Self-employment, pay systems, and the theory of the firm: An empirical analysis

1998 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Garen
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 3-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
HÉCTOR SALGADO-BANDA

This study examines the impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth by using a new variable based on patent data to proxy for productive entrepreneurship. Data on self-employment is used as an alternative proxy. The study considers 22 OECD countries and finds a positive relationship between the proposed measure of productive entrepreneurship — degree of innovativeness of different nations — and economic growth, while the alternative measure, based on self-employment, appears to be negatively correlated with economic growth. A battery of econometric specifications and techniques backs the findings.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oksana Rikovska

The article examines the socio-demographic characteristics of the rural population in the context of identifying factors of fight against rural poverty. Based on empirical analysis is proven that the increase of the educational level of rural population is the most effective method for fighting rural poverty. This factor has a positive impact not only directly but also indirectly through the increase of social adaptability, self-confidence, increase of productive self employment, etc.


2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-248
Author(s):  
Vladislav Valentinov ◽  
Jana Fritzsch

This paper develops an economic rationalization of the ‘shift from government to governance’ by employing the logic of the property rights theory of the firm. Rural governance is defined as being based on the equal assignment of property rights and is hypothesized as being preferred by rural stakeholders in those cases where the stakeholders' interests are significantly common. This theoretical argument has been confirmed by an empirical analysis of rural governance in Ukraine through a survey of members of various rural cooperatives in the Kiev region.


1990 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerrit De Wit ◽  
Frans A.A.M. Van Winden

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 688-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gema Álvarez ◽  
Ana I. Sinde-Cantorna

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to test whether the usual positive effect of self-employment on job satisfaction remains once the greater autonomy and flexibility afforded by self-employment have been factored in, as well as the existence of differences in unobserved characteristics across individuals. Design/methodology/approach – It may be thought that the probability of being self-employed and the declared job satisfaction are not independent from each other due to differences in unobserved characteristics – as psychological or personality traits – across individuals. Therefore, self-employment should be treated as an endogenous variable when it is introduced as an explanatory variable in a job satisfaction equation. Given this, the paper proposes the estimation of a treatment effect model in which self-employment and job satisfaction equations are estimated jointly. Findings – The results suggest that the usual positive effect of self-employment on job satisfaction is due to the greater work autonomy afforded by self-employment, and not to the greater willingness of the self-employed to report higher levels of satisfaction. Thus, the paper finds that once flexibility and autonomy are considered, the usual positive effect of self-employment on job satisfaction disappears and becomes negative. Research limitations/implications – It would be useful further empirical analysis using other data, especially panel data, to test the robustness of the results. Originality/value – The paper proposes an alternative way to analyse the relation between self-employment and job satisfaction by taking into account both the greater autonomy and flexibility afforded by self-employment, as well as psychological or personality traits.


Legal Studies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 579-597
Author(s):  
Marc T Moore

AbstractGig work and other flexible labour practices have been subject to unprecedented levels of attention recently. While this topic has attracted significant interest from employment lawyers, it remains relatively underexplored from other pertinent legal and inter-disciplinary angles. This paper will adopt an alternative perspective on flexible work inspired by Coase's theory of the firm. Focusing on the implications of flexible work for the relative allocation of control, risk and reward within the firm, it will highlight how both task-oriented (gig) and on-demand (casual) work practices typically entail workers assuming most of the positional disadvantages associated with orthodox employment and self-employment, while enjoying none or few of the corresponding advantages. Using a hypothetical contract analysis, it will highlight the structural similarity between flexible work and unsecured financial investments in business firms by reference to key strands of institutional economics and law and finance literature. On this basis, it will enquire as to optimal forms of compensation that rational flexible workers can (counter-factually) be regarded as bargaining for in the absence of impediments to efficient contracting, and as the price for trading off their traditional employment guarantees.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document