scholarly journals Maximal Entanglement in High Energy Physics

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alba Cervera-Lierta ◽  
José Latorre ◽  
Juan Rojo ◽  
Luca Rottoli

We analyze how maximal entanglement is generated at the fundamental level in QED by studying correlations between helicity states in tree-level scattering processes at high energy. We demonstrate that two mechanisms for the generation of maximal entanglement are at work: i)ss-channel processes where the virtual photon carries equal overlaps of the helicities of the final state particles, and ii) the indistinguishable superposition between tt- and uu-channels. We then study whether requiring maximal entanglement constrains the coupling structure of QED and the weak interactions. In the case of photon-electron interactions unconstrained by gauge symmetry, we show how this requirement allows to reproduce QED. For ZZ-mediated weak scattering, the maximal entanglement principle leads to non-trivial predictions for the value of the weak mixing angle \theta_WθW. Our results are a first step towards understanding the connections between maximal entanglement and the fundamental symmetries of high-energy physics.

Author(s):  
Manuel Alejandro Segura ◽  
Julian Salamanca ◽  
Edwin Munevar

Specialized documentation envisioned from a pedagogical bases to train scientifically and technologically teachers and researchers, who initiate themselves in the analysis of high energy physics (HEP) experiments, is scarce. The lack of this material makes that young scientists' learning process be prolonged in time, raising costs in experimental research. In this paper we present the Monte Carlo technique applied to simulate the threshold energy for producing final-state particles of a specific two-body process (A + B → C + D), as pedagogical environment to face both computationally and conceptually an experimental analysis. The active/interactive learning-teaching formative process presented here is expected to be an educational resource for reducing young scientists' learning curve and saving time and costs in HEP scientific research.


2022 ◽  
Vol 137 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Richter-Was ◽  
Z. Was

AbstractMatching and comparing the measurements of past and future experiments call for consistency checks of electroweak (EW) calculations used for their interpretation. On the other hand, new calculation schemes of the field theory can be beneficial for precision, even if they may obscure comparisons with earlier results. Over the years, concepts of Improved Born, Effective Born, as well as of effective couplings, in particular of $$\sin ^2\theta _W^{{\textit{eff}}}$$ sin 2 θ W eff mixing angle for EW interactions, have evolved. In our discussion, we use four versions of EW library for phenomenology of practically all HEP accelerator experiments over the last 30 years. We rely on the codes published and archived with the Monte Carlo program for $$e^+e^- \rightarrow f {\bar{f}} n(\gamma )$$ e + e - → f f ¯ n ( γ ) and available for the as well. re-weighs generated events for introduction of EW effects. To this end, is first invoked, and its results are stored in data file and later used. Documentation of upgrade, to version 2.1.0, and that of its new arrangement for semi-automated benchmark plots are provided. In our paper, focus is placed on the numerical results, on the different approximations introduced in Improved Born to obtain Effective Born, which is simpler for applications of strong or QED processes in pp or $$e^+e^-$$ e + e - colliders. The $$\tau $$ τ lepton polarization $$P_{\tau }$$ P τ , forward–backward asymmetry $$A_{{\textit{FB}}}$$ A FB and parton-level total cross section $$\sigma ^{{\textit{tot}}}$$ σ tot are used to monitor the size of EW effects and effective $$\sin ^2\theta _W^{{\textit{eff}}}$$ sin 2 θ W eff picture limitations for precision physics. Collected results include: (i) Effective Born approximations and $$\sin ^2\theta _W^{{\textit{eff}}}$$ sin 2 θ W eff , (ii) differences between versions of EW libraries and (iii) parametric uncertainties due to, for example, $$m_t$$ m t or $$\Delta \alpha _h^{(5)}(s)$$ Δ α h ( 5 ) ( s ) . These results can be considered as benchmarks and also allow to evaluate the adequacy of Effective Born with respect to Improved Born. Definitions are addressed too.


2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (supp01b) ◽  
pp. 607-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHN WOMERSLEY

Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) is a vast domain. In the past twelve months, no fewer than 473 papers with "QCD" in the title were submitted to the hep–ph archive (admittedly, this includes such titles as "Cosmological QCD Phase Transition and Dark Matter"). More relevant, perhaps, is to note that 93 QCD-related abstracts were submitted to the 1999 Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics (EPS99). I shall therefore have to be selective, and will organize this presentation by final state: jets, photons, weak bosons, and heavy flavor. I would like to thank everyone who helped me put this presentation together, and extend my apologies to all those whose work had to be omitted or brutally summarized. I also ask the audience's indulgence for any biases from my particular background as a Tevatron experimenter.


Author(s):  
Preeti Kumari ◽  
◽  
Kavita Lalwani ◽  
Ranjit Dalal ◽  
Ashutosh Bhardwaj ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document