scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of talimogene laherparepvec versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with stage IIIB/C and IVM1a melanoma: subanalysis of the Phase III OPTiM trial

2016 ◽  
Vol Volume 9 ◽  
pp. 7081-7093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Harrington ◽  
Robert Andtbacka ◽  
Frances Collichio ◽  
Gerald Downey ◽  
Lisa Chen ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A628-A628
Author(s):  
Song Park ◽  
Ata Moshiri ◽  
Rouba Hadi ◽  
Austin Green ◽  
Jennifer Gardner ◽  
...  

BackgroundTalimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) has become an increasingly popular treatment option for surgically non-resectable, recurrent melanoma based on its durable efficacy and safety profile. The complete response (CR) rate has been reported to be ~20% with a median of ~9 months to achieve it. [figure 1,2] Assessment of treatment response in those studies has predominantly relied on the clinical impression of the size and color of the lesions. However, in the real-world, decrease of tumor size often occurs rapidly within the first 2–3 months, while improvement of the pigmentation takes several more months. Such clinical observation of lasting pigmentation could be explained by tumoral melanosis – a histopathologic term referring to the presence of a melanophage-rich inflammatory infiltrate without remaining viable tumor cells.MethodsWe hypothesized that residual pigmentation of stable melanoma lesions while on successful T-VEC treatment may represent tumoral melanosis. We also report practical information of such phenomenon including timeline and clinical features.ResultsWe report 6 cases of metastatic cutaneous melanoma treated with T-VEC with excellent pathologic responses. Biopsies of 5 cases were performed after observing variable clinical changes in the injected tumors, with some shrinking or becoming flat, while others grew or became raised. The range of time to biopsy was 4–23 months from the initial treatment date. Pathologic evaluation macular lesions demonstrated non-viable tumor tissue with tumoral melanosis in all cases. In an additional case, clinically increased size of the injected tumor prompted surgical excision, which similarly showed tumoral melanosis without viable tumor. Of note, while size of the tumor was increased, SUV max of the lesion decreased from prior assessment on PET-CT. No patient has developed regrowth or recurrent melanoma of the injected lesions to date (figure 1).Abstract 593 Figure 1Summary of patient characteristicsConclusionsIn patients receiving T-VEC treatment, pathologic CR may be achieved within the first 2–3 months, which precedes clinical improvement of pigmentation. To decrease unnecessary additional T-VEC treatment and assess the response correctly, serial biopsy of stable pigmented lesions should be considered to assess for the presence or absence of viable tumor.AcknowledgementsN/ATrial RegistrationN/AEthics ApprovalIRB exempted for case report with no patient-identifiable informationConsentN/AReferencesHarrington KJ, Andtbacka RH, Collichio F, et al. Efficacy and safety of talimogene laherparepvec versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with stage IIIB/C and IVM1a melanoma: subanalysis of the Phase III OPTiM trial. Onco Targets Ther 2016;9:7081–7093.Andtbacka RHI, Collichio F, Harrington KJ, et al. Final analyses of OPTiM: a randomized phase III trial of talimogene laherparepvec versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in unresectable stage III–IV melanoma.


1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1632-1641 ◽  
Author(s):  
P A Bunn ◽  
J Crowley ◽  
K Kelly ◽  
M B Hazuka ◽  
K Beasley ◽  
...  

PURPOSE This phase III randomized trial was designed to determine if granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) reduces the hematologic toxicity and morbidity induced by chemoradiotherapy in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS This multicenter prospective trial randomized 230 patients to receive chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) with or without GM-CSF given on days 4 to 18 of each of six cycles. The primary end point was hematologic toxicity. Secondary end points included the following: nonhematologic toxicities; days of (1) fever, (2) antibiotics, (3) hospitalization, and (4) infection; number of transfusions; drug doses delivered; and response rates and survival. RESULTS There was a statistically significant increase in the frequency and duration of life-threatening thrombocytopenia (P < .001) in patients randomized to GM-CSF. GM-CSF patients had significantly more toxic deaths (P < .01), more nonhematologic toxicities, more days in hospital, a higher incidence of intravenous (IV) antibiotic usage, and more transfusions. Patients randomized to GM-CSF had higher WBC and neutrophil nadirs (P < .01), but no significant difference in the frequency of grade 4 leukopenia or neutropenia. Patients randomized to GM-CSF had a lower complete response rate (36% v 44%), but the differences were not significant (P = .29). There were no significant differences in survival (median, 14 months on GM-CSF and 17 months on no GM-CSF; P = .15). CONCLUSION GM-CSF, as delivered in this study, should not be included with concurrent chemoradiotherapy treatment programs for limited-stage SCLC. The simultaneous use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) and chemoradiotherapy should be performed only in experimental settings. Chemoradiotherapy programs with cisplatin and etoposide ([VP-16] PE) and simultaneous chest RT produce grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in a small-enough proportion of patients that prophylactic hematopoietic growth factors are clinically unnecessary.


Blood ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 82 (8) ◽  
pp. 2329-2339
Author(s):  
HH Gerhartz ◽  
M Engelhard ◽  
P Meusers ◽  
G Brittinger ◽  
W Wilmanns ◽  
...  

We evaluated recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony- stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF; Sandoz Pharma [Basel, Switzerland]/Schering-Plough [Kenilworth, NJ]) as an adjunct to a modified (mainly cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin increased 1.5-fold) COP-BLAM regimen in the primary treatment of high-grade malignant non- Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). Patients (n = 182; stage II-IV; age, 15 to 73 years) were randomized to rhGM-CSF (400 micrograms) or placebo for 7 days subcutaneously after chemotherapy. Efficacy was analyzed for patients receiving at least 70% of study medication (n = 125). The frequency of clinically relevant infection was reduced by rhGM-CSF (28 v 69 infections, 16 v 30 patients, P = .02) with a cumulative probability of remaining infection free in 70% versus 48% (P = .05 log rank test at 190 days). Periods of neutropenia (P = .01 in 5 of 6 courses), days with fever (2.1 v 4.0, P = .04) and days of hospitalization for infection (3.5 v 8.0 days, P = .01) were significantly reduced. Complete response (CR) rates, assessed by prognostic risk, were 15 of 19 (79%) in treated versus 20 of 21 (95%) in controls in the low-risk group (P = .12). In the high-risk group, 31 of 45 (69%) treated patients achieved CR versus 25 of 52 (48%) of controls (P = .04). No difference in survival has been seen after 1 year. Only injection site reactions (45% treated v 7% controls) and rash (26% v 2%) occurred more frequently in treated patients (n = 176). These data show that rhGM-CSF is well tolerated in most patients with NHL, significantly reduces infection, and improves response.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document