Organizational Development, Organizational Culture and Organizational Change

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kung'u Kamau Gabriel
2010 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley M. Guidroz ◽  
Karen W. Luce ◽  
Daniel R. Denison

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to share with organizations a method for integrating organizational culture change and leadership development within one balanced corporate initiative.Design/methodology/approachThis paper describes the benefits of organizational culture and leadership development, the steps taken to design such a program within a large, global manufacturing organization, and the benefits of the integrated program.FindingsIntegrating organizational culture with leadership development can help create a clear “line of sight” between the individual and the organization and builds broader accountability for the success of organizational change initiatives.Practical implicationsIntegrated culture and leadership programs can be designed within any environment. This case study serves as an example to provide readers with ideas for how to create and implement similar programs in other organizations.Originality/valueKotter stresses the need for leadership in organizational change, however, few case studies have been published in this area that articulate how leadership and organizational development can be successfully integrated.


Author(s):  
Денис Борисович Литвинцев ◽  
Наталья Ивановна Нижальская

В статье рассматривается 12 принципов Beyond Budgeting, предложенные Дж. Хоупом и Р. Фрейзером, и особенности их применения к управлению многоквартирными домами. Анализируется возможность внедрения Beyond Budgeting не только в управляющих организациях, но и при непосредственном управлении многоквартирными домами и создании товариществ собственников жилья. Результаты внедрения принципов Beyond Budgeting (изменение организационной культуры) анализируются по модели McKinsey 7S. Рекомендации по внедрению Beyond Budgeting даются в рамках теории организационных изменений М. Бира и Н. Нориа. Положительный опыт внедрения принципов Beyond Budgeting в ООО УК «Маяк» позволяет рекомендовать управление за рамками бюджетирования другим организациям, осуществляющих предпринимательскую деятельность по управлению многоквартирными домами в России. The article examines the 12 principles of Beyond Budgeting , proposed by J. Hope and R. Fraser, and the peculiarities of their application to the management of multi-apartment buildings. The possibility of introducing Beyond Budgeting is analyzed not only in management organizations, but also in the direct management of apartment buildings and in creation of a homeowners' association. The results of the implementation of the principles of Beyond Budgeting (change in organizational culture) are analyzed according to the McKinsey 7S model. Recommendations for the implementation of Beyond Budgeting are given in the framework of the theory of organizational change by M. Beer and N. Noria. The positive experience of implementing principles of Beyond Budgeting at OOO Management Company ‘Mayak’ allows us to recommend Beyond Budgeting management to other organizations carrying out entrepreneurial activities in the management of apartment buildings in Russia.


Author(s):  
REGINA ANDRIUKAITIENE ◽  
A. V. CHEREP ◽  
V. H. VORONKOVA ◽  
O. P. PUNCHENKO ◽  
O. P. KYVLIUK

Author(s):  
Jay C. Thomas

Chapter 9 discusses organizational change and development, the procedures and methods intended to change the character of an organization and improve its performance, and how change efforts may be directed at selected groups, such as executive teams, certain units, locations, or the entire organization. It covers Organizational Development (OD), Process Consultation (PC), teams and team building, survey feedback and action research, externally imposed change, mergers and acquisitions, and planning and managing change.


2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 13-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darrell Norman Burrell

University business schools are facing intense criticism that their traditional MBA and other graduate management curriculum fail to teach change management skills, employee development skills, employee recruiting skills, team-building skills, and the importance of ethical behaviour. Due to increasing technology, competition, and workforce diversity, today's leadership decisions are more complex than they were five years ago. The need for today's middle managers, senior managers, vice presidents, COOs, and CEOs to have more advanced leadership education has become critical, but the traditional Ph.D. and even the Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) have not become a recognized and acceptable viable solution. In contrast to the traditional Ph.D. and DBA which is geared towards the engagement of theory and research, the advanced leadership knowledge involved in the Doctor of Management (DM) encompasses advanced leadership training that is practical and focused on leadership's complex impact on improving organizational culture and human resources development. While MBA programmes or the traditional business Ph.D. programmes are focused on finance, accounting, marketing, operations strategy, and quantitative research, DM goes a step further by also considering the importance of developing employees, organizational culture, and teams as a major aspect of strategy execution success. DM looks at management almost in an interdisciplinary way by blending leadership courses that touch on psychology, human resources management, communications, human relations, employee development, organizational behaviour, and traditional management science. While traditional business Ph.D. and DBA programmes focus on skill development in order to effectively manage organizational operations and organizational process, DM focuses on people because without a properly developed and appropriately constituted staff, success will only be limited. For many years, it was assumed that a doctorate degree was not applicable in the international business world. DM is a major departure of tradition by enabling executives to use a combination of pure leadership theory and applied research methods to define, implement, and evaluate the strategies necessary for organizational growth and survival in a 3-4 year programme without having to leave their full-time jobs. DM addresses the question: If the definition of management is getting work done through people, then why are traditional Ph.D. programmes so heavily focused on business and so little on employees and organizational development?


2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.S. Rao

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to embrace change effectively to achieve organizational development. Design/methodology/approach – The paper outlines the case studies on two turnaround leaders – Alan Mulally and Lou Gerstner. It explains various aspects of organizational change and development. It unveils a blueprint to embrace change effectively. Findings – It underscores that the only thing constant in the current global business environment is change and competition. It enlightens that change requires a new mindset, tool set and skill set. The only successful leaders are the ones who accept and mould themselves as per the changing times and technologies. Practical implications – The methodologies adopted by turnaround leaders can be applied to any type of organizational change, in any industry and any size of organization. Social implications – The social implications of this research suggests that turnaround leaders can do much better by communicating clearly to overcome resistance to lead change effectively. Originality/value – It differentiates between change and growth. It justifies the need to effect change swiftly in the present dynamic business environment. It concludes that change is inevitable to achieve organizational excellence and effectiveness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document