Response of Potted Slash Pine Seedlings on Imperfectly Drained Coastal Plain Soil to Additions of Zinc

1976 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 586-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. H. McKee
Keyword(s):  
Coastal Plain ◽  
Slash Pine ◽  
Pine Seedlings ◽  
Coastal Plain Soil

Influence of wheel traffic and tillage on microbial biomass, residue decomposition and extractable nutrients in a Coastal Plain Soil

1996 ◽  
Vol 180 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Entry ◽  
D. Wayne Reeves ◽  
Carole B. Backman ◽  
Randy L. Raper
Keyword(s):  
Microbial Biomass ◽  
Coastal Plain ◽  
Residue Decomposition ◽  
Extractable Nutrients ◽  
Coastal Plain Soil

The Growth response of slash pine (Pinus elliottii) to climate in the Georgia Coastal Plain

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen C. Parker ◽  
Carrie Jensen ◽  
Albert J. Parker
Keyword(s):  
Coastal Plain ◽  
Growth Response ◽  
Pinus Elliottii ◽  
Slash Pine

Effects of Cover Crops on Pore-Size Distribution in a Coastal Plain Soil

1947 ◽  
Vol 11 (C) ◽  
pp. 43-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Lutz ◽  
W. L. Nelson ◽  
N. C. Brady ◽  
C. E. Scarsbrook
Keyword(s):  
Pore Size Distribution ◽  
Pore Size ◽  
Size Distribution ◽  
Coastal Plain ◽  
Cover Crops ◽  
Coastal Plain Soil

Reduction of Root Competition Increases Growth of Slash Pine Seedlings on a Cutover Site in Florida

1992 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 193-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis E. Putz
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Period ◽  
Pinus Elliottii ◽  
Slash Pine ◽  
Root Competition ◽  
Canopy Openness ◽  
Apparent Effect ◽  
Nitrogen And Phosphorus ◽  
Woody Vines ◽  
Pine Seedlings ◽  
Aboveground Growth

Abstract Slash pine (Pinus elliottii var. elliottii Engelm.) seedlings (1-0) planted in a cutover stand dominated by 6-year-old coppiced hardwoods and woody vines benefited from reduction in root competition (by trenching) but not from increased light (by guy-wiring back overtopping trees).Over the 2-year experimental period there was no apparent effect of increasing canopy openness from 10% to 30% on pine seedling height, diameter, or aboveground biomass. In contrast, trenching resulted in increased foliar nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations, higher soil moisture contents,and a twofold increase in aboveground growth. The results support the use of site preparation and planting techniques that reduce root competition suffered by pine seedlings. South. J. Appl. For. 16(4):193-197

Simulation of Corn Yield by a Water Management Model for a Coastal Plain Soil in Virginia

1988 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 0734-0742 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. C. McMahon ◽  
S. Mostaghimi ◽  
F. S. Wright
Keyword(s):  
Water Management ◽  
Coastal Plain ◽  
Management Model ◽  
Corn Yield ◽  
Coastal Plain Soil

Nursery Fertilization and Top Pruning of Slash Pine Seedlings

1990 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary L. Duryea
Keyword(s):  
Crop Yield ◽  
Field Performance ◽  
Growing Season ◽  
Height Growth ◽  
Slash Pine ◽  
Shoot Height ◽  
Foliar Nitrogen ◽  
N Concentration ◽  
Pine Seedlings

Abstract Top pruning, growing-season fertilization, and fall fertilization were investigated in a Florida nursery to determine the effects on crop yield, morphology, nutrition, and field performance. Top pruning improved crop yield by reducing the number of cull seedlings. Top-pruned seedlings were smaller in diameter, height, and weight and had an increased number of multiple tops. In the field, top-pruned seedlings had the same survival and height growth, and after 3 years the percentage with multiple tops was the same as nonpruned seedlings. From these results, top pruning seems to be a nondetrimental practice for controlling height and producing a uniform crop in the nursery. Reducing growing-season fertilization slightly decreased shoot height, but not as much as top pruning. Also, these seedlings had reduced foliar nitrogen (N) concentration and content and grew less after 1 year in the field indicating that cutting back on N in the nursery may not be a beneficial way to control height. Fall fertilization in the nursery increased N in seedlings but did not affect growth or survival in the field. South. J. Appl. For. 14(2):73-76.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document