scholarly journals Validation of the Norwegian Versions of the Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS) and the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) in a Mental Health Care Setting

Author(s):  
Nora Braathu ◽  
Erlend Høen Laukvik ◽  
Karina M. Egeland ◽  
Ane-Marthe Solheim Skar

Abstract Background: The implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) is of crucial importance in health care institutions and requires effective management from the leaders. However, there is a lack of sufficient assessment tools to evaluate the degree to which the employees´ rate how well their leaders are at implementing EBPs. This emphasizes the need for a validated and widely used implementation scale for EBPs. Methods: The current study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) and the Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS) in a Norwegian mental health care setting. Results: Results from confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the MLQ and ILS were valid instruments for measuring general and implementation leadership. The scales demonstrated good convergent validity. In addition, attitudes towards EBPs did not seem to be associated with the ILS and the MLQ, further supporting the applicability of the instruments. Conclusions: The two scales demonstrate good psychometric properties in a Norwegian mental health care setting, which suggests that the MLQ and ILS are valid and reliable tools for measuring leadership in an implementation setting. More research is highly needed to disentangle the link between perceived leadership and objective measures of successful implementation of EBPs. Trial registration: NSD 690133, NSD 60059/3/OOS

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
SunandaGovinder Thimmajja ◽  
Sreevani Rentala ◽  
RaveeshBevinahalli Nanjegowda ◽  
Prasanth Bevoor

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-187
Author(s):  
Karin C M Roze ◽  
Corrie Tijsseling ◽  
Bridey Rudd ◽  
Bea G Tiemens

Abstract This study was aimed at validating the Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter (I.ROC) for deaf, hard-of-hearing, and tinnitus patients in a mental health care setting. There is a need for an accessible instrument to monitor treatment effects in this population. The I.ROC measures recovery, seeing recovery as a process of experiencing a meaningful life, despite the limitations caused by illness or disability. A total of 84 adults referred to 2 specialist mental health centers for deaf, hard-of-hearing, and tinnitus adults in the Netherlands completed the Dutch version of I.ROC and 3 other instruments. A total of 25 patients refused or did not complete the instruments: 50% of patients using sign language and 18% of patients using spoken language. Participants completed the measures at intake and then every 3 months. In this sample I.ROC demonstrated good internal consistency and convergent validity. Sensitivity to change was good, especially over a period of 6 or 9 months. This study provides preliminary evidence that the I.ROC is a valid instrument measuring recovery for hard-of-hearing and tinnitus patients using spoken language. For deaf patients using sign language, specifically those with limited language skills in spoken and written Dutch, more research is needed.


1977 ◽  
Author(s):  
James H. Johnson ◽  
Thomas A. Williams ◽  
Ronald A. Giannetti ◽  
L. J. Schmidt

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sreevani Rentala ◽  
Sunanda Govinder Thimmajja ◽  
Prashant Bevoor ◽  
Raveesh Bevinahalli Nanjegowda

Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of short-term in-service education program in improving nurse’s knowledge, attitude and self-reported practices related to physical restraint use. Methods. A quasi-experimental one group pre-post study was conducted involving nurses working at a tertiary mental health care setting, Dharwad, India. We provided 3 consecutive days of intensive restraint management education (total 6 hours-two hours per day) with a follow-up assessment after one month. The standard questionnaires on knowledge, attitude and practice regarding physical restraints were used as tools for measuring the impact of in-service education program. The program was conducted for a group of five to six nurses at a time. Teaching was done using lecture method, group discussion and demonstrations. Results. Of the 52 nurses who participated in the study, 52% were male, 58.5% had a baccalaureate degree. The mean age of respondents was 33.3 years, the mean work experience was 6.7 years. The findings of the study revealed that the mean scores on the knowledge regarding physical restraints increased after the in-service education from 6.4 to 8.2 (p<0.001). The mean attitude scores improved from 18.5 to 23.1 (p<0.001). There was a significant difference in mean practice scores between pre and post-intervention phases (23.7 versus 25.4; p<0.001). There was a significant correlation between post-test knowledge, attitude and practice scores. Conclusion. The in-service education program improved nurse’s knowledge, attitude and self-reported practice scores. This may lead to more effective restraints management by psychiatric nurses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document