scholarly journals Determination of Spinal Anesthesia Induced Hypotension in Cesarean Section

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-73
Author(s):  
Sanjay Kumar Gupta ◽  
◽  
Saurabh Singhal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-129
Author(s):  
Yasser Essam Elfeil ◽  
Ahmed Mohammed Alattar ◽  
Tamer Ahmed Ghoneim ◽  
Aliaa Rabie Abd Elaziz ◽  
Ehsan Akram Deghidy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tikuneh Yetneberk ◽  
Yophetah W. Berhe ◽  
Habtamu Getnet ◽  
Mamaru Mollalign

Abstract Background Spinal anesthesia-induced maternal hypotension is the most frequent complication associated with maternal morbidity and mortality during cesarean section. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence and magnitude of hemodynamic changes in preeclamptic and non-preeclamptic parturients undergone cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Method A prospective cohort study was conducted from February to May 2019 in University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital. A total of 122 ASA II and ASA III parturients were recruited consecutively and assigned to two groups (81non-preeclamptics, and 41 preeclamptics). The data analysis was done by SPSS version 22 statistical software. The data were tested for normality with Shapiro Wilk U-test and normally distributed data were compared by using the independent student’s t-test. Whereas non-normally distributed data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U- test. Fisher’s exact test was used for intergroup comparison of proportion. All P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Result The incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension was higher in non-preeclamptic parturients than preeclamptic parturients (55.6% vs. 34.1%, respectively) and the degree of blood pressure drop was significantly greater in the non-preeclamptic parturients compared to those with preeclampsia; As well intraoperative fluid consumption was significantly greater in the non-preeclamptics parturients compared to those with preeclamptics. Conclusion The incidence and magnitude of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in parturients undergone cesarean section were less in preeclamptic parturients than in non-preeclamptic parturients. Therefore, don’t deny spinal anesthesia for preeclamptic parturients due to fear of profound hypotension, unless there is a contraindication for spinal anesthesia.


Author(s):  
S. Hiruthick ◽  
K. V. L. Sanjana

Background and Aims: During Cesarean section, hypotension occurs in the most of parturients, following spinal anesthesia. This prospective observational study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of two different Bolus Doses of Phenylephrine for Prevention of Spinal-Induced Hypotension during Cesarean Section. Materials and Methods: A total of 120 parturients undergoing cesarean section were divided into two groups of group A and group B with sixty in each group. Group A received phenylephrine 75 mcg IV bolus, while Group B received phenylephrine 100 mcg IV bolus, immediately after giving spinal anesthesia. For the next 20 minutes, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DSP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) were recorded every 2 minutes, and APGAR scores at 1 and 5 minutes were recorded. Results: There was no difference between the two groups in terms of preventing hypotension, with 16.6% in Group A and 16.6% in Group B. In the first 2–6 minutes, however, the rise in systolic pressure in Group B was higher than in Group A. Group B (46.66 %) had a higher rate of bradycardia than Group A (25 %). Conclusion: Both phenylephrine dosages were equally effective in preventing hypotension following spinal anesthesia. However, Prophylactic bolus dose of phenylephrine 75 mcg was found to be effective for the management of spinal-induced hypotension and should be preferred over 100 mcg which causes significant bradycardia and reactive hypertension.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document