Running for the Exit: Community Cohesion and Bank Panics

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrich R. Greve ◽  
Ji-Yub (Jay) Kim

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (1) ◽  
pp. 11220
Author(s):  
Henrich R. Greve ◽  
Ji-Yub Jay Kim


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 204-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrich R. Greve ◽  
Ji-Yub (Jay) Kim


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra I. Sienkiewicz ◽  
Jacqueline S. Mattis ◽  
Katherine Kirkinis ◽  
Ian A. Gutierrez


2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juha-Pekka Niinimmki






2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Ilott

This article uses readings of Mark Mylod’s Ali G Indahouse, Joe Cornish’s Attack the Block, and Chris Morris’s Four Lions to argue against a political trend for laying the blame for the purported failure of British multiculturalism at the hands of individual communities. Through my readings of these comic films, I suggest that popular constructions of “community” based on assumptions about cultural and religious homogeneity are rightly challenged, and new communities are created through shared laughter. Comedy’s structural engagement with taboo means that stereotypes which have gained currency through media and political discourse that seeks to demonize particular groups of young men (Muslims and gang members, for example) are foregrounded. By being brought to the forefront and exposed, these stereotypes can be engaged with and challenged through ridicule and demonstrations of incongruity. Furthermore, I suggest that power relations are made explicit through joking structures that work to include or exclude, meaning that the comedies can draw and redraw communities of laughter in a manner that effectively challenges notions of communities as discrete, homogeneous, and closely connected to cultural heritage. The article works against constructions of British Muslims as the problem community par excellence by using multicultural discourse to contextualize the representation of British Muslims and demonstrate how the discourse has repressed the role of political, social, and economic structures in a focus on “self-segregating” communities.



2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 78-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Pilkington

It is imperative that an appropriate balance is reached between three key principles: equality, diversity and social cohesion. In many countries across the world, however, there is a discernible move away from a concern for equality and diversity as the problem of order looms larger. I shall focus here on Britain in presenting my central thesis that there is a very real danger that a new nationalist discourse centred on community cohesion and integration is trouncing any duties on us to promote racial equality and respect cultural diversity. The paper comprises three sections. I shall firstly identify a radical hour when there was for the first time official recognition that institutional racism existed in British society and some urgency that this needed to be combated. I shall secondly highlight the fragility of such progressiveness and identify threats from the changing nature of racial discourse since 2001. Here, I shall highlight in particular how the prominence given to institutional racism, with the publication of the Macpherson report, was remarkably short lived and how multiculturalism has come under increasing attack, not least because of its purported threat to social cohesion. I shall finally offer some tentative proposals for a more positive way forward.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document