scholarly journals Outcome of Single Dexamethasone Implant Injection in the Treatment of Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema After Anti-VEGF Treatment: Real-Life Data from a Tertiary Hospital in Jordan

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 15 ◽  
pp. 1285-1291
Author(s):  
Motasem Al-Latayfeh ◽  
Mohammad Abdel Rahman ◽  
Raed Shatnawi
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 2271-2289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Focke Ziemssen ◽  
◽  
Joachim Wachtlin ◽  
Laura Kuehlewein ◽  
Maria-Andreea Gamulescu ◽  
...  

Eye ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1594-1599 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Chatziralli ◽  
M Santarelli ◽  
N Patrao ◽  
L Nicholson ◽  
M Zola ◽  
...  

Eye ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 426-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Chhablani ◽  
P Bansal ◽  
D Veritti ◽  
S Sambhana ◽  
V Sarao ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Kodjikian ◽  
David Bellocq ◽  
Thibaud Mathis

Objectives of the Study. Summary of observational studies concerning the pharmacological management of diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods. A literature review was conducted using the PubMed database on 1 February 2018 to identify studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-VEGF and dexamethasone (DEX) implants for DME. Studies with more than 10 patients and follow-up of more than 6 months were selected. Analyses were carried out on the overall population and on subgroups defined according to baseline visual acuity (BVA) and the patients’ naïve or non-naïve status. Results. Thirty-two studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-VEGF and 31 studies evaluating the efficacy of DEX-implants were retained, concerning 6,842 and 1,703 eyes, respectively. A mean gain of +4.7 letters for a mean of 5.8 injections (mean follow-up: 15.6 months) and +9.6 letters for a mean of 1.6 injections (10.3 months) was found in the anti-VEGF and DEX-implant studies, respectively. Final VA appears to be similar for both treatment (62 letters for anti-VEGF, 61.2 letters for DEX-implant), and BVA appears lower for DEX-implant, which may partially explain the greater visual gain. The DEX-implant studies show greater gains in VA compared to the anti-VEGF studies, especially for higher BVA. Indeed, mean gains for the subgroups of patients with BVA<50 letters, 50<BVA<60 letters, and BVA>60 letters are +4.3, +5.8, and +3.1 letters, respectively, in the anti-VEGF studies and +10.5, +9.3, and +8.8 letters, respectively, in the DEX-implant studies. Regarding the patient’s initial status, only naïve status appears to confer the best functional response in DEX-implant studies. Conclusion. Observational studies investigating DEX-implant report clinically similar final VA when compared to anti-VEGF, but superior visual gains in real-life practice. This latter difference could be due to the better BVA, but also to the fact that less injections were administered in the anti-VEGF observational studies than in the interventional studies.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. e0222364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moon Young Choi ◽  
Donghyun Jee ◽  
Jin-woo Kwon

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (12) ◽  
pp. 1341-1350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catharina Busch ◽  
◽  
Samantha Fraser-Bell ◽  
Matias Iglicki ◽  
Marco Lupidi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document