Effects of clinical decision support on venous thromboembolism risk assessment, prophylaxis, and prevention at a university teaching hospital

2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (15) ◽  
pp. 1265-1273 ◽  
Author(s):  
William L. Galanter ◽  
Mathew Thambi ◽  
Holly Rosencranz ◽  
Bobby Shah ◽  
Suzanne Falck ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Tessa Jaspers ◽  
Marjolijn Duisenberg-van Essenberg ◽  
Barbara Maat ◽  
Marc Durian ◽  
Roy van den Berg ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground Venous thromboembolism is a potentially fatal complication of hospitalisation, affecting approximately 3% of non-surgical patients. Administration of low molecular weight heparins to the appropriate patients adequately decreases venous thromboembolism incidence, but guideline adherence is notoriously low. Objective To determine the effect of a multifaceted intervention on thromboprophylaxis guideline adherence. The secondary objective was to study the effect on guideline adherence specifically in patients with a high venous thromboembolism risk. As an exploratory objective, we determined how many venous thromboembolisms may be prevented. Setting A Dutch general teaching hospital. Method A prospective study with a pre- and post-intervention measurement was conducted. A multifaceted intervention, consisting of Clinical Decision Support software, a mobile phone application, monitoring of duplicate anticoagulants and training, was implemented. Guideline adherence was assessed by calculating the Padua prediction and Improve bleeding score for each patient. The number of preventable venous thromboembolisms was calculated using the incidences of venous thromboembolism in patients with and without adequate thromboprophylaxis and extrapolated to the annual number of admitted patients. Main outcome measure Adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines in pre- and post-intervention measurements. Results 170 patients were included: 85 in both control and intervention group. The intervention significantly increased guideline adherence from 49.4 to 82.4% (OR 4.78; 95%CI 2.37–9.63). Guideline adherence in the patient group with a high venous thromboembolism risk also increased significantly from 54.5 to 84.3% (OR 2.46; 95%CI 1.31–4.62), resulting in the potential prevention of ± 261 venous thromboembolisms per year. Conclusions Our multifaceted intervention significantly increased thromboprophylaxis guideline adherence.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Galila F. Zaher ◽  
Soheir S. Adam

Venous thromboembolism is a serious but potentially preventable condition. However, morbidity and mortality occur due to lack of thrombo-prophylaxis. Obstetrics and gynecology patients are at risk for developing venous thromboembolism. To improve adherence to thromboprophylaxis in this patient population, we developed a smart phone clinical decision support system designed to assess risk score and recommend thromboprophylaxis. Clinical data were collected by review of electronic medical charts. The risk score and thromboprophylaxis recommendations were calculated for each patient by clinical decision support system and by an expert hematologist and results were compared for correlation. We hypothesize that the system is a valid tool for risk assessment in obstetrics and gynecology patients. A total of 188 female patients admitted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital between December 2015 and March 2016 were included. One hundred and sixteen were gynecology, and 72 were obstetric patients with a mean age of 40.7 (± 12.8). The risk score obtained by the system showed a strong correlation with that of the expert hematologist’s opinion (r = 83%). The clinical decision support system showed a good correlation for thromboprophylaxis decision as well. Accessibility and ease of use of clinical decision support system can improve the clinical outcome of hospitalized patients.


Author(s):  
Alisha P. Chaudhry ◽  
Sujith Samudrala ◽  
Francisco Lopez-Jimenez ◽  
Jane L. Shellum ◽  
Rick A. Nishimura ◽  
...  

JAMA ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 283 (21) ◽  
pp. 2816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Durieux ◽  
Rémy Nizard ◽  
Philippe Ravaud ◽  
Nicolas Mounier ◽  
Eric Lepage

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document