scholarly journals Tumor volume and tumor crossing of the axial renal midline predict renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruyuki Ohsugi ◽  
Kyojiro Akiyama ◽  
Hisanori Taniguchi ◽  
Masaaki Yanishi ◽  
Motohiko Sugi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Perioperative Morbidity

AbstractThere are several nephrometry scoring systems for predicting surgical complexity and potential perioperative morbidity. The R.E.N.A.L. scoring system, one of the most well-known nephrometry scoring systems, emphasizes the features on which it is based (Radius, Exophytic/endophytic, Nearness to collecting system or sinus, Anterior/posterior, and Location relative to polar lines). The ability of these nephrometry scoring systems to predict loss of renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) remains controversial. Therefore, we verified which combination of factors from nephrometry scoring systems, including tumor volume, was the most significant predictor of postoperative renal function. Patients who underwent RPN for cT1 renal tumors in our hospital were reviewed retrospectively (n = 163). The preoperative clinical data (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], comorbidities, and nephrometry scoring systems including R.E.N.A.L.) and perioperative outcomes were evaluated. We also calculated the tumor volume using the equation applied to an ellipsoid by three-dimensional computed tomography. The primary outcome was reduced eGFR, which was defined as an eGFR reduction of ≥ 20% from baseline to 6 months after RPN. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationships between preoperative variables and reduced eGFR. Of 163 patients, 24 (14.7%) had reduced eGFR. Multivariable analyses indicated that tumor volume (cutoff value ≥ 14.11 cm3, indicating a sphere with a diameter ≥ approximately 3 cm) and tumor crossing of the axial renal midline were independent factors associated with a reduced eGFR (odds ratio [OR] 4.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69–12.30; P = 0.003 and OR 3.50; 95% CI 1.30–9.46; P = 0.034, respectively). Our classification system using these two factors showed a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) than previous nephrometry scoring systems (AUC = 0.786 vs. 0.653–0.719), and it may provide preoperative information for counseling patients about renal function after RPN.

Tumor Volume and Tumor Crossing of the Axial Renal Midline as Preoperative Predictors of Reduced Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate After Robotic Partial Nephrectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruyuki Ohsugi ◽  
Kyojiro Akiyama ◽  
Hisanori Taniguchi ◽  
Masaaki Yanishi ◽  
Motohiko Sugi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy

Abstract The ability of nephrometry scoring systems, including the radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, and location relative to polar lines (R.E.N.A.L.), to predict loss of renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is still controversial. Therefore, we verified which combination of factors from nephrometry scoring systems, including tumor volume, was the most significant predictor of postoperative renal function. Patients who underwent RPN for cT1 renal tumors in our hospital were reviewed retrospectively (n=163). The preoperative clinical data (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], comorbidities, and nephrometry scoring systems including R.E.N.A.L.) and perioperative outcomes were evaluated. We also calculated the tumor volume using the equation applied to an ellipsoid by three-dimensional computed tomography. The primary outcome was reduced eGFR, which was defined as an eGFR reduction of ≥20% from baseline to 6 months after RPN. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationships between preoperative variables and reduced eGFR. Of 163 patients, 24 (14.7%) had reduced eGFR. Multivariate analyses indicated that tumor volume (cutoff value≥14.11 cm3, indicating a sphere with a diameter≥approximately 3 cm) and tumor crossing of the axial renal midline were independent factors for reduced eGFR (odds ratio [OR], 4.57; P=0.003 and OR, 3.21; P=0.034, respectively). Our classification system using these two factors showed a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) than previous nephrometry scoring systems (AUC=0.786 vs. 0.653–0.719), and it may provide preoperative information for counseling patients about renal function after RPN.

Does teaching of robotic partial nephrectomy affect renal function and perioperative outcomes?

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 227-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yannick Cerantola ◽  
Guillaume Ploussard ◽  
Wassim Kassouf ◽  
Maurice Anidjar ◽  
Franck Bladou
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy

scholarly journals Comparison Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for Complex Renal Tumors (with a RENAL nephrometry score≥7): a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Li Jiang ◽  
Xin Xiao ◽  
Fu-Sheng Peng ◽  
Tian-Li Shi ◽  
Xiao-Hui Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Intraoperative Complication ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Abstract BackgroundTo compare the perioperative outcomes of Robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register for studies from 2000 to 2020 to evaluate the perioperative outcomes RPN and LPN in patients with a RENALnephrometry score≥7. We used RevMan 5.2 to pool the data. ResultsSeven studies were acquired in our study. No significant differences were found in the estimated blood loss (WMD: WMD: 34.49, 95% CI -75.16-144.14, p=0.54), hospital stay (WMD: -0.59 95% CI -1.24–0.06, p=0.07), operating time (WMD: -22.45, 95%CI: -35.06 to-9.85, ), postive surgical margin (OR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.65–1.11, p =0.23) and transfusion (OR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.48–1.08, p =0.11).between the two groups. RPN get better outcomes in postoperative renal function (WMD: 3.32, 95% CI 0.73–5.91, p=0.01), warm ischenia time (WMD: -6.96, 95% CI -7.30–-6.62, p <0.0001), conversion( OR: 0.34, 95%CI: 0.17 to 0.66, p=0.002) and intraoperative complication (OR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.28–0.97, p=0.04).ConclusionRPN could get better perioerative clinical outcomes than LPN for treatment of Complex Renal Tumors( with a RENALnephrometry score≥7).

scholarly journals Comparison of three dimensional reconstruction and conventional computer tomography angiography in patients undergoing zero-ischemia laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaorong Wu ◽  
Chen Jiang ◽  
Guangyu Wu ◽  
Chao Shen ◽  
Qibo Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
3D Reconstruction ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Feeding Artery ◽  
Zero Ischemia ◽  
Computer Tomography Angiography ◽  
Conventional Computer

Abstract Background: Advances in the three dimensional (3D) reconstruction and printing technology have fueled a rapidly growing interest in its applications in the field of urology. To our knowledge, the experience on the use of 3D reconstruction to facilitate zero-ischemia partial nephrectomy (PN) remains sparse and the role of 3D reconstruction is still needed to be defined. This study aimed to assess the role of three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and conventional computer tomography angiography (CTA) in zero-ischemia laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Methods: A total of 60 consecutive patients undergoing zero-ischemia LPN between October 2017 and March 2018 underwent CTA (CTA group including 30 patients) and 3D reconstruction (3D group including the remaining 30 patients) were included. 3D reconstruction and CTA images were prepared which were used to demonstrate the number and spatial interrelationships of the location of renal tumors and tumor feeding arteries. These radiology findings were directly correlated with intraoperative surgical findings at laparoscopy. Demographics, perioperative characteristics and renal function were compared between groups. Results: CTA and 3D reconstruction were successfully performed without any related complications. All the procedures were performed successfully without conversion to main renal artery clamping. Preoperative 3D reconstruction identified that 15 patients had only one tumor feeding artery, 12 had two, and another 3 had three, while the conventional CTA revealed that 22 patients had one tumor feeding artery, 8 had two (P>0.05). The mean operation time was shorter and estimated blood loss was less in the 3D group (P<0.05). 3D reconstruction group resulted in more accurate dissection of tumor artery (91.7%) as compared to conventional CTA (84.2%). There were no statistical differences in the baseline characteristics and renal function outcomes between two groups. Conclusions: 3D reconstruction can provide comprehensive information for the preoperative evaluation and intraoperative orientation that may facilitate tumor resection during zero-ischemia LPN for renal tumors.

scholarly journals Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy For Renal Tumors With A RENAL Nephrometry Score≥7: A System Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Biao Zhou ◽  
Xin Xiao ◽  
Tian-Li Shi ◽  
Xiao-Hui Huang ◽  
Yu-Li Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Positive Surgical Margin ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Nephrometry Score ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Abstract Background To compare the perioperative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for complex renal tumors with a RENAL nephrometry score≥7. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register for studies from 2000 to 2020 to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of RPN and LPN in patients with a RENAL nephrometry score≥7. We used RevMan 5.2 to pool the data. Results Seven studies were acquired in our study. No significant differences were found in the estimated blood loss (WMD: 34.49; 95% CI: -75.16-144.14; p=0.54), hospital stay (WMD: -0.59; 95% CI: -1.24–0.06; p=0.07), positive surgical margin (OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.65–1.11; p =0.23), major postoperative complications(OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.52–1.54; p=0.69) and transfusion (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.48–1.08; p =0.11) between the groups. RPN showed better outcomes in the operating time (WMD: -22.45; 95% CI: -35.06 to -9.85; p=0.0005), postoperative renal function (WMD: 3.32; 95% CI: 0.73–5.91; p=0.01), warm ischemia time (WMD: -6.96; 95% CI: -7.30–-6.62; p <0.0001), conversion rate to radical nephrectomy (OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.66; p=0.002) and intraoperative complications (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.28–0.97; p=0.04).Conclusions RPN showed better perioperative clinical outcomes than LPN for the treatment of complex renal tumors with a RENAL nephrometry score≥7.

scholarly journals Clinical Study of Three-Dimensional Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Highly Complex Renal Tumors with RENAL Nephrometry Scores of ≥10 Points

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Maomao Li ◽  
Yu Ren ◽  
Guobin Weng
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Ischemic Time ◽  
Perioperative Complication

Aims. To examine the safety and feasibility of three-dimensional (3-D) laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinically complex renal tumors. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 76 patients who underwent a 3-D ( n = 42 ; age, 54.6 ± 12.2 years) or two-dimensional (2-D) laparoscopic partial nephrectomy ( n = 34 ; age, 54.8 ± 13.2 years) for renal tumors with RENAL nephrectomy scores of ≥10 points from the same surgical group between January 2017 and April 2020 in Ningbo Urology and Nephrology Hospital. Mean tumor diameter, operation time, warm ischemic time, amount of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization time, hospitalization cost, perioperative complication rate, and renal function were compared. Results. The operation time ( 154.6 ± 45.1  min) and warm ischemic time ( 22.5 ± 6.8  min) in the 3-D laparoscopic group were significantly lower than those in the 2-D laparoscopic group ( 193.0 ± 59.2  min, p = 0.001 and 28.7 ± 7.8  min, p = 0.0002 , respectively). No significant differences in amount of intraoperative blood loss ( p = 0.642 ), length of postoperative hospital stay ( p = 0.541 ), perioperative complication rate ( p = 0.860 ), total hospital cost ( p = 0.641 ), and renal function changes including estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine ( p > 0.05 ) were found between the two groups. Conclusion. Our preliminary experience showed that the 3-D laparoscopic imaging system significantly shortened the operation and renal ischemic times, which are more conducive to partial resection of highly complex renal tumors.

scholarly journals Trifecta Outcomes in Open, Laparoscopy or Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Does the Surgical Approach Matter?

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ketan Mehra ◽  
Ramanitharan Manikandan ◽  
Lalgudi Narayanan Dorairajan ◽  
Sreenivasan Sreerag ◽  
Amit Jain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Important Position ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Preoperative Creatinine

This retrospective study evaluated perioperative outcomes of open partial nephrectomy (OPN), laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and identified predictive factors of Trifecta achievement for renal tumors that underwent partial nephrectomy (PN) in a single institutional cohort. The study involved patients who underwent PN from January 2011 to July 2018. Trifecta was defined as absence of perioperative complications, no positive surgical margins, and ischemia time <30 min. Fifty-five PN procedures were reviewed: 28 OPN, 14 LPN, and 13 RAPN. OPN, LPN and RAPN had similar median tumor size (5.75, 5.25, and 5 cm), nephrometry score (7, 6, and 6), and preoperative creatinine (1.09, 1.1, and 1.1 mg/dl, respectively). Blood loss was higher for OPN (550 ml) than for LPN (400 ml) and RAPN (300 ml), P = 0.042. Drain was removed after 6 days in OPN which was higher than LPN and RAPN (4.5 and 4 days, respectively), P = 0.008. OPN, LPN, and RAPN had similar median operative time (190, 180, and 180 min, respectively), P = 0.438. Median postoperative stay for OPN, LPN, and RAPN was 5, 6.5, and 10 days, respectively. Trifecta outcomes of 73.1%, 64.3%, and 61.53% were achieved in OPN, LPN, and RAPN, respectively, P = 0.730. It was concluded that Trifecta outcomes had no significant difference among OPN, LPN, and RAPN. LPN can produce as good results as RAPN. Keeping in mind the cost-effectiveness, LPN holds an important position in developing countries where expenditure by patient is a major factor.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document