On the Limited Policy Relevance of Evolutionary Explanations

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cass R. Sunstein
2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Malhotra

AbstractAlthough Boyer & Petersen's (B&P's) cataloguing of and evolutionary explanations for folk-economic beliefs is important and valuable, the authors fail to connect their theories to existing explanations for why people do not think like economists. For instance, people often have moral intuitions akin to principles of fairness and justice that conflict with utilitarian approaches to resource allocation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 336-341
Author(s):  
Ivana Hromatko ◽  
Josip Hrgović

Evolution ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eevi Savola ◽  
Clara Montgomery ◽  
Fergal M. Waldron ◽  
Katy M. Monteith ◽  
Pedro Vale ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Boin ◽  
Mirjana Rupar ◽  
Sylvie Graf ◽  
Sybille Neji ◽  
Olivia Spiegler ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 1983 (20) ◽  
pp. 107-112
Author(s):  
Francis X. Sutton
Keyword(s):  

Health Policy ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry P.A. van de Water ◽  
Rom J.M. Perenboom ◽  
Hendriek C. Boshuizen

Cephalalgia ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 624-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Loder

Susceptibility to migraine is determined by genetic factors and is therefore subject to the forces of natural selection. Migraine is a common and ancient disorder whose prevalence may be increasing, suggesting that a migraine-prone nervous system may be associated with reproductive or survival advantages. Five evolutionary explanations are reviewed that might account for the persistence of migraine: (i) migraine as a defence mechanism; (ii) migraine as a result of conflict with other organisms; (iii) migraine as result of novel environmental factors; (iv) migraine as a trade-off between genetic harms and benefits; and (v) migraine as a design constraint. An evolutionary perspective on migraine allows the generation of important hypotheses about the disorder and suggests rewarding possibilities for further research.


2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 549-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
MWANGI S. KIMENYI

Abstract:In recent years, there have been major advances in the empirical analysis of the link between institutions and development. However, a number of methodological problems – both theoretical and empirical – remain unresolved and have been well articulated by Ha-Joon Chang in his article ‘Institutions and Economic Development: Theory, Policy and History’. These problems raise valid concerns about the policy relevance of the evidence arising from the studies. A more reliable approach to study the link between institutions and development and overcome the inherent problems of cross-country empirical analysis is to direct focus to microeconomic analysis of institutions. Such an approach avoids ideologically driven normative judgments about the superiority of particular institutional arrangements and also offers a more credible and tractable avenue to investigate institutional change.


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 357-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Martin ◽  
P. Sunley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document