scholarly journals The Value of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in the Diagnosis of Birth Defects: Insights from a Large Multicentre Study in Southern China

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meiying Cai ◽  
Na Lin ◽  
Xuemei Chen ◽  
Ying Li ◽  
Min Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multicentre Study ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Southern China ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Copy Number Variations ◽  
Trisomy 13 ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Large Multicentre Study

Abstract Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a fast, safe, and non-disruptive diagnostic method. At present, few studies have evaluated the screening efficiency of NIPT positive predictive value (PPV) in study subjects. Here, the results of NIPT in pregnant women were retrospectively analysed, and the detection rate, PPV and follow-up data were evaluated to determine its clinical value. A large multicentre study was conducted involving 52,855 pregnant women who received NIPT. Based on gestational age, amniotic fluid or umbilical cord blood were extracted for simultaneous karyotype and chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) in NIPT-positive patients. Among the 52,855 cases, 754 were NIPT-positive, with a positivity rate of 1.4%. Karyotype analysis and/or CMA confirmed 323 cases of chromosomal abnormalities, with a PPV of 45.1%. PPV of Trisomy 21 (T21), Trisomy 18 (T18), Trisomy 13 (T13), sex chromosomal aneuploidies (SCA) and copy number variations (CNV) were 78.9%, 35.3%, 22.2%, 36.9% and 32.9%, respectively. The PPV of T21, T18, and T13 increased with age whereas, the PPV of SCA and CNVs had little correlation with age. The PPV was significantly high in patients with advanced age along with an abnormal ultrasound.NIPT had a high PPV for T21, and a low PPV for T13 and T18, while screening for SCA and CNVs showed clinical significance. However, in case of NIPT screening for SCA and CNVs, simultaneous karyotype and CMA should be performed to increase the detection rates. Interventional prenatal diagnosis is still required in NIPT-positive cases to avoid false positives or unnecessary termination of pregnancy.

scholarly journals Prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal abnormalities among 2318 pregnant women with indications in southern China: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Gu ◽  
Sudong Liu ◽  
Huaxian Wang ◽  
Ruiqiang Weng ◽  
Xuemin Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cord Blood ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Southern China ◽  
Chorionic Villus ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Copy Number Variations ◽  
Chromosomal Anomalies ◽  
Chromosomal Polymorphisms

Abstract Background To investigate the frequency of fetal chromosomal abnormalities among women with abnormal ultrasound, abnormal biochemical marker screening or noninvasive prenatal testing results, advanced maternal age, or history of miscarriage in southern China. Methods We retrospectively analyzed prenatal samples from pregnant women between 2015 and 2019. Conventional karyotyping was performed using GTG banding. Copy number variation sequencing was used when indicated to identify chromosomal abnormalities. Results A total of 2,318 prenatal samples (188 chorionic villus samples, 2,003 amniotic fluids, and 127 cord blood) were analyzed. The frequency of chromosomal abnormalities was 12.4% (288/2,318) in prenatal samples, and frequency in chorionic villus samples (23.9%) was higher than in amniotic fluids (13.5%) and in cord blood (5.0%; P < 0.001). Numerical anomalies were detected in 195 (8.4%) cases and the most common abnormality were trisomy 21 (103/2,318; 4.4%), trisomy 18 (31/2,318; 1.3%) and monosomy X (18/2,318; 0.8%). Sructural anomalies were found in 29 (1.3%) cases, rare anomalies such as deletions (4 cases), duplications (2 cases), and complex rearrangement (1 case), were detected. Two cases with common chromosomal polymorphisms, inv(9)(p11q12) and inv(9)(p11q13), associated with recurrent spontaneous abortion, were detected. Five fetuses had normal karyotypes and definite pathogenic copy number variations, with microdeletions at 16p13.11, 16p12.1 (2 cases), and 17p12 and a microduplication at 7q11.23; all had normal phenotypes after birth. Conclusion Our study indicated that fetal chromosomal anomalies can be detected in early gestation and provided valuable information for interpretation of chromosomal polymorphisms and copy number variations.

scholarly journals Expanded noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy and copy number variations and parental willingness for invasive diagnosis in a cohort of 18,516 cases

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunsheng Ge ◽  
Jia Li ◽  
Jianlong Zhuang ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Yanru Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Copy Number Variations ◽  
Trisomy 13 ◽  
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Parental Willingness

Abstract Background Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been wildly used to screen for common aneuplodies. In recent years, the test has been expanded to detect rare autosomal aneuploidies (RATs) and copy number variations (CNVs). This study was performed to investigate the performance of expanded noninvasive prenatal testing (expanded NIPT) in screening for common trisomies, sex chromosomal aneuploidies (SCAs), rare autosomal aneuploidies (RATs), and copy number variations (CNVs) and parental willingness for invasive prenatal diagnosis in a Chinese prenatal diagnosis center. Methods A total of 24,702 pregnant women were retrospectively analyzed at the Women and Children’s Hospital from January 2013 to April 2019, among which expanded NIPT had been successfully conducted in 24,702 pregnant women. The high-risk expanded NIPT results were validated by karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis. All the tested pregnant women were followed up for pregnancy outcomes. Results Of the 24,702 cases, successful follow-up was conducted in 98.77% (401/446) of cases with common trisomies and SCAs, 91.95% (80/87) of RAT and CNV cases, and 76.25% (18,429/24,169) of cases with low-risk screening results. The sensitivity of expanded NIPT was 100% (95% confidence interval[CI], 97.38–100%), 96.67%(95%CI, 82.78–99.92%), and 100%(95%CI, 66.37–100.00%), and the specificity was 99.92%(95%CI, 99.87–99.96%), 99.96%(95%CI, 99.91–99.98%), and 99.88% (95%CI, 99.82–99.93%) for the detection of trisomies 21, 18, and 13, respectively. Expanded NIPT detected 45,X, 47,XXX, 47,XXY, XYY syndrome, RATs, and CNVs with positive predictive values of 25.49%, 75%, 94.12%, 76.19%, 6.45%, and 50%, respectively. The women carrying fetuses with Trisomy 21/Trisomy 18/Trisomy 13 underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis and terminated their pregnancies at higher rates than those at high risk for SCAs, RATs, and CNVs. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that the expanded NIPT detects fetal trisomies 21, 18, and 13 with high sensitivity and specificity. The accuracy of detecting SCAs, RATs, and CNVs is still relatively poor and needs to be improved. With a high-risk expanded NIPT result, the women at high risk for common trisomies are more likely to undergo invasive prenatal diagnosis procedures and terminate their pregnancies than those with unusual chromosome abnormalities.

scholarly journals Noninvasive prenatal testing for chromosome aneuploidies and subchromosomal microdeletions/microduplications in a cohort of 42,910 single pregnancies with different clinical features

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yibo Chen ◽  
Qi Yu ◽  
Xiongying Mao ◽  
Wei Lei ◽  
Miaonan He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Features ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Maternal Plasma ◽  
Trisomy 13 ◽  
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Cell Free Fetal Dna ◽  
Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies

Abstract Background Since the discovery of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal plasma, it has opened up new approaches for non-invasive prenatal testing. With the development of whole-genome sequencing, small subchromosomal deletions and duplications could be found by NIPT. This study is to review the efficacy of NIPT as a screening test for aneuploidies and CNVs in 42,910 single pregnancies. Methods A total of 42,910 single pregnancies with different clinical features were recruited. The cell-free fetal DNA was directly sequenced. Each of the chromosome aneuploidies and the subchromosomal microdeletions/microduplications of PPV were analyzed. Results A total of 534 pregnancies (1.24%) were abnormal results detected by NIPT, and 403 pregnancies had underwent prenatal diagnosis. The positive predictive value (PPV) for trisomy 21(T21), trisomy 18 (T18), trisomy 13 (T13), sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs), and other chromosome aneuploidy was 79.23%, 54.84%, 13.79%, 33.04%, and 9.38% respectively. The PPV for CNVs was 28.99%. The PPV for CNVs ≤ 5 Mb is 20.83%, for within 5–10 Mb 50.00%, for > 10 Mb 27.27% respectively. PPVs of NIPT according to pregnancies characteristics are also different. Conclusion Our data have potential significance in demonstrating the usefulness of NIPT profiling not only for common whole chromosome aneuploidies but also for CNVs. However, this newest method is still in its infancy for CNVs. There is still a need for clinical validation studies with accurate detection rates and false positive rates in clinical practice.

scholarly journals The Clinical Application of Non-invasive Prenatal Genetic Testing in the Screening of Fetal Chromosomal Diseases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Pang ◽  
chaohong wang ◽  
Junxiang Tang ◽  
Jiansheng Zhu
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Clinical Application ◽  
Trisomy 21 ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Reference Value ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Trisomy 13 ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Chromosome Aneuploidy

Abstract Objective：To explore the efficacy and clinical application value of non-invasive prenatal testing (non-invasive prenatal testing, NIPT) for screening fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Methods: NIPT was performed on 25,517 pregnant women. The high-risk samples were compared with amniotic fluid and cord blood chromosome karyotype analysis. Some samples were further verified by microarray (CMA), and pregnancy outcomes were followed up. Results: Of all the cases examined, 25502 cases were detected successfully, and a total of 294 high-risk samples (1.15%) were detected, of which further diagnosis was made in 208 cases, true positive samples were detected in 96 cases, and further tests were refused in 86 cases.71 cases (0.28%) of autosomal aneuploid high-risk samples were detected and 51 cases were diagnosed, including 44 cases of trisomy 21 (T21), 5 cases of trisomy 18 (T18), and 2 cases of trisomy 13 (T13). The PPV was 90.90%, 45.45% and 33.33%, respectively. Thirteen high-risk samples of trisomy 21, 18, and 13 were detected, and 1 case was confirmed as T21 mosaic PPV was 8.33% NPV was 100%. High-risk samples of sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) were detected in 72 cases (0.28%), 23 cases were diagnosed, and the PPV was 40.07%. The PPV was 12.00%, 50.00%, 72.73% and 75.00%, respectively, and the PPV was 12.00%, 50.00%, 72.73% and 75.00%, respectively. High-risk samples of copy number variation (CNV) were detected in 104 cases (0.41%), and 18 cases were diagnosed, with a PPV of 32.14%. Other high-risk samples of chromosome aneuploidy were detected in 34 cases (0.13%), and 3 cases were diagnosed as T2, T9, and T16, respectively. PPV is 8.70%.Conclusion: NIPT is suitable for trisomy 21, 18, and 13 screening, especially for T21. It also has a certain reference value for SCA and microdeletion and microduplication syndromes（MMS）, and it is not recommended for screening for other chromosomal aneuploidies.

scholarly journals Positive predictive value (PPV) of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for chromosomal abnormalities in pregnant women candidates for invasive methods

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 61-53
Author(s):  
Elham Kazemi Jahromi ◽  
Ensieh Salehi ◽  
Shole Namazi ◽  
Mahsa Mohammadi Maram ◽  
Maryam Azizi Kutenaee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Women Candidates ◽  
Non Invasive

OP77 Nudging In Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Ethical Guidance

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (S1) ◽  
pp. 19-19
Author(s):  
Michal Stanak
Keyword(s):  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Universal Coverage ◽  
Trisomy 13 ◽  
Ethical Challenges ◽  
Hand Search ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Accountability For Reasonableness ◽  
Ethical Guidance ◽  
Normative Issues

IntroductionNon-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) has already established itself in many European countries (either via public or private institutions) as an option at hand that pregnant women can choose. Based on mother's blood, NIPT claims to “quasi-diagnose” among other things the presence of chromosomal abnormalities caused by an aneuploidy of a chromosome (such as Trisomy 13, 18, and 21). Apart from normative issues concerning the question of “whether to fund NIPT by universal coverage”, NIPT gives rise also to normative issues concerning the question of “how to put NIPT into practice” – the analysis of which is the goal of this study.MethodsComplemented by a hand search, we have conducted a systematic literature search in Ovid MEDLINE and PsycINFO for combinations of NIPT and nudging, NIPT and participation, and NIPT and ethics. Screening was based on content analysis of titles, abstracts, and articles. Writing of the study is in progress.ResultsWe identified 83 references of which 39 were included. The main instance of nudging (or also of unintentional choice design) was the use of default bias (the application or reduction of friction cost/hassle factor) that influenced the turnout to NIPT. In establishing NIPT in universal coverage systems, further potential biases identified were the use of authority bias, bandwagon effect, sunk-cost bias, and framing effect. The core ethical challenges with nudging in NIPT derive from the lack of transparency of the methods applied and the challenge of paternalism.ConclusionsAlong the line of accountability for reasonableness, four specific recommendations are suggested as the ethical guidance to using of the tool of nudging in NIPT: (i) decision makers should recognize that some choice design is inevitable, (ii) nudging should be done transparently, (iii) rationales for nudging should be publicly accessible. (iv) revision procedures should be put in place.

scholarly journals Prenatal diagnosis of 2193 pregnant women with invasive indications for chromosomal abnormalities in southern China: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Gu ◽  
Sudong Liu ◽  
Huaxian Wang ◽  
Ruiqiang Weng ◽  
Xuemin Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Genetic Screening ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Chromosome Abnormalities ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Non Invasive

Abstract Background: Although a variety of non-invasive techniques are used for prenatal genetic screening and diagnosis, our knowledge remains limited regarding the relationship between high-risk prenatal indications and fetal chromosomal abnormalities.Methods: We retrospectively investigated the prenatal genetic screening and karyotype analysis results of pregnant women who had undergone invasive prenatal testing in Prenatal Diagnosis Department of Meizhou People’s Hospital during Jan. 1, 2015 to Dec. 31, 2019. We analyzed the frequencies of chromosome abnormalities in women with high-risk indications.Results: A total of 2,193 pregnant women who had underwent invasive prenatal testing were included in our analysis. Chromosomal abnormalities occurred in 10.3% of these women, and rate increased with maternal age (P < 0.001). The frequencies of chromosome abnormalities varied for women with different high-risk indications, which was 10.3% (226/2193) for abnormal ultrasound results, 3.3% (31/938) for positive serum screening test results, 61.4% (78/127) for positive NIPT results, 9.3% (13/140) for AMA and 11.1% (10/90) for obstetric/family history. Follow up data showed that 380 pregnant women opted for termination the pregnancy, including 211 (55.5%) due to karyotype abnormalities and 169 (45.5%) due to abnormal ultrasonic outcomes.Conclusion: Our data suggested that the prenatal screening methods have high false positive rates. NIPT is the most accurate non-invasive prenatal screening. Apart from karyotype abnormality, abnormal ultrasound results alone accounted for a big part of pregnancy termination.

scholarly journals Performance of Cell-Free DNA Screening for Fetal Common Aneuploidies and Sex Chromosomal Abnormalities: A Prospective Study from a Less Developed Autonomous Region in Mainland China

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 478
Author(s):  
Yunli Lai ◽  
Xiaofan Zhu ◽  
Sheng He ◽  
Zirui Dong ◽  
Yanqing Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Read Depth ◽  
Trisomy 13 ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Aneuploidy Screening ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Risk Result

To evaluate the performance of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) in the detection of common aneuploidies in a population-based study, a total of 86,262 single pregnancies referred for NIPS were prospectively recruited. Among 86,193 pregnancies with reportable results, follow-up was successfully conducted in 1160 fetuses reported with a high-risk result by NIPS and 82,511 cases (95.7%) with a low-risk result. The screen-positive rate (SPR) of common aneuploidies and sex chromosome abnormalities (SCAs) provided by NIPS were 0.7% (586/83,671) and 0.6% (505/83,671), respectively. The positive predictive values (PPVs) for Trisomy 21, Trisomy 18, Trisomy 13 and SCAs were calculated as 89.7%, 84.0%, 52.6% and 38.0%, respectively. In addition, less rare chromosomal abnormalities, including copy number variants (CNVs), were detected, compared with those reported by NIPS with higher read-depth. Among these rare abnormalities, only 23.2% (13/56) were confirmed by prenatal diagnosis. In total, four common trisomy cases were found to be false negative, resulting in a rate of 0.48/10,000 (4/83,671). In summary, this study conducted in an underdeveloped region with limited support for the new technology development and lack of cost-effective prenatal testing demonstrates the importance of implementing routine aneuploidy screening in the public sector for providing early detection and precise prognostic information.

PP350 Study On The Awareness, Willingness To Pay And Satisfaction With Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Among Pregnant Women

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (S1) ◽  
pp. 30-30
Author(s):  
Changjia Fan ◽  
Wenru Shang ◽  
Jiayan Huang ◽  
Yang Wan
Keyword(s):  
Willingness To Pay ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Birth Defects ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Down's Syndrome ◽  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Down’S Syndrome ◽  
Anhui Province ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Non Invasive

IntroductionBirth defects seriously affect children's survival and quality of life and bring great suffering and financial burden to children and their families. Down's syndrome is one of the most common birth defects. Compared with traditional serological screening methods, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has higher sensitivity and specificity in the screening of Down's syndrome. In April 2017, the People's Government of Fuyang City, Anhui Province launched a NIPT free screening program. From the perspective of the beneficiary, this research investigated the awareness, willingness to pay and satisfaction of pregnant women in Fuyang City, Anhui Province, to better improve the use of NIPT.MethodsA questionnaire survey was conducted on 1,221 pregnant women who experienced this program in Fuyang City, Anhui Province. Multivariate ordered logistic regression models were established to analyze the factors affecting the satisfaction of NIPT.ResultsA total of 1,217 valid questionnaires were collected. Research indicated 82.5 percent knew about NIPT and 81.9 percent were willing to pay personally when its price was CNY 800 (USD 113.88) per test among pregnant women. The satisfaction of pregnant women with NIPT showed that the waiting time for test results was relatively low (4.5 out of 5 points) compared with other aspects of satisfaction. The higher the education level of the pregnant women, the lower their satisfaction with NIPT.ConclusionsIt is necessary to pay attention to the characteristics of education and to improve the awareness and satisfaction of NIPT among pregnant women. Meanwhile, if it is affordable enough for NIPT services to be provided by the government, this mode should be promoted. In conjunction with the willingness to pay of pregnant women, NIPT payment methods should be developed appropriately.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document