scholarly journals Impact of Femoral Stem Prosthesis Tip On Femoral Cortex After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)

Author(s):  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Qiang Wang ◽  
Qi Cheng ◽  
Dasai Wang ◽  
Jian Cheng ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The mechanisms of pain after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not clear, which may be related to its impact on the femoral cortex caused by improper prosthesis placement. This study was to explore the the impact of the femoral stem prosthesis on the femoral cortex after implantation, and its relationship with postoperative thigh pain. Methods: Totally 172 patients who underwent primary THA were retrospectively analyzed, who were divided into the impact (n=25) and non-impact (n=147) groups. Contact or penetration of the femoral stem prosthesis tip with the distal femoral cortex was defined as impingement. Patients were followed up and recorded.Results: In the patients undergoing primary THA, 25 patients (14.5%) had impact, including 7 males and 18 females. Most of the patients in the impact group were women of small stature. In the impact group, the postoperative thigh pain was more obvious, and the Harris Hip score (HHS) was lower, compared with the non-impact group (P < 0.05). The regression analysis showed that height (OR=1.196; 95%CI: 1.059-1.351; P=0.004) and prosthesis implant angle (PIA) (OR=0.208; 95%CI: 0.074-0.584; P=0.003) were important risk factors for distal femoral cortical impingement in patients who underwent THA. Conclusions: Patients with short stature should have adequate preoperative planning for primary THA, to prevent increased risk of postoperative thigh pain due to impinging femoral stem implants.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhijie Chen ◽  
Bin Li ◽  
Kaizhe Chen ◽  
Jianmin Feng ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Short tapered stem placement has been extensively employed in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Suboptimal fixation tends to cause postoperative complications, such as thigh pain. However, it remains unclear whether poor seating/alignment of short tapered stems contributes to thigh pain. In this study, we retrospectively examined the factors that might be associated with the thigh pain. Methods Medical records of 230 patients who had undergone THAs at our hospital were reviewed retrospectively. All patients received the same mediolateral (ML) short tapered femoral stems. The association between thigh pain and patients’ demographics, radiographic findings, or the type of fitting of the femoral stems was investigated.Results In our cohort, 68 patients (27.8%) presented with thigh pain. Among 203 type I fit patients, 62 (30.5%) developed thigh pain, while only 6 out of 43 (12.2%) type II fit patients had thigh pain, with the differences being statistically significant (x2=6.706, p=0.01). In addition, hip anteroposterior radiographs exhibited that the stem angulation (mean 2.52°), variation in angulation (mean 1.32°), and the extent of femoral stem subsidence (mean 0.29cm) were greater in patients with thigh pain than in their counterparts without thigh pain (all p<0.05). Conclusion Malalignment and improper seating of short tapered stems could be at least one of the reasons for post-THA thigh pain. The distal contact between the stem tip and medial femoral cortex might result in thigh pain. Our study suggested that distal implant contact should be avoided, and stem alignment should be meticulously performed in the placement of ML short tapered femoral stems for THA.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhijie Chen ◽  
Bin Li ◽  
Kaizhe Chen ◽  
Jianmin Feng ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Short tapered stem placement has been extensively employed in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Suboptimal fixation tends to cause postoperative complications, such as thigh pain. However, it remains unclear whether poor seating/alignment of short tapered stems contributes to thigh pain. In this study, we retrospectively examined the factors that might be associated with thigh pain. Methods Medical records of 230 patients who had undergone THAs at our hospital were reviewed retrospectively. All patients received the same mediolateral (ML) short tapered femoral stems. The association between thigh pain and patients’ demographics, radiographic findings, or the type of fitting of the femoral stems was investigated. Results In our cohort, 68 patients (27.8%) presented with thigh pain. Among 203 type I fit patients, 62 (30.5%) developed thigh pain, while only 6 out of 43 (12.2%) type II fit patients had thigh pain, with the differences being statistically significant (x2 = 6.706, p = 0.01). In addition, hip anteroposterior radiographs exhibited that the stem angulation (mean 2.52°), the variation in angulation (mean 1.32°), and the extent of femoral stem subsidence (mean 0.29 cm) were greater in patients with thigh pain than in their counterparts without thigh pain (all p < 0.05). Conclusion Malalignment and improper seating of short tapered stems could be at least one of the reasons for post-THA thigh pain. The distal contact between the stem tip and the medial femoral cortex might result in thigh pain. Our study suggested that distal implant contact should be avoided, and stem alignment should be meticulously performed in the placement of ML short tapered femoral stems for THA.


Author(s):  
Anatole Vilhelm Wiik ◽  
Adeel Aqil ◽  
Bilal Al-Obaidi ◽  
Mads Brevadt ◽  
Justin Peter Cobb

Abstract Aim The length of the femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a practical consideration to prevent gait impairment. The aim of this study was to determine if reducing the femoral stem length in THA would lead to impaired gait biomechanics. Methods Patients uniformly with the same brand implant of differing lengths (100 mm vs 140–166 mm) were taken retrospectively from a prospective trial introducing a new short stem. Twelve patients without any other disorder to alter gait besides contralateral differing length stem THA were tested at differing gradients and speed on a validated instrumented treadmill measuring ground reaction forces. An anthropometrically similar group of healthy controls were analysed to compare. Results With the same posterior surgical approach, the offset and length of both hips were reconstructed within 5 mm of each other with an identical mean head size of 36 mm. The short stem was the last procedure for all the hips with gait analysis occurring at a mean of 31 and 79 months postoperatively for the short and long stem THA, respectively. Gait analysis between limbs of both stem lengths demonstrated no statistical difference during any walking condition. In the 90 gait assessments with three loading variables, the short stem was the favoured side 51% of the time compared 49% for the long stem. Conclusion By testing a range of practical walking activities, no lower limb loading differences can be observed by reducing the femoral stem length. A shorter stem demonstrates equivalence in preference during gait when compared to a reputable conventional stem in total hip arthroplasty.


Author(s):  
Hiranya Kumar Seenappa ◽  
Karthik Mittemari Naraynamurthy ◽  
Rasiq Rashid ◽  
Shivraj Nadagouda ◽  
Vamshhikrishna Chand

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background: </strong>Study aimed to assess and compare the functional outcome in patients underwent the large femoral head THA and conventional femoral head THA.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> It is a comparative prospective cross sectional study conducted among the patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty through postero-lateral approach at department of orthopaedics Vydehi institute of medical sciences, Bengaluru during the period of July 2017 to July 2019. Patients aged between 18-80years of both genders undergoing Primary THA for Osteoarthritis (OA), Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS), Post traumatic arthritis, Avascular necrosis (AVN), Acute fracture neck of femur, Non-union fracture neck of femur (NOF). Patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty in Intertrochanteric fracture, Acetabular fracture and patients undergoing Revision Hip Arthroplasty were excluded from study. Patients were grouped as the ones treated with large femoral head THA and conventional femoral head THA.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results: </strong>This series consisted of 36 patients with 44 diseased hips treated with primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Out of 36 patients, 9 patients (25%) belonged to an age group of below 30 years of age, 10 patients (27.8%) belonged to the age group between 31-40 years of age, 8 patients (22.2%) belonged to the age group 41-51 years of age and 9 patients (25%) belonged to age group of 51-60 years of age. The mean level of Modified Harris Hip score and improvement of movements in all planes was found to be statistically significantly in the patients treated with large femoral head primary THA compared to those treated with conventional method. (p&lt;0.001)</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study has shown improved functional outcome (Modified harris hip score) and range of movement in the patients treated with the large femoral head primary THA as compared to those treated with a conventional femoral head.</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lim Chia Hua ◽  
V.A. Jacob ◽  
N. Premchandran

The present concepts in Total Hip Arthroplasty advocate mechanical cement interlock with trabecular bone utilising the third-generation cementing technique. However, the force generated can easily reach peak pressure of 122 kPa to 1500 kPa, leading to extrusion of cement through nutrient foramina into femoral cortex into nutrient vessels, henceforth the retrograde arteriovenogram. A 76 years old lady who premorbid ADLindependent had a fall and sustained a closed right neck of femur fracture. She underwent cemented right total hip arthroplasty. Acetabulum cup of 47mm and femoral stem size 1 was utilized. Femoral canal was prepared and medullary cavity plug inserted before retrograde cement was introduced using the cementing gun. Intraoperative no complications were noted. This case has been followed up to a year with no adverse effect. The post-operative radiograph demonstrated a linear radio-opacity communicating with the posterior aspect of the femoral shaft which continues proximally and medially for approximately 10cm. Its uniformity in shape and position corresponds to the vascular supply of proximal femur. In Farouk et al cadaveric study, nutrient vessel arises in 166 ± 10 mm from the greater trochanter and is a branch of the second perforating artery from the deep femoral artery. Knight et al infer that retrograde cement extrusion occurs in female patients with small stature and small endosteal canal. Cement extrusion unlikely will influence the long haul survival of prosthesis as shown in the radiograph that cement is well pressurized to interlock with the endosteal bone. Moreover, because of extensive anastomoses of perforating branches of the deep femoral artery, segmental obliteration of nutrient artery alone is unlikely to lead to vascularity issues. Cement extrusion into the nutrient foramen is a vital differential in presence of posterior medial cement in the diaphysis of the femur following total hip replacement. This is to differentiate from extra osseous extrusions due to the iatrogenic breach of the femoral cortex suggesting periprosthetic fracture which affects the long term survival of prosthesis.


2019 ◽  
pp. 112070001987738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duncan W Cushnie ◽  
Brent A Lanting ◽  
Richard McCalden ◽  
Douglas DR Naudie ◽  
James L Howard

Introduction: Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) implants may be combined with a conventional femoral stem to create a modular metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (BHR MoM THA). There is little outcome data regarding this construct. This study examines midterm outcomes of BHR MoM THA compared to oxidised zirconium total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: A retrospective institutional review identified all patients receiving BHR MoM THA between April 2005 and February 2011 and a matched control cohort of zirconium THA patients. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and SF-12 Health status scores were obtained. Revisions and complications were collected from clinical records. Radiographs were assessed for evidence of component malposition, loosening, osteolysis, or heterotopic ossification. Results: 63 modular BHR MoM THA were identified in 61 patients (36 with BHR cups, 27 with R3 cups) and 63 zirconium THA in 58 matched controls. Mean follow-up was 58 months. 14 BHR MoM THA hips (22.2%) were revised (4 infections, 1 dislocation, 9 soft tissue reactions) compared to 3 (4.8%) zirconium THA (all infections). At latest follow-up, 18.4% of surviving BHR MoM THA hips were painful compared to 0.5% of zirconium THA controls ( p < 0.001). WOMAC, HHS, and SF-12 did not differ significantly between surviving members of the 2 groups. Discussion: BHR MoM THA demonstrated a high revision rate, largely for adverse local soft tissue reaction and pain. Among those not revised, many reported some residual pain despite similar quality of life measures to those who received zirconium THA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document