scholarly journals Early‐Time GPR: A Method to Monitor Spatial Variations in Soil Water Content during Irrigation in Clay Soils

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Algeo ◽  
Remke L. Van Dam ◽  
Lee Slater
Soil Research ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 233 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Foley ◽  
E. Harris

Past studies have shown that soil-specific calibrations are required to attain a higher level of accuracy when measuring soil water content with ThetaProbe and ECHO probe soil water sensors, particularly in swelling clay soils. Both probes were assessed for their capacity to accurately monitor soil water in a deep drainage study on a Black Vertosol. Probes were trialled in situ and calibrated against hand-sampled volumetric measurements. The generic calibrations given by the manufacturers resulted in significant errors in water content estimates for both probes. Using the generic calibration, ECHO probes under-estimated water content by 0.10–0.2 m3/m3, whereas ThetaProbes under-estimated by 0.04 m3/m3 at the wet end and over-estimated by 0.08 m3/m3 at the dry end. The soil-specific calibrations significantly improved the accuracy of both probes. ThetaProbes were chosen for the drainage study. The calibration allowed for accuracy across the full wet–dry range to within 0.001–0.004 m3/m3 of volumetric measurements. ECHO probes were less accurate at the wet end, but still determined soil water content to within 0.02–0.05 m3/m3 of volumetric measurements.


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. vzj2012.0202 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Ferrara ◽  
P.M. Barone ◽  
C. M. Steelman ◽  
E. Pettinelli ◽  
A.L. Endres

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remke L. Van Dam* ◽  
Jonathan Algeo ◽  
Lee D. Slater ◽  
Andrew M. Binley ◽  
Christopher W. Watts

Soil Research ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 825 ◽  
Author(s):  
BJ Bridge ◽  
J Sabburg ◽  
KO Habash ◽  
JAR Ball ◽  
NH Hancock

The dielectric behaviour of 3 soils, a sandy loam (Red Chromosol), a highly structured non-swelling clay (Red Ferrosol), and a self-mulching swelling clay (Black Vertosol), was investigated using a waveguide and network analyser technique in the frequency range 3.0 GHz to 4.5 GHz. Curves relating the real part of the relative permittivity to water content are presented and compared with the general Topp curve. The Chromosol generally followed the Topp curve, but the Ferrosol and Vertosol both had curves below the Topp curve. The Ferrosol showed a maximum horizontal offset of 0.05 m3/m3 from the Topp curve in the mid soil-water content range of 0.2–0.3 m3/m3 offset from the Topp curve of 0.10 m3/m3, with a maximum of 0.12 m3/m3 occurring at a soil water content of 0.4 m3/m3. Similar dielectric curves were obtained for the Chromosol and Vertosol using time domain reflectometry (TDR). With this method, the Chromosol showed very close agreement with the Topp curve, but the Vertosol again gave a curve below the Topp curve, similar to the one obtained using the waveguide and network analyser, but with a smaller maximum horizontal offset of 0.08 m3/m3. The difference between the waveguide and TDR Vertosol curves was mainly attributed to low bulk densities in the waveguide where packing was difficult. Some was also attributed to the wider spectrum of frequencies used by TDR. Use of the Topp curve for TDR measurements in the Vertosol would underestimate its water content by at least 0.06 m3/m3. These results are in good agreement with others obtained from similar soils. Deviations from the Topp curve are attributed to bound water associated with the clay particles and this depends on clay mineralogy and clay content. The presented calibration curves improve the accuracy of TDR measurements in these types of clay soils. A field comparison between water contents measured by TDR and gravimetric sampling in a similar Black Vertosol is presented. This calibration showed that soil water contents can be severely overestimated by using TDR with long probes and cables. This unexpected and opposite result is discussed in terms of attenuated high frequencies in the 15-m-long connecting cable used, errors in depth of probe placement, and changes in bulk density and DC conductivity.


1988 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 715-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. KACHANOSKI ◽  
I. J. VAN WESENBEECK ◽  
E. G. GREGORICH

The relationships among the spatial variations of soil water content, soil texture, soil solution electrical conductivity, and bulk soil electrical conductivity were examined for a field characterized by net drainage and low concentrations of dissolved electrolytes. Bulk soil electrical conductivity was measured over various depths at 52 locations within a 1.8-ha field using noncontacting electromagnetic inductive meters. Soil water content (0–0.5 m depth) was measured at the same locations using the time domain reflectometry method. Measurements of soil texture and soil solution conductivity were obtained from core samples from 37 of the sampling locations. Soil water content at the site ranged from 0.06 to 0.36 m3 m−3. Clay content ranged from 2.5 to 44% percent and bulk soil electrical conductivity ranged from 0.0 to 0.21 S m−1. Significant correlation existed among almost all of the measured variables. Regression analysis indicated soil solution conductivity had no effect on measured bulk soil electrical conductivity for soil water contents less than 0.25 m3 m−3. Bulk soil electrical conductivity explained 96% of the spatial variation of soil water content independent of a wide range of soil texture. Autocorrelations of soil water content were similar to autocorrelations for bulk soil electrical conductivity. Under conditions similar to those in the study area, it should be possible to infer spatial variations in soil water content quickly by measuring bulk electrical conductivity using noncontacting electromagnetic inductive meters. Key words: Spatial variability, soil water, electrical conductivity, soil texture


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 180001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Algeo ◽  
Lee Slater ◽  
Andrew Binley ◽  
Remke L. Van Dam ◽  
Chris Watts

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document