scholarly journals The Clinicopathologic Evaluation of Eosinophilic Cholecystitis: A Retrospective Observational Study in a Tertiary Care Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. A142-146
Author(s):  
Senay Erdogan-Durmus ◽  
Hilal Balta ◽  
Sevilay Ozmen ◽  
Ilknur Calik ◽  
Yusuf Can ◽  
...  

Background: Eosinophilic cholecystitis (EC) is a rare form of cholecystitis that is diagnosed histopathologically. The aim of this study to evaluate the patient demographic features, laboratory findings and histopathologic characteristics of EC. The aim of this study to evaluate the patient demographic features, laboratory findings and histopathologic characteristics of EC. Design and setting: Retrospective observational study conducted in Erzurum, Turkey. Methods: Between June 2014 and June 2017 3,178 cholecystectomy specimens were reviewed retrospectively. Nineteen EC cases were included to the study. Parameters such as sex, age, clinical information, laboratory findings were obtained from information system of hospital. And the data of EC group were compared with a control group of 50 non-specific chronic cholecystitis patients (CC). Result: Out of 3,178 cholecystectomy specimens, 19 cases were diagnosed as EC (0.59%). Patients’ age ranged from 22-84 years and female to male ratio was 1.7:1. The average eosinophil count was 139.7 U/L in EC group. 11.7% of EC group had high level for eosinophils. In the EC group there were statistical significances between high eosinophil percentages and aspartate transaminase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) values (P<0.05, P<0.05). The EC group eosinophil levels were slightly higher than CC. Histopathologically, dense, severe infiltrates composed of eosinophils were seen. Conclusion: EC is a rare entity that can only diagnosed by histopathology.  There were certain high levels in liver function tests and eosinophils in correlation with non-specific cholecystitis. Although the presentation may be similar to non-specific cholecystitis, if a postoperative histopathological diagnosis of EC is made, then the patient must be investigated thoroughly to rule out other associated disease conditions. 

Mycoses ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Aguilar‐Company ◽  
María Teresa Martín ◽  
Lidia Goterris‐Bonet ◽  
Alex Martinez‐Marti ◽  
Júlia Sampol ◽  
...  

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raja Sundaramurthy ◽  
Suryakumar Balasubramanian ◽  
Vithiya Ganesan ◽  
Pearl Aggarwal ◽  
Tarun Parvataneni ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Neena Bhalodiya ◽  
Kerul J. Prajapati ◽  
Parth Hingol ◽  
Simple Bhadania

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The study aimed to assess the profile of various pathological conditions that present with nasal mass in Indian patients.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This is a retrospective observational study of 43 patients of sinonasal masses who visited GMERS Medical College and Hospital, Sola, Ahmedabad, India during May 2017 to March 2020. The clinical profile of sinus or nasal masses were observed along with their radiological features on computed tomography scans of paranasal sinuses. The age and gender sub group were also assessed for distribution of these conditions. Most of the patients were managed with surgical techniques.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Overall, clinical profile of 43 patients was observed. The clinicopathological examination aided by endoscopic and imaging studies revealed that 20 (46.5%) patients presented with the non-neoplastic masses and remaining were with neoplastic masses (53.5%). The overall M: F ratio was 1.5:1. Most of the patients belong to         11-30 years age group. The most common symptoms were mass in the nasal cavity and nasal discharge. Polyps were most common lesions seen (25.6%). Surgical intervention in the form of biopsy, excision of mass, functional endoscopic sinus surgery was performed in all patients.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> This study gives an insight into various lesions presenting as sinonasal masses and their clinical and pathological profile. Overall, surgical management in form of excision by endoscopic or external approach is effective modality of treatment supplemented with appropriate medical management.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. S15-S16
Author(s):  
Sneha Waghela ◽  
Darshan Hegde ◽  
Arpita Gupta ◽  
Prakruthi Kaushik ◽  
Neena Phade ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
SunilValentine Furtado ◽  
Rakshith Srinivasa ◽  
KirthanaUbrangala Kunikullaya ◽  
Sangeeta Biradar ◽  
Dravya Jayakumar ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document