scholarly journals Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Polytrauma: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaela Ritschel ◽  
Silke Kuske ◽  
Irmela Gnass ◽  
Silke Andrich ◽  
Kai Moschinski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Participation ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Postal Survey ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Abstract Background: Tools assessing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after polytrauma have not been systematically reviewed so far. Therefore, we sought to: (1) collect instruments that assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL), activities of daily living (ADL), and social participation during follow-up after polytrauma, (2) describe their use (e.g. frequency of application during follow-up), and (3) investigate other relevant PROs assessed in the included studies (e.g. pain, depression, anxiety).Methods: The search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, the trials registers ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP. All original empirical research published between January 2005 and April 2018 was included. Data extraction, narrative content analysis, and a critical appraisal were performed.Results: The search yielded 3496 hits and 54 publications were included in the review. Predominantly, HRQoL was assessed (in 48 of 54 publications), with Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) applied most frequently. ADL and (social) participation were rarely assessed. The follow-up period lasted between 8 days and 17.5 years; assessments were performed between one and five times. Most used were a single assessment of PROs, a follow-up period of 1 to 1.5 years, and a postal survey. Other relevant PRO areas reported were function, mental disorders, and pain.Conclusions: There is a large variation in the assessment of PROs after polytrauma, impairing comparability of outcomes. First efforts to standardise the collection of PROs have been initiated, but further harmonisation between central players, such as trauma registers, is required. Definition and continuous collection of core outcome sets would improve comparability of study results, creating the basis for more targeted treatment. Additional knowledge on rarely reported PRO areas like (social) participation and social network may lead to their consideration in health services provision.Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42017060825)

scholarly journals Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma – instruments and methods: a systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e050168
Author(s):  
Michaela Ritschel ◽  
Silke Kuske ◽  
Irmela Gnass ◽  
Silke Andrich ◽  
Kai Moschinski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Social Participation ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Patient Reported

ObjectivesWe (1) collected instruments that assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL), activities of daily living (ADL) and social participation during follow-up after polytrauma, (2) described their use and (3) investigated other relevant patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessed in the studies.DesignSystematic Review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guideline.Data sourcesMEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, as well as the trials registers ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP were searched from January 2005 to April 2018.Eligibility criteriaAll original empirical research published in English or German including PROs of patients aged 18–75 years with an Injury Severity Score≥16 and/or an Abbreviated Injury Scale≥3. Studies with defined injuries or diseases (e.g. low-energy injuries) and some text types (e.g. grey literature and books) were excluded. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were excluded, but references screened for appropriate studies.Data extraction and synthesisData extraction, narrative content analysis and a critical appraisal (e.g. UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) were performed by two reviewers independently.ResultsThe search yielded 3496 hits; 54 publications were included. Predominantly, HRQoL was assessed, with Short Form-36 Health Survey applied most frequently. ADL and (social) participation were rarely assessed. The methods most used were postal surveys and single assessments of PROs, with a follow-up period of one to one and a half years. Other relevant PRO areas reported were function, mental disorders and pain.ConclusionsThere is a large variation in the assessment of PROs after polytrauma, impairing comparability of outcomes. First efforts to standardise the collection of PROs have been initiated, but require further harmonisation between central players. Additional knowledge on rarely reported PRO areas (e.g. (social) participation, social networks) may lead to their consideration in health services provision.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017060825.

Moving from a ‘One Size Fits All’ to Personalized Follow-Up in Breast Cancer Survivors—Connecting Patient-Reported Outcomes with Economic Considerations

2019 ◽  
pp. 307-316
Author(s):  
Carmen Dirksen ◽  
Merel Kimman ◽  
Manuela Joore ◽  
Liesbeth Boersma
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Process Of Care ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Economic Considerations

Abstract: In the Netherlands, two studies were performed to investigate the effectiveness of several alternative follow-up strategies in terms of patient-reported outcomes (health-related quality of life and satisfaction), and to address economic considerations in breast cancer follow-up care. This chapter describes the economic evaluation of four follow-up strategies after breast cancer treatment. As such, it provides an example of the application of economic methods to evaluate the relative value of breast cancer care. Whereas economic evaluation is outcome-focused, the process of care delivery is also a major determinant of patient value. Insight into patients’ preferences for outcome and process is crucial in order to tailor care to individual patients’ needs. Therefore, in a second study, patients’ preferences for the process of care delivery were evaluated.

Association of Physical Morbidity and Health-Related Quality of Life in a Representative Sample of Older German People

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 140-151
Author(s):  
Markus A. Wirtz ◽  
Matthias Morfeld ◽  
Elmar Brähler ◽  
Andreas Hinz ◽  
Heide Glaesmer
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Representative Sample ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
German Population ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Abstract. The association between health-related quality of life (HRQoL; Short-Form Health Survey-12; SF-12) and patient-reported morbidity-related symptoms measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15) is analyzed in a representative sample of older people in the general German population. Data from 1,659 people aged 60 to 85 years were obtained. Latent class analysis identified six classes of patients, which optimally categorize clusters of physical symptoms the participants reported: musculoskeletal impairments (39.8%), healthy (25.7%), musculoskeletal and respiratory/cardiac impairments (12.8%), musculoskeletal and respiratory impairments, along with bowel and digestion problems (12.9%), general impairments (4.9%), and general impairments with no bowel and digestion problems (4.8%). The participants’ SF-12 Physical Health Scores (η2 = .39) and their Mental Health Scores (η2 = .28) are highly associated with these latent classes. These associations remain virtually identical after controlling for age. The results provide evidence that profiles of patient-reported physical impairments correspond strongly with reduced HRQoL independently from aging processes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document