Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy For Renal Tumors With A RENAL Nephrometry Score≥7: A System Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background To compare the perioperative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for complex renal tumors with a RENAL nephrometry score≥7. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register for studies from 2000 to 2020 to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of RPN and LPN in patients with a RENAL nephrometry score≥7. We used RevMan 5.2 to pool the data. Results Seven studies were acquired in our study. No significant differences were found in the estimated blood loss (WMD: 34.49; 95% CI: -75.16-144.14; p=0.54), hospital stay (WMD: -0.59; 95% CI: -1.24–0.06; p=0.07), positive surgical margin (OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.65–1.11; p =0.23), major postoperative complications(OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.52–1.54; p=0.69) and transfusion (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.48–1.08; p =0.11) between the groups. RPN showed better outcomes in the operating time (WMD: -22.45; 95% CI: -35.06 to -9.85; p=0.0005), postoperative renal function (WMD: 3.32; 95% CI: 0.73–5.91; p=0.01), warm ischemia time (WMD: -6.96; 95% CI: -7.30–-6.62; p <0.0001), conversion rate to radical nephrectomy (OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.66; p=0.002) and intraoperative complications (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.28–0.97; p=0.04).Conclusions RPN showed better perioperative clinical outcomes than LPN for the treatment of complex renal tumors with a RENAL nephrometry score≥7.

Download Full-text

Comparison Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for Complex Renal Tumors (with a RENAL nephrometry score≥7): a meta-analysis

10.21203/rs.3.rs-90761/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Yu-Li Jiang ◽

Xin Xiao ◽

Fu-Sheng Peng ◽

Tian-Li Shi ◽

Xiao-Hui Huang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Operating Time ◽

Surgical Margin ◽

Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Renal Tumors ◽

Perioperative Outcomes ◽

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Cochrane Central Register ◽

Intraoperative Complication ◽

Estimated Blood Loss

Abstract BackgroundTo compare the perioperative outcomes of Robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register for studies from 2000 to 2020 to evaluate the perioperative outcomes RPN and LPN in patients with a RENALnephrometry score≥7. We used RevMan 5.2 to pool the data. ResultsSeven studies were acquired in our study. No significant differences were found in the estimated blood loss (WMD: WMD: 34.49, 95% CI -75.16-144.14, p=0.54), hospital stay (WMD: -0.59 95% CI -1.24–0.06, p=0.07), operating time (WMD: -22.45, 95%CI: -35.06 to-9.85, ), postive surgical margin (OR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.65–1.11, p =0.23) and transfusion (OR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.48–1.08, p =0.11).between the two groups. RPN get better outcomes in postoperative renal function (WMD: 3.32, 95% CI 0.73–5.91, p=0.01), warm ischenia time (WMD: -6.96, 95% CI -7.30–-6.62, p <0.0001), conversion( OR: 0.34, 95%CI: 0.17 to 0.66, p=0.002) and intraoperative complication (OR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.28–0.97, p=0.04).ConclusionRPN could get better perioerative clinical outcomes than LPN for treatment of Complex Renal Tumors( with a RENALnephrometry score≥7).

Download Full-text

Analysis of predictors of adherent perinephric fat and its impact on perioperative outcomes in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a retrospective case–control study

World Journal of Surgical Oncology ◽

10.1186/s12957-021-02429-6 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Lu Fang ◽

Huan Li ◽

Tao Zhang ◽

Rui Liu ◽

Taotao Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Warm Ischemia ◽

Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Renal Tumors ◽

Perioperative Outcomes ◽

Transfusion Rate ◽

Estimated Blood Loss ◽

Perinephric Fat

Abstract Background Adherent perinephric fat (APF), characterized by inflammatory fat surrounding the kidney, can limit the isolation of renal tumors and increase the operative difficulty in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). The aim of this study was to investigate the predictors of APF and its impact on perioperative outcomes during LPN. Methods A total of 215 consecutive patients undergoing LPN for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from January 2017 to June 2019 at our institute were included. We divided these patients into two groups according to the presence of APF. Radiographic data were retrospectively collected from preoperative cross-sectional imaging. The perioperative clinical parameters were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the predictive factors of APF. Results APF was identified in 41 patients (19.1%) at the time of LPN. Univariate analysis demonstrated that APF was significantly correlated with the male gender (P = 0.001), higher body mass index (P = 0.002), lower preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.004), greater posterior perinephric fat thickness (P< 0.001), greater perinephric stranding (P< 0.001), and higher Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score (P< 0.001). The MAP score (P< 0.001) was the only variable that remained an independent predictor for APF in multivariate analysis. We found that patients with APF had longer operative times (P< 0.001), warm ischemia times (P = 0.001), and greater estimated blood loss (P = 0.003) than those without APF. However, there were no significant differences in surgical approach, transfusion rate, length of postoperative stay, complication rate, or surgical margin between the two groups. Conclusions Several specific clinical and radiographic factors including the MAP score can predict APF. The presence of APF is associated with an increased operative time, warm ischemia time, and greater estimated blood loss but has no impact on other perioperative outcomes in LPN.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Complex Renal Tumors (RENAL Nephrometry Score of 7 or Higher)

Korean Journal of Urology ◽

10.4111/kju.2014.55.12.808 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 55 (12) ◽

pp. 808 ◽

Cited By ~ 17

Author(s):

Hyeon Jun Jang ◽

Wan Song ◽

Yoon Seok Suh ◽

U Seok Jeong ◽

Hwang Gyun Jeon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Renal Tumors ◽

Perioperative Outcomes ◽

Nephrometry Score

Download Full-text

Safety and efficacy of retroperitoneal sutureless zero ischemia laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for low nephrometry score masses

Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia ◽

10.4081/aiua.2019.3.157 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 91 (3) ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Emanuele Corongiu ◽

Pietro Grande ◽

Angelo Di Santo ◽

Giorgio Pagliarella ◽

Stefano Squillacciotti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Intraoperative Complications ◽

Functional Results ◽

Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Tumor Diameter ◽

Selective Embolization ◽

Renal Masses ◽

Nephrometry Score ◽

Estimated Blood Loss ◽

Zero Ischemia

Objectives: To evaluate oncological feasibility and oncological and functional results of retroperitoneal sutureless zero ischemia laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Patients and methods: Patients with posterior renal masses with low nephrometry score (RENAL ≤ 7) treated who underwent retroperitoneal sutureless zero ischemia.in a single center from January 2016 to November 2017. Clinical, surgical and pathological data were prospectively collected. Complications were reported according to the modified Clavien classification. Results: Retroperitoneal sutureless zero ischemia laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was performed on 15 patients. The indication for nephron-sparing surgery was elective in 11 (73%) patients and imperative in 4 (27%). Median RENAL score was 5 (IQR: 5-7), median tumor diameter 25 mm (IQR: 20-35). In 11 cases, the tumor was located polar (85%), and in 2 cases hilar (15%). There were no intraoperative complications. No cases were converted to radical nephrectomy, and in no case parenchyma suture was necessary. Median operative time was 90 min (IQR:40-150), in no case clamping of the renal artery was necessary, median hospital stay was 4 days, median estimated blood loss (EBL) was 310 (180-500) ml. Pathological analysis showed renal cell carcinoma in 11 patients (85%), 9 (60%) staged T1a and 2 (13%) T1b. In 4 (27%) an oncocytoma was found. There were no positive surgical margins. One patient developed a major postoperative complication (postoperative renal bleeding requiring super-selective embolization). Trifecta rate was 93%. Conclusions: Sutureless retroperitoneal zero ischemia LPN for the treatment of low-complexity posterior renal masses showed to be safe and feasible. Longer follow-up and higher numbers of patients are, however, warranted to draw definitive conclusions on functional outcomes.

Download Full-text

Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for small renal tumours

Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia ◽

10.4081/aiua.2017.2.93 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 89 (2) ◽

pp. 93 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Abdulmuttalip Simsek ◽

Abdullah Hizir Yavuzsan ◽

Yunus Colakoglu ◽

Arda Atar ◽

Selcuk Sahin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Functional Outcomes ◽

Surgical Margin ◽

Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Positive Surgical Margin ◽

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Asa Score ◽

Estimated Blood Loss ◽

Renal Tumours ◽

Significant Difference

Objective: To evaluate a single surgeon oncological and functional outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) compared to robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) for pT1a renal tumours. Materials and methods: Between 2006 and 2016, a retrospective review of 42 patients who underwent LPN (n = 20) or RPN (n = 22) by same surgeon was performed. Patients were matched for gender, age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score, tumour side, RENAL and PADUA scores, peri-operative and post-operative outcomes. Results: There was no significant differences between the two groups with respect to patient gender, age, BMI, ASA score, tumours side, RENAL and PADUA scores. Mean operative time for RPN was 176 vs. 227 minutes for LPN (p = 0.001). Warm ischemia time was similar in both groups (p = 0.58). Estimated blood loss (EBL) was higher in the LPN. There was no significant difference with preoperative and postoperative creatinine and percent change in eGFR levels. Only one case in LPN had positive surgical margin. Conclusions: RPN is a developing procedure, and technically feasible and safe for small-size renal tumours. Moreover RPN is a comparable and alternative operation to LPN, providing equivalent oncological and functional outcomes, as well as saving more healthy marginal tissue and easier and faster suturing.

Download Full-text

Analysis of Predictors of Adherent Perinephric fat and its Impact on Perioperative Outcomes in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Retrospective Case-control Study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-144111/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Lu Fang ◽

Huan Li ◽

Tao Zhang ◽

Rui Liu ◽

Taotao Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Warm Ischemia ◽

Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Renal Tumors ◽

Perioperative Outcomes ◽

Transfusion Rate ◽

Estimated Blood Loss ◽

Perinephric Fat

Abstract Background: Adherent perinephric fat (APF), characterized by inflammatory fat surrounding the kidney, can limit the isolation of renal tumors and increase the operative difficulty in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). The aim of this study was to investigate the predictors of APF and its impact on perioperative outcomes during LPN.Methods: A total of 215 consecutive patients undergoing LPN for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from January 2016 to June 2019 at our institute were included. We divided these patients into two groups according to the presence of APF. Radiographic data were retrospectively collected from preoperative cross-sectional imaging. The perioperative clinical parameters were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the predictive factors of APF. Results: APF was observed in 41 patients (19.1%) at the time of LPN. Univariate analysis demonstrated that APF was significantly correlated with male gender (P = 0.001), higher body mass index (P = 0.002), lower preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.004), greater posterior perinephric fat thickness (P < 0.001), greater perinephric stranding (P < 0.001) and higher Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score (P < 0.001). The MAP score (P < 0.001) was the only variable that remained an independent predictor for APF in multivariate analysis. We found that patients with APF had longer operative times (P < 0.001), warm ischemia times (P = 0.001), and greater estimated blood loss (P = 0.003) than those without APF. However, there were no significant differences in surgical approach, transfusion rate, length of postoperative stay, complication rate or surgical margin between the two groups.Conclusions: Several specific clinical and radiographic factors including the MAP score can predict APF. The presence of APF is associated with an increased operative time, and warm ischemia time and greater estimated blood loss but has no impact on other perioperative outcomes in LPN.

Download Full-text

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy with the Da Vinci Xi

Advances in Urology ◽

10.1155/2016/9675095 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 2016 ◽

pp. 1-5 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

George J. S. Kallingal ◽

Sanjaya Swain ◽

Fadi Darwiche ◽

Sanoj Punnen ◽

Murugesan Manoharan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Da Vinci ◽

Intraoperative Complications ◽

Perioperative Outcomes ◽

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Da Vinci Xi ◽

Port Placement ◽

Renal Masses ◽

Estimated Blood Loss ◽

Surgical Platform

Purpose.The surgical expertise to perform robotic partial nephrectomy is heavily dependent on technology. The Da Vinci Xi (XI) is the latest robotic surgical platform with significant advancements compared to its predecessor. We describe our operative technique and experience with the XI system for robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN).Materials and Methods.Patients with clinical T1 renal masses were offered RPN with the XI. We used laser targeting, autopositioning, and a novel “in-line” port placement to perform RPN.Results.15 patients underwent RPN with the XI. There were no intraoperative complications and no operative conversions. Mean console time was 101.3 minutes (range 44–176 minutes). Mean ischemia time was 17.5 minutes and estimated blood loss was 120 mLs. 12 of 15 patients had renal cell carcinoma. Two patients had oncocytoma and one had benign cystic disease. All patients had negative surgical margins and pathologic T1 disease. Two postoperative complications were encountered, including one patient who developed a pseudoaneurysm and one readmitted for presumed urinary tract infection.Conclusions.RPN with the XI system can be safely performed. Combining our surgical technique with the technological advancements on the XI offers patients acceptable pathologic and perioperative outcomes.

Download Full-text

Association between R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score and perioperative outcomes following open partial nephrectomy under cold ischemia

Canadian Urological Association Journal ◽

10.5489/cuaj.1372 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 8 (3-4) ◽

pp. 137

Author(s):

Dong Soo Park ◽

Jin Ho Hwang ◽

Moon Hyung Kang ◽

Jong Jin Oh

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Perioperative Outcomes ◽

Renal Neoplasm ◽

Cold Ischemia ◽

Ischemic Time ◽

Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Cold Ischemic Time ◽

Nephrometry Score ◽

Estimated Blood Loss

Introduction: We investigate the clinical significance of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score for renal neoplasm following open partial nephrectomy (PN) under cold ischemia.Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using clinical data of 98 consecutive patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma who underwent open PN by a single surgeon from December 2000 to September 2012. Tumour complexity was stratified into 3 categories: low (4-6), moderate (7-9) and high (10-12) complexity. Perioperative outcomes, such as complications, cold ischemic time, estimated blood loss and renal function, were analyzed according to the complexity by NS. Complications were stratified using the Clavien-Dindo classification system.Results: Tumour complexity according to nephrometry score was assessed as low in 16 (16.3%), moderate in 48 (49.0%) and high in 34 (34.7%). The median cold ischemic time did not differ significantly among the 3 groups (36.0 minutes in low-, 40 minutes in moderate- and 43 minutes in the high-complexity group, p = 0.421). Total complications did not differ significantly (2 (2.0%) in low, 4 (4.1%) in moderate and 4 (4.1%) in high, p = 0.984). Each Grade 3 complication occurred in the moderate (urine leakage) and high groups (lymphocele). Postoperative renal functional outcomes were similar among the groups (p = 0.729). Only mean estimated blood loss was significantly different with nephrometry score (p = 0.049).Conclusions: The nephrometry score, as used in an open PN series under cold ischemia, was not significantly associated with perioperative outcomes (i.e., ischemia time, complications, renal functional preservation).

Download Full-text

Tumor volume and tumor crossing of the axial renal midline predict renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-01539-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Haruyuki Ohsugi ◽

Kyojiro Akiyama ◽

Hisanori Taniguchi ◽

Masaaki Yanishi ◽

Motohiko Sugi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Function ◽

Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Tumor Volume ◽

Characteristic Curve ◽

Three Dimensional ◽

Scoring Systems ◽

Renal Tumors ◽

Perioperative Outcomes ◽

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Perioperative Morbidity

AbstractThere are several nephrometry scoring systems for predicting surgical complexity and potential perioperative morbidity. The R.E.N.A.L. scoring system, one of the most well-known nephrometry scoring systems, emphasizes the features on which it is based (Radius, Exophytic/endophytic, Nearness to collecting system or sinus, Anterior/posterior, and Location relative to polar lines). The ability of these nephrometry scoring systems to predict loss of renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) remains controversial. Therefore, we verified which combination of factors from nephrometry scoring systems, including tumor volume, was the most significant predictor of postoperative renal function. Patients who underwent RPN for cT1 renal tumors in our hospital were reviewed retrospectively (n = 163). The preoperative clinical data (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], comorbidities, and nephrometry scoring systems including R.E.N.A.L.) and perioperative outcomes were evaluated. We also calculated the tumor volume using the equation applied to an ellipsoid by three-dimensional computed tomography. The primary outcome was reduced eGFR, which was defined as an eGFR reduction of ≥ 20% from baseline to 6 months after RPN. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationships between preoperative variables and reduced eGFR. Of 163 patients, 24 (14.7%) had reduced eGFR. Multivariable analyses indicated that tumor volume (cutoff value ≥ 14.11 cm3, indicating a sphere with a diameter ≥ approximately 3 cm) and tumor crossing of the axial renal midline were independent factors associated with a reduced eGFR (odds ratio [OR] 4.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69–12.30; P = 0.003 and OR 3.50; 95% CI 1.30–9.46; P = 0.034, respectively). Our classification system using these two factors showed a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) than previous nephrometry scoring systems (AUC = 0.786 vs. 0.653–0.719), and it may provide preoperative information for counseling patients about renal function after RPN.

Download Full-text

Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumours in obese patients: Perioperative outcomes in a multi-institutional analysis

Canadian Urological Association Journal ◽

10.5489/cuaj.3197 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 9 (11-12) ◽

pp. 859 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Newaj Abdullah ◽

Deepansh Dalela ◽

Ravi Barod ◽

Jeff Larson ◽

Michael Johnson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Regression Analysis ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Operative Time ◽

Independent Predictor ◽

Operating Time ◽

Perioperative Outcomes ◽

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Obese Patients ◽

Estimated Blood Loss

Introduction: We sought to evaluate the association of obesity with surgical outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) using a large, multicentre database. Methods: We identified 1836 patients who underwent RPN from five academic centres from 2006-2014. A total of 806 patients were obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m2). Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between obese and non-obese patients. Multivariable analysis was used to assess the association of obesity on RPN outcomes.Results: A total of 806 (44%) patients were obese with median BMI of 33.8kg/m2. Compared to non-obese patients, obese patients had greater median tumour size (2.9 vs. 2.5 cm, p<0.001), mean RENAL nephrometry score (7.3 vs. 7.1, p = 0.04), median operating time (176 vs. 165 min, p=0.002), and median estimated blood loss (EBL, 150 vs. 100 ml, p=0.002), but no difference in complications. Obesity was not an independent predictor of operative time or EBL on regression analysis. Among obese patients, males had a greater EBL (150 vs. 100 ml, p<0.001), operative time (180 vs. 166 min, p<0.001) and warm ischemia time (WIT, 20 vs. 18, p=0.001) and male sex was an independent predictor of these outcomes on regression analysis.Conclusion: In this large, multicentre study on RPN, obesity was not associated with increased complications and was not an independent predictor of operating time or blood loss. However, in obese patients, male gender was an independent predictor of greater EBL, operative time, and WIT. Our results indicate that obesity alone should not preclude consideration for RPN.

Download Full-text