scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of Naoxintong Capsule for treating Chronic Stable Angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gao Huanjia ◽  
Cai Hairong ◽  
Zhuang Jieqin ◽  
Dai Xingzhen ◽  
Fu Xue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Angina Pectoris ◽  
Stable Angina ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Chronic Stable Angina ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide, Chronic stable angina (CSA) is the main symptom of myocardial ischemia, causes increased risk of major cardiovascular events such as sudden cardiac death and myocardial infarction.Naoxintong (NXT)Capsule is a classical traditional Chinese medication used to treat CSA, however, few evidence to support the wide utility of NXT capsule for the treatment of CSA .We design this study to evaluating the efficacy and safety of NXT capsule versus placebo in patients with CSA. Methods/design This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. A total of 260 eligible participants will be enrolled. The participants will be randomized assigned in an equal ratio to groups receiving either NXT or placebo for 12 weeks. After a 2-week run-in period, they will receive either NXT or placebo (3 pills, 3 times daily) for 12 weeks. The primary outcome is therapeutic efficacy. Secondary outcome measures include the quantitative score of TCM syndromes, severity grading of angina pectoris, the number of angina pectoris per week, nitroglycerin dosage, score of seattle angina scale, serum homocysteine, incidence of cardiovascular events. Safety outcomes and adverse events will be monitored throughout the trial. Discussion We designed this study in accordance with principles and regulations issued by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA). The results will provide clinical evidence of the efficacy and safety of NXT Capsule in the treatment of CSA. Trial registration: ChiCTR2000034871.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of Naoxintong capsule for treating chronic stable angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gao Huanjia ◽  
Cai Hairong ◽  
Zhuang Jieqin ◽  
Dai Xingzhen ◽  
Fu Xue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Angina Pectoris ◽  
Stable Angina ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Chronic Stable Angina ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide, Chronic stable angina (CSA) is the main symptom of myocardial ischemia, causes increased risk of major cardiovascular events such as sudden cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Naoxintong (NXT) capsule is a classical traditional Chinese medication used to treat CSA, however, few evidence to support the wide utility of NXT capsule for the treatment of CSA. We design this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NXT capsule versus placebo in patients with CSA. Methods/design This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. A total of 260 eligible participants will be enrolled. The participants will be randomized assigned in an equal ratio to groups receiving either NXT or placebo for 12 weeks. After a 2-week run-in period, they will receive either NXT or placebo (3 pills, 3 times daily) for 12 weeks. The primary outcome is therapeutic efficacy. Secondary outcome measures include the quantitative score of TCM syndromes, severity grading of angina pectoris, the number of angina pectoris per week, nitroglycerin dosage, score of Seattle angina scale, serum homocysteine, and incidence of cardiovascular events. Safety outcomes and adverse events will be monitored throughout the trial. Discussion We designed this study in accordance with principles and regulations issued by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA). The results will provide clinical evidence of the efficacy and safety of NXT Capsule in the treatment of CSA. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100044563. Registered on 24 March 2020.

scholarly journals Acupoint Application in Patients with Chronic Stable Angina Pectoris: Study Protocol of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yulan Ren ◽  
Dehua Li ◽  
Hui Zheng ◽  
Junling Lv ◽  
Junyan Leng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Angina Pectoris ◽  
Study Protocol ◽  
Stable Angina ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Chronic Stable Angina ◽  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Stable Angina Pectoris ◽  
Double Blind

Background. Chronic stable angina pectoris (CSAP) is a major syndrome of ischemic heart disease (IHD). CSAP manifests as chest pain or discomfort and affects patients’ quality of life. Acupoint application (AP) has been reported to be effective for managing the symptoms of CSAP, but the evidence is not convincing. Therefore, we designed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of AP in the treatment of CSAP.Methods and Analysis. Two hundred participants with CSAP will be randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 ratio into 4 groups. All participants will receive 12 sessions of treatment in 4 weeks and the same basic treatment procedure. The participants will be visited and assessed for 12 weeks, including a 4-week screening, a 4-week treatment phase, and a 4-week follow-up phase. The primary outcome is the change in the total frequency of self-reported angina attack at 4th week compared with the baseline. The secondary outcomes include the intensity of angina pain, consumption of nitroglycerin orSuxiao Jiuxinpills, CCS angina classification, SAQ, SAS and SDS score.Ethics. The study protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Sichuan Regional Ethics Review Committee on TCM (number 2013kl-001). This trial is registered with clinicaltrials.govNCT02029118.

scholarly journals A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of Huang Qi Gui Zhi Wu Wu Tang granules in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Liu ◽  
Yi-Ru Wang ◽  
Zhi-jie Xi ◽  
Yang Yu ◽  
Li Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Rate Of Change ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by swelling, pain, and synovial damage. Effective methods lack in the treatment of RA. A traditional prescription in use for thousands of years in China, Huang Qi Gui Zhi Wu Wu Tang (HQGZWWT) granule is still chosen to relive pain and prevent joint malformation in RA patients. However, no evidence-based medical research has been organized to assess the effectiveness and safety of HQGZWWT granules for RA. Methods/design: We will conduct a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to determine whether HQGZWWT granules can relieve pain and protect joints. We will randomly divide 120 patients with active arthritis for 3 months. Main measurements include ratio of 50 of ACR (American College of Rheumatology), change of DAS (28) from baseline to 3 months, and SHARP scores of van der Heijde from baseline to 12 months. SecondarymeasurementsincludeACR20, ACR70, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), arthritis pain score, and Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis. The time points are set as baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. In addition, the rate of change (score) in the ACR50 and DAS28 from the baseline to 2-week, 1-month, 2-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up are also the secondary outcome measures. Discussion: The findings of this research will elucidate the efficacy and safety of HQGZWWT granules and provide an alternative treatment for RA. In addition, our data will benefit the clinical decision-making on active RA and possibly be incorporated into future guidelines. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03593837. Keywords: Traditional Chinese medicine, Huang Qi Gui Zhi wu wu granules, placebo, active rheumatoid arthritis, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

scholarly journals Neurologic Safety of Etomidate-Based Sedation during Upper Endoscopy in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis Compared with Propofol: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 2424
Author(s):  
Jang Han Jung ◽  
Bomi Hyun ◽  
Jin Lee ◽  
Dong Hee Koh ◽  
Jung Hee Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Early Discharge ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Number Connection Test ◽  
Severe Degree

(1) Background: Although etomidate-based sedation is an effective and safe protocol in endoscopic procedures, there is a lack of evidence regarding the safety of etomidate in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). This study aimed to compare the neurologic safety and efficacy of etomidate and propofol for endoscopic sedation in patients with LC. (2) Methods: From December 2017 to December 2019, consecutive cirrhotic patients who underwent sedative endoscopy using either etomidate or propofol were randomly recruited. The primary endpoint was the number connection test (NCT), and the secondary endpoints included factors for the safety of sedatives during endoscopy. (3) Results: 63 patients were enrolled in each of the etomidate and propofol groups. The NCT times were significantly lower in the etomidate group than in the propofol group. Furthermore, severe or very severe degree of encephalopathy was higher in the propofol group but was not significantly different. Pharmacological properties and the overall incidence of respiratory and cardiovascular events did not differ significantly between the groups. (4) Conclusion: Etomidate-based sedation exacerbates neither subclinical nor overt hepatic encephalopathy. It guarantees efficacies similar to those of propofol regarding rapid sedation, fast recovery, and early discharge, with no increased risk of adverse respiratory or cardiovascular events in patients with LC.

scholarly journals Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Thai Herbal Formulation-6 in the Treatment of Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Randomized-Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Nut Koonrungsesomboon ◽  
Saowaros Nopnithipat ◽  
Supanimit Teekachunhatean ◽  
Natthakarn Chiranthanut ◽  
Chaichan Sangdee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Pain ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Common Adverse Event ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Osteoarthritis Of The Knee ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Short Term Treatment ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Herbal Formulation

Background. Osteoarthritis of the knee is the most common form of arthritis. Identifying effective and safe herbal formulations that are locally available is viewed as a priority for sustainable development in a region. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Thai herbal formulation-6 (THF-6) in comparison with oral diclofenac in patients with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis of the knee. Methods. This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, noninferiority trial randomly assigned patients with osteoarthritis of the knee to receive either THF-6 or diclofenac for four weeks. The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline in knee pain as measured by a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcome measures included knee stiffness, a stair climb test, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and safety parameters. Outcomes were assessed on a biweekly basis. Modified intention-to-treat (MITT) and perprotocol (PP) analyses were applied. Results. A total of 200 patients were enrolled of whom 175 (87.5%) were included in the MITT analysis and 153 (76.5%) in the PP analysis. The mean change in VAS pain did not differ between the two groups, and the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for comparison between the two groups was within the prespecified margin of 10 mm for noninferiority (MITT analysis: mean difference = 0.86, 95% CI = -4.39 to 6.10, p = 0.748 ; PP analysis: mean difference = 1.98, 95% CI = -3.61 to 7.56, p = 0.486 ). Significant improvement was observed in all the efficacy parameters in both groups. Dyspepsia was the most common adverse event: 23 patients in the THF-6 group and 28 in the diclofenac group p = 0.417 . Conclusions. THF-6 offers an alternative to oral diclofenac for the short-term treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. It was shown to be noninferior to oral diclofenac in relieving knee pain. This trial is registered with ChiCTR-IPR-15007213.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for prevention of migraine headache in Japanese patients with episodic migraine: A phase 2 randomized controlled clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 251581632093257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumihiko Sakai ◽  
Akichika Ozeki ◽  
Vladimir Skljarevski
Keyword(s):  
Migraine Headache ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Episodic Migraine ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Objective: This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab in comparison with placebo for the prevention of migraine in Japanese patients with episodic migraine. Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, which was conducted over 6 months, randomized adult patients received subcutaneous injections of galcanezumab (120 mg n = 115, 240 mg n = 114) or placebo ( n = 230) once monthly. The primary endpoint was the overall mean change from baseline in the number of monthly migraine headache days. The key secondary outcome measures were response rates (≥50%, ≥75%, and 100%); the Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive score; monthly migraine headache days requiring acute treatment; and Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S). Results: The mean change from baseline in monthly migraine headache days over months 1–6 was significantly ( p < 0.001) greater for the 120-mg galcanezumab dose (−3.60 days) and the 240-mg galcanezumab dose (−3.36 days) compared with placebo (−0.59 days). Both the 120-mg and 240-mg doses of galcanezumab were superior compared with placebo for each of the key secondary endpoints except for PGI-S (only the 240-mg dose was superior). The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were local injection-site reactions; erythema, swelling, pruritus, and pain were more commonly reported by patients who were treated with galcanezumab than those treated with placebo. Conclusion: The number of monthly migraine headache days was reduced with both doses of galcanezumab, and both doses were safe and well tolerated in Japanese patients with episodic migraine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document