scholarly journals Pricing Initial Public Offerings in Premature Capital Markets: The Case of Hungary

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibolya Schindele ◽  
Enrico C. Perotti
Author(s):  
Merritt B Fox

This chapter begins by considering the especially severe information-asymmetry problem that plagues primary offerings of truly new securities. It then examines market-based solutions for these problems, the shortcomings of exclusive reliance on such solutions, and the rationale for having a government-designed affirmative-disclosure regime, whereby an issuer making an offering is required to answer certain questions. It also addresses the question of whether this regime should be imposed on all issuers making such offerings or only those that volunteer to be subjected to it. The remainder of the chapter considers the rationale for mandating the imposition of liability on issuers, issuer directors and officers, underwriters, dealers, and experts such as accountants or rating agencies when there have been material misstatements or material omissions of what was required to be disclosed. The final section briefly applies the preceding discussion to the efforts, as part of the Capital Markets Union, to increase the opportunities for European SMEs raise funds through public offerings.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendrik Wessling

For a long time, markets for listed stocks and listed stock derivatives have been regarded as immune to competition restrictions or distortions. This dissertation disproves this generally accepted theory and shows that numerous anticompetitive practices can and do occur in this segment of financial markets. Its comprehensive analysis includes market cornering, agreements that restrict supply in initial public offerings and instances of coordinated market manipulation. It considers the latest empirical findings relating to capital markets and, since it refers to the point at which antitrust law and capital markets law overlap, also examines the relationship between both legal fields. Using the example of coordinated market manipulation, the author ultimately analyses sanctions and damage claims arising from parallel violations of antitrust law and capital markets law.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 132-143
Author(s):  
Gonca Atici ◽  
Guner Gursoy

The purpose of this study is to analyze trends of non-financial corporations listed on Borsa Istanbul (BIST) in terms of ownership structure for the period of 2002-2019. According to our findings, Turkish non-financial corporations reveal a concentrated nature as an example of family capitalism. Findings also reveal that initial public offerings are mainly from family-controlled corporations. This is noteworthy as corporations integrate more to the capital markets of Turkey. Besides, they get more disciplined as they subject to the regulations of the governing bodies and internalise corporate governance criteria. In terms of ownership mix, findings denote that non-financial corporations listed on BIST benefit from the advantages of conglomerates, cross-ownership, and foreign ownership in line with the literature. Contrary to several emerging economies, state-ownership has a minor share which renders strength and quality of governance level. The concentrated nature of corporations is believed to have a positive effect on governance mechanisms for controlling agency problems especially in the environment of uncertainty during COVID-19. Although Turkish capital markets have promising and progressing corporate governance mechanisms, steps to build up advanced digital governance mechanisms for the “digital new normal” should be taken as soon as possible.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document