, CI 95% + 0.22 to + 0.33; p < 0.0001), while the phMDA subgroup had worse 5-year functionality than plMDA (+ 0.26 HAQ units, CI 95% 0.18 to 0.36; p < 0.0001). Importantly, higher persistent disease activity was associated with more SAEs [pRLDA: 0.2 ± 0.48 vs pMDA: 0.5 ± 0.96, p = 0.006; plMDA: 0.32 ± 0.6 vs phMDA: 0.64 ± 1.16, p = 0.038]. Male gender (p = 0.017), lower baseline DAS28 (p < 0.001), HAQ improvement > 0.22 (p = 0.029), and lower average DAS28 during the first trimester since treatment initiation (p = 0.001) independently predicted grouping into pRLDA. Conclusions In clinical practice, RA patients with pMDA while on bDMARDs have adverse long-term outcomes compared to lower disease activity status, while heterogeneity exists within the pMDA group in terms of 5-year functionality and SAEs. Targeted studies to better characterize pMDA subgroups are needed, in order to assist clinicians in tailoring treatments.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irini Genitsaridi ◽  
Irini Flouri ◽  
Dimitris Plexousakis ◽  
Konstantinos Marias ◽  
Kyriaki Boki ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The long-term outcome of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who in clinical practice exhibit persistent moderate disease activity (pMDA) despite treatment with biologics has not been adequately studied. Herein, we analyzed the 5-year outcome of the pMDA group and assessed for within-group heterogeneity. Methods We included longitudinally-monitored RA patients from the Hellenic Registry of Biologic Therapies with persistent (cumulative time ≥50% of a 5-year period) moderate (pMDA, 3.2<DAS28≤5.1) or remission/low (pRLDA, DAS28≤3.2) disease activity. The former was further classified into persistent lower-moderate (plMDA, DAS28<4.2) and higher-moderate (phMDA, DAS28≥4.2) subgroups. Five-year trajectories of functionality (HAQ) was the primary outcome in comparing pRLDA versus pMDA and assessing heterogeneity within the pMDA subgroups through multivariable mixed-effect regression. We further compared serious adverse events (SAEs) occurrence between the two groups.Results We identified 295 patients with pMDA and 90 patients with pRLDA, the former group comprising of plMDA (n=133, 45%) and phMDA (n=162, 55%). pMDA was associated with worse 5-year functionality trajectory than pRLDA (+0.27 HAQ units, CI 95% +0.22 to +0.33; p<0.0001), while the phMDA subgroup had worse 5-year functionality than plMDA (+0.26 HAQ units, CI 95% 0.18 to 0.36; p<0.0001). Importantly, higher persistent disease activity was associated with more SAEs [pRLDA: 0.2±0.48 vs pMDA: 0.5±0.96, p=0.006; plMDA: 0.32 ±0.6 vs phMDA: 0.64 ±1.16, p=0.038)]. Male gender (p=0.017), lower baseline DAS28 (p<0.001), HAQ improvement >0.22 (p=0.029) and lower average DAS28 during the first trimester since treatment initiation (p=0.001), independently predicted grouping into pRLDA. Conclusions In clinical practice, RA patients with pMDA while on bDMARDs have adverse long-term outcomes compared to lower disease activity status, while heterogeneity exists within the pMDA group in terms of 5-year functionality and SAEs. Targeted studies to better characterize pMDA subgroups are needed, in order to assist clinicians in tailoring treatments.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1162.2-1162
Author(s):  
E. Pogozheva ◽  
A. Karateev ◽  
V. Amirdzhanova ◽  
E. Filatova

Objectives:to evaluate the efficacy of long-term pain therapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an initially moderate disease activity (DAS 28 <5,1).Methods:the study included 404 RA patients, disease duration was more than 1 year, mean DAS 28 3.7±1.6, mean age 58.6±10.0 years, 69% women, 76,7% RF “+”, 81,5% ACPA “+”. 91,2% of the patients received conventional DMARDs (methotrexate), 8,8% - biological agents. All patients received NSAIDs (aceclofenac) to control their symptoms. Тhe follow-up period was 6 months. We evaluated the dynamics of the DAS 28 index, the level of pain and patient global health on a 100- mm visual analog scale (VAS).Results:the level of pain (VAS) decreased from 63,1 ± 15,4 to 46,3± 8,3 (p=0,001) by 3 months of follow-up and up to 39,5± 11,2 (p= 0,001) by 6 months of follow-up. The patient global health (VAS) also improved from 58,2 ± 13,4 at baseline to 40,3 ± 11,2 (p=0,001) at 3 months and to 35,5 ± 9,7 (p=0,001) at 6 months of follow up. The mean DAS 28 remained within the moderate disease activity and decreased from 3,7±1,5 to 3,4 ±1,1 (p=0,01) after 3 months, and to 3,1± 0,9 (p=0,01) after 6 months.Conclusion:long-term NSAID therapy allows to control the disease activity in patients with moderate RA. This should be taken into account when planning therapy, including deciding whether to “switch” DMARDs and prescribing biological agents.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 561.2-562
Author(s):  
X. Liu ◽  
Z. Sun ◽  
W. Guo ◽  
F. Wang ◽  
L. Song ◽  
...  

Background:Experts emphasize early diagnosis and treatment in RA, but the widely used diagnostic criterias fail to meet the accurate judgment of early rheumatoid arthritis. In 2012, Professor Zhanguo Li took the lead in establishing ERA “Chinese standard”, and its sensitivity and accuracy have been recognized by peers. However, the optimal first-line treatment of patients (pts) with undifferentiated arthritis (UA), early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are yet to be established.Objectives:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Iguratimod-based (IGU-based) Strategy in the above three types of pts, and to explore the characteristics of the effects of IGU monotherapy and combined treatment.Methods:This prospective cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01548001) was conducted in China. In this phase 4 study pts with RA (ACR 1987 criteria[1]), ERA (not match ACR 1987 criteria[1] but match ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria[2] or 2014 ERA criteria[3]), UA (not match classification criteria for ERA and RA but imaging suggests synovitis) were recruited. We applied different treatments according to the patient’s disease activity at baseline, including IGU monotherapy and combination therapies with methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, and prednisone. Specifically, pts with LDA and fewer poor prognostic factors were entered the IGU monotherapy group (25 mg bid), and pts with high disease activity were assigned to combination groups. A Chi-square test was applied for comparison. The primary outcomes were the proportion of pts in remission (REM)or low disease activity (LDA) that is DAS28-ESR<2.6 or 3.2 at 24 weeks, as well as the proportion of pts, achieved ACR20, Boolean remission, and good or moderate EULAR response (G+M).Results:A total of 313 pts (26 pts with UA, 59 pts with ERA, and 228 pts with RA) were included in this study. Of these, 227/313 (72.5%) pts completed the 24-week follow-up. The results showed that 115/227 (50.7%), 174/227 (76.7%), 77/227 (33.9%), 179/227 (78.9%) pts achieved DAS28-ESR defined REM and LDA, ACR20, Boolean remission, G+M response, respectively. All parameters continued to decrease in all pts after treatment (Fig 1).Compared with baseline, the three highest decline indexes of disease activity at week 24 were SW28, CDAI, and T28, with an average decline rate of 73.8%, 61.4%, 58.7%, respectively. Results were similar in three cohorts.We performed a stratified analysis of which IGU treatment should be used in different cohorts. The study found that the proportion of pts with UA and ERA who used IGU monotherapy were significantly higher than those in the RA cohort. While the proportion of triple and quadruple combined use of IGU in RA pts was significantly higher than that of ERA and UA at baseline and whole-course (Fig 2).A total of 81/313 (25.8%) pts in this study had adverse events (AE) with no serious adverse events. The main adverse events were infection(25/313, 7.99%), gastrointestinal disorders(13/313, 4.15%), liver dysfunction(12/313, 3.83%) which were lower than 259/2666 (9.71%) in the previous Japanese phase IV study[4].The most common reasons of lost follow-up were: 1) discontinued after remission 25/86 (29.1%); 2) lost 22/86 (25.6%); 3) drug ineffective 19/86 (22.1%).Conclusion:Both IGU-based monotherapy and combined therapies are tolerant and effective for treating UA, ERA, and RA, while the decline in joint symptoms was most significant. Overall, IGU combination treatments were most used in RA pts, while monotherapy was predominant in ERA and UA pts.References:[1]Levin RW, et al. Scand J Rheumatol 1996, 25(5):277-281.[2]Kay J, et al. Rheumatology 2012, 51(Suppl 6):vi5-9.[3]Zhao J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2014, 32(5):667-673.[4]Mimori T, et al. Mod Rheumatol 2019, 29(2):314-323.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


The Lancet ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 329 (8542) ◽  
pp. 1108-1111 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.L. Scott ◽  
B.L. Coulton ◽  
D.P.M. Symmons ◽  
A.J. Popert

1996 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 361 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Holmes ◽  
Katherine Detre ◽  
Wan Lin Weh ◽  
Spencer King ◽  
Sheryl Kelsey

Author(s):  
Nyi Mekar Saptarini ◽  
Dainar Eka Pratiwi ◽  
Ellin Febrina ◽  
Marlia Singgih Wibowo ◽  
Tutus Gusdinar

ABSTRACTObjective: This study was designed to determine the correlation between Disease Activity Score (DAS 28) and the serum Cartilage Oligomeric MatrixProtein (COMP) levels in Indonesian Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients. Methods: The subjects were patients who visit the rheumatology clinic at one governmental hospital in Bandung, Indonesia. DAS was determinedby the QxMD Software based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and serum COMP levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.Statistical analysis was conducted with IBM SPSS Statistics 23. Results: DAS 28 value was 3.36 ± 0.16 which indicates the moderate disease activity. Serum COMP levels were 843.80 ± 35.79 ng/ml in RA patientsand 830.00 ± 48.92 ng/ml in normal controls. Conclusion: There is no correlation between DAS 28 and serum COMP levels in RA patients (p = 0.496 and rho = 0.129). Keywords: Autoimmune disease, Rheumatoid arthritis monitoring, Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein, Disease activity score 28


2008 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klemmens Trieb ◽  
Maximillian Schmid ◽  
Thomas Stulnig ◽  
Wolfgang Huber ◽  
Axel Wanivenhaus

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document