Teaching the Bloomberg Financial Information System Using Online Videos: An Action Research Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Godfrey
Author(s):  
Göran Goldkuhl ◽  
Par J. Agerfalk

There are many attempts to explain success and failure in information systems. Many of these refer to a purported socio-technical gap. In this paper we develop an alternative approach that does not impose such a strong dichotomy, but regards social and technical rather as dimensions along which to study workpractices. The developed theory involves not only the “social” and “technical” constructs but also other generic ones, namely “instrumental”, “semiotic” and “pragmatic”. We call this theory socio-instrumental pragmatism. To illustrate the theoretical concepts introduced, we use an example brought from an extensive action research study including the development of an information system in eldercare, developed through a participatory design approach.


2009 ◽  
pp. 2341-2354
Author(s):  
Göran Goldkuhl ◽  
Pär J. Ågerfalk

There are many attempts to explain success and failure in information systems. Many of these refer to a purported sociotechnical gap. In this article we develop an alternative approach that does not impose such a strong dichotomy, but regards social and technical rather as dimensions along which to study workpractices. The developed theory involves not only the “social” and “technical” constructs, but also other generic ones, namely “instrumental,” “semiotic,” and “pragmatic.” We call this theory socio-instrumental pragmatism. To illustrate the theoretical concepts introduced, we use an example brought from an extensive action research study including the development of an information system in eldercare, developed through a participatory design approach.


2008 ◽  
pp. 2252-2264
Author(s):  
G. Goldkuhl ◽  
P. J. Agerfalk

There are many attempts to explain success and failure in information systems. Many of these refer to a purported sociotechnical gap. In this article we develop an alternative approach that does not impose such a strong dichotomy, but regards social and technical rather as dimensions along which to study workpractices. The developed theory involves not only the “social” and “technical” constructs, but also other generic ones, namely “instrumental,” “semiotic,” and “pragmatic.” We call this theory socio-instrumental pragmatism. To illustrate the theoretical concepts introduced, we use an example brought from an extensive action research study including the development of an information system in eldercare, developed through a participatory design approach.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (CSCW1) ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Nolte ◽  
Linda Bailey Hayden ◽  
James D. Herbsleb

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document