scholarly journals The Roles of Price Points and Menu Costs in Price Rigidity

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward S. Knotek
Keyword(s):  
2000 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A Buckle ◽  
John A Carlson
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Owen ◽  
David Trzepacz

Author(s):  
Patrick Sebastian Holzer ◽  
Thomas Bittmann

AbstractThe present study investigates the underlying factors of price stickiness in German food retailing using fluid milk as a case study. We distinguish the duration between two actual price changes and two regular price changes as measures for price stickiness. Especially in the case of private labels, the choice of proxy for price rigidity has important implications. If we consider (regular) price changes, private label products are more (less) rigid than national brands. Price rigidity increases in the product’s average price. Prices of low priced private labels are rather flexible. Price adjustment of high priced private labels is similarly sluggish compared to national brands. We rationalize this finding with variable mark-ups under imperfect competition. In line with previous research, we find that price stickiness also depends on product attributes, retail formats, menu costs, psychological price points, and time-varying market conditions.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-45
Author(s):  
Erwan Gautier ◽  
Hervé Le Bihan

Sectoral heterogeneity matters for monetary policy. Using CPI microdata, we estimate for 227 products a time–varying menu-cost model to investigate the quantitative relevance of this heterogeneity. We find a substantial degree of cross-sectoral heterogeneity in all structural parameters. Heterogeneity in the Calvo component of the pricing friction is however the main source of heterogeneity in price rigidity. Cross-sectoral heterogeneity amplifies the output effect of a monetary shock by a factor of about 2.5, compared to a single-sector model estimated with mean moments. Heterogeneity in the Calvo parameter plays a key role in this amplification.


2009 ◽  
pp. 54-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Shastitko ◽  
S. Avdasheva ◽  
S. Golovanova

The analysis of competition policy under economic crisis is motivated by the fact that competition is a key factor for the level of productivity. The latter, in its turn, influences the scope and length of economic recession. In many Russian markets buyers' gains decline because of the weakness of competition, since suppliers are reluctant to cut prices in spite of the decreasing demand. Data on prices in Russia and abroad in the second half of 2008 show asymmetric price rigidity. At least two questions are important under economic crisis: the 'division of labor' between pro-active and protective tools of competition policy and the impact of anti-crisis policy on competition. Protective competition policy is insufficient in transition economy, especially in the days of crisis it should be supplemented with the well-designed industrial policy measures which do not contradict the goals of competition. The preferable tools of anti-crisis policy are also those that do not restrain competition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document