Are Administrative Pay Systems a Veil? Evidence from Within-firm Data

Author(s):  
Michael Gibbs ◽  
Wallace E. Hendricks
Keyword(s):  
2002 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-11
Author(s):  
William B. Abernathy
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Mark Bussin

This study was conducted in 2012 and replicates Bussin and Huysamen’s (2004) work, conducted in 2003, on remuneration policies. It investigates the factors driving remuneration policy in South Africa and determines whether these factors have changed since 2003. Anonymous e-mail questionnaires were received from 131 senior company representatives. All participating companies were members of the South African Reward Association (SARA) or clients of a large remuneration consulting firm. Data were analysed using a chi-squared test and factor analysis. Results support Bussin and Huysamen’s study, which found that the two main drivers of change in policy were the retention of talented staff and the financial results of the organisation. However, three components of remuneration are receiving greater prominence than they did in 2003: governance in the organisation, merit pay and retention strategies. These findings suggest a greater shareholder expectation that pay should be linked to performance, and that pay acts as a retention strategy for critical staff.


Author(s):  
Mohamed Jellal ◽  
Christophe J. Nordman ◽  
Francois-Charles Wolff

1992 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-96
Author(s):  
Robert A. Wood ◽  
Thomas H. Mcinish ◽  
Kenneth D. Lawrence
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Joachim Wagner

SummaryThis paper contributes to the literature on the use of anonymized firm level data by reporting results from a replication study. To test for the practical usefulness of anonymized data I selected two of my published papers based on different cross sections of firm data. The data used there were anonymized by micro aggregation. I replicated the analyses reported in the papers with the anonymized data, and then compared the results to those produced with the original data. Frequently, the reported levels of statistical significance differ. Furthermore, statistically significant coefficients sometimes differ by order of magnitude. Therefore, at least for the moderate sample sizes used here micro-aggregated firm data should not be considered as a tool for empirical research.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
Omar Belkhodja

By relying on an extensive set of firm data for foreign affiliates in China, the paper investigates the determinants of FDI location choice for multinational firm subsidiaries located in different special economic and investment zones. Using a logit estimation, the results suggest that various factors explain the location choice of FDI in China, and vary according to the country of origin and the sector of activity. Overall, the results show that the protection of intellectual rights, the agglomeration economies, the investments in education and the GDP of the region affect the location choice of FDI. Implications can be drawn for policy-makers to divert FDI from coastal to inland regions. Finally, the last part of the paper derives, from the obtained results, implications for future research and theory building.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document