scholarly journals Evaluation of the Effect of Topical Heparin on the Treatment of Facial Burn

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Fawzy Hamza ◽  
Ahmed Salim ◽  
Hossam Rizk
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. e12610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manu Sehrawat ◽  
Niharika Dixit ◽  
Kabir Sardana ◽  
Purnima Malhotra

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruo-Yi Huang ◽  
Szu-Jen Chen ◽  
Yen-Chang Hsiao ◽  
Ling-Wei Kuo ◽  
Chien-Hung Liao ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundAfter clinical evaluation in the emergency department (ED), facial burn patients are usually intubated to protect their airways. However, the possibility of unnecessary intubation or delayed intubation after admission exists. Objective criteria for the evaluation of inhalation injury and the need for airway protection in facial burn patients are needed.MethodsFacial burn patients between January 2013 and May 2016 were reviewed. Patients who were and were not intubated in the ED were compared. All intubated patients received routine bronchoscopy to evaluate whether they had inhalation injuries. Patients with and without confirmed inhalation injuries were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk factors for inhalation injuries in facial burn patients. The reasons for intubation in patients without inhalation injuries were also investigated.ResultsDuring the study period, 121 patients were intubated in the ED among a total of 335 facial burn patients. Only 73 (60.3%) patients were later confirmed to have inhalation injuries on bronchoscopy. The comparison between patients with and without inhalation injuries showed that shortness of breath (odds ratio=3.376, p=0.027) and high total body surface area (TBSA) (odds ratio=1.038, p=0.001) were independent risk factors for inhalation injury. Other physical signs (e.g., hoarseness, burned nostril hair, etc.), laboratory examinations and chest X-ray findings were not predictive of inhalation injury in facial burn patients. All patients with a TBSA over 60% were intubated in the ED even if they did not have inhalation injuries.ConclusionIn the management of facial burn patients, positive signs on conventional physical examinations may not always be predictive of inhalation injury and the need for endotracheal tube intubation in the ED. More attention should be paid to facial burn patients with shortness of breath and a high TBSA because they have an increased risk of inhalation injuries. Airway protection is needed in facial burn patients without inhalation injuries because of their associated injuries and treatment.


Author(s):  
Patrick Watts ◽  
Shahab H. Agha ◽  
Maha Mameesh ◽  
Phillip Conor ◽  
Anuradha Ganesh ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 86 (2S) ◽  
pp. S18-S22
Author(s):  
Kuang-Ling Ou ◽  
Yuan-sheng Tzeng ◽  
Hao-Yu Chiao ◽  
Han-ting Chiu ◽  
Chun-Yu Chen ◽  
...  

Burns ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. S63
Author(s):  
W. Boeckx ◽  
V.D.H. Bert ◽  
G. Kim ◽  
V. Eric ◽  
V. Eric ◽  
...  

EJVES Extra ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 77-78
Author(s):  
C.F.A. Eustatia-Rutten ◽  
J.M. van Baalen ◽  
A.M. Kamper

1998 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 867-868
Author(s):  
Fuat Yüksel
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document