scholarly journals STUDY TO ANALYSE AND COMPARE THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS OF ADVANCED STAGE LUNG CANCER UNDERGOING TWO DIFFERENT MODALITIES OF TREATMENT.

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 1931-1933
Author(s):  
DivyeshKumarVeera K. ◽  
BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett C. Bade ◽  
Geliang Gan ◽  
Fangyong Li ◽  
Lingeng Lu ◽  
Lynn Tanoue ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Lung cancer survivors need more options to improve quality of life (QoL). It is unclear to what extent patients with advanced stage disease are willing to participate in home-based physical activity (PA) and if these interventions improve QoL. The goal of our study was to determine interest in participating in our 3-month home-based walking regimen in patients with advanced stage lung cancer. We used a randomized design to evaluate for potential benefit in PA and patient-reported outcomes. Methods We performed an open-label, 1:1 randomized trial in 40 patients with stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) evaluating enrollment rate, PA, QoL, dyspnea, depression, and biomarkers. Compared to usual care (UC), the intervention group (IG) received an accelerometer, in-person teaching session, and gain-framed text messages for 12 weeks. Results We enrolled 56% (40/71) of eligible patients. Participants were on average 65 years and enrolled 1.9 years from diagnosis. Most patients were women (75%), and receiving treatment (85%) for stage IV (73%) adenocarcinoma (83%). A minority of patients were employed part-time or full time (38%). Both groups reported low baseline PA (IG mean 37 (Standard deviation (SD) 46) vs UC 59 (SD 56) minutes/week; p = 0.25). The IG increased PA more than UC (mean change IG + 123 (SD 212) vs UC + 35 (SD 103) minutes/week; p = 0.051)). Step count in the IG was not statistically different between baseline (4707 step/day), week 6 (5605; p = 0.16), and week 12 (4606 steps/day; p = 0.87). The intervention improved EORTC role functioning domain (17 points; p = 0.022) with borderline improvement in dyspnea (− 13 points; p = 0.051) compared to UC. In patients with two blood samples (25%), we observed a significant increase in soluble PD-1 (219.8 (SD 54.5) pg/mL; p < 0.001). Conclusions Our pilot trial using a 3-month, home-based, mobile health intervention enrolled over half of eligible patients with stage III and IV NSCLC. The intervention increased PA, and may improve several aspects of QoL. We also identified potential biomarker changes relevant to lung cancer biology. Future research should use a larger sample to examine the effect of exercise on cancer biomarkers, which may mediate the association between PA and QoL. Clinical trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03352245).


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 921-927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett C. Bade ◽  
J. Madison Hyer ◽  
Benjamin T. Bevill ◽  
Alex Pastis ◽  
Alana M. Rojewski ◽  
...  

Introduction: Physical activity (PA) is a potential therapy to improve quality of life in patients with advanced-stage lung cancer (LC), but no PA regimen has been shown to be beneficial, clinically practical, and sustainable. We sought to test the hypothesis that a patient-centered activity regimen (PCAR) will improve patient participation and PA more effectively than weekly phone calls. Methods: In patients with advanced-stage LC, we implemented a walking-based activity regimen and motivated patients via either weekly phone calls (n = 29; FitBit Zip accelerometer) or PCAR (n = 15; FitBit Flex, an educational session, and twice-daily gain-framed text messages). Data collection over a 4-week period was compared, and a repeated-measures, mixed-effects model for activity level was constructed. Results: Subjects receiving PCAR more frequently used the device (100% vs 79%) and less frequently had missing data (11% vs 38%). “More active” and “less active” groups were created based on mean step count in the first week. “Less active” patients in the PCAR group increased their PA level, whereas PA level fell in the “more active” group. Most subjects found PCAR helpful (92%) and would participate in another activity study (85%). Discussion: Compared with weekly phone calls, PCAR has higher patient participation, is more likely to improve PA in “less active” subjects, and has high patient satisfaction. A multifaceted PA regimen may be a more efficacious mechanism to study PA in advanced LC. PCAR should be used in a randomized controlled trial to evaluate for improvements in symptom burden, quality of life, and mood.


Lung Cancer ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 115 ◽  
pp. S34 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.S. Evans ◽  
R. Kitson ◽  
R. Shah ◽  
S. Li ◽  
S. Ghosh ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1075-1082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingwei Qi ◽  
Steven E. Schild ◽  
Sumithra J. Mandrekar ◽  
Angelina D. Tan ◽  
James E. Krook ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document