Hybrid Vigor and Combining Ability in a High‐Low Yielding, Eight‐Parent Diallel Cross of Soft Red Winter Wheat 1

Crop Science ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1126-1129 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Bitzer ◽  
F. L. Patterson ◽  
W. E. Nyquist
1971 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Bitzer ◽  
F. L. Patterson ◽  
W. E. Nyquist

Six soft winter wheat lines were crossed in a diallel fashion and data were obtained from the parents and F1 hybrid generation over two years. The mean squares for year by genotype interaction were significant for most measured characters indicating that the genotypes responded somewhat differently each year. The yield response of the F1 generation hybrids ranged from −0.7 to 28.1% with 13 of 15 F1 hybrids above the higher parent; however, none was significantly higher.Combining ability analyses were performed on the F1 hybrids, and mean squares for general combining ability were significant for earliness, plant height, and kernels per spike. No significant mean squares for specific combining ability were detected. Monon was the best general combiner for both number of spikes and yield, and Gaines was a good general combiner for kernels per spike. The Jinks and Hayman (Vr, Wr) graphic analysis indicated that plant height, kernel weight, and number of spikes were controlled by some partial dominance and yield by apparent overdominance.


Crop Science ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 871-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen W. Kirlies ◽  
Thomas L. Housley ◽  
Abdallah M. Emam ◽  
Fred L. Patterson ◽  
Martin R. Okos

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Clayton R. Bailey ◽  
Lathan B. Daniels ◽  
Wayne K. Coblentz ◽  
Elizabeth B. Kegley ◽  
Levi J. McBeth ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mohamed Mergoum ◽  
Jerry W. Johnson ◽  
James W. Buck ◽  
Steve Sutton ◽  
Benjamin Lopez ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Paul ◽  
M. P. McMullen ◽  
D. E. Hershman ◽  
L. V. Madden

Multivariate random-effects meta-analyses were conducted on 12 years of data from 14 U.S. states to determine the mean yield and test-weight responses of wheat to treatment with propiconazole, prothioconazole, tebuconazole, metconazole, and prothioconazole+tebuconazole. All fungicides led to a significant increase in mean yield and test weight relative to the check (D; P < 0.001). Metconazole resulted in the highest overall yield increase, with a D of 450 kg/ha, followed by prothioconazole+tebuconazole (444.5 kg/ha), prothioconazole (419.1 kg/ha), tebuconazole (272.6 kg/ha), and propiconazole (199.6 kg/ha). Metconazole, prothioconazole+tebuconazole, and prothioconazole also resulted in the highest increases in test weight, with D values of 17.4 to 19.4 kg/m3, respectively. On a relative scale, the best three fungicides resulted in an overall 13.8 to 15.0% increase in yield but only a 2.5 to 2.8% increase in test weight. Except for prothioconazole+tebuconazole, wheat type significantly affected the yield response to treatment; depending on the fungicide, D was 110.0 to 163.7 kg/ha higher in spring than in soft-red winter wheat. Fusarium head blight (FHB) disease index (field or plot-level severity) in the untreated check plots, a measure of the risk of disease development in a study, had a significant effect on the yield response to treatment, in that D increased with increasing FHB index. The probability was estimated that fungicide treatment in a randomly selected study will result in a positive yield increase (p+) and increases of at least 250 and 500 kg/ha (p250 and p500, respectively). For the three most effective fungicide treatments (metconazole, prothioconazole+tebuconazole, and prothioconazole) at the higher selected FHB index, p+ was very large (e.g., ≥0.99 for both wheat types) but p500 was considerably lower (e.g., 0.78 to 0.92 for spring and 0.54 to 0.68 for soft-red winter wheat); at the lower FHB index, p500 for the same three fungicides was 0.34 to 0.36 for spring and only 0.09 to 0.23 for soft-red winter wheat.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-112
Author(s):  
Amir M. H. Ibrahim ◽  
Russell Sutton ◽  
Jerry W. Johnson ◽  
Mohamed Mergoum ◽  
Bryan Simoneaux ◽  
...  

Crop Science ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 844-847 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. L. McKendry ◽  
D. N. Tague ◽  
K. E. Miskin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document