Water distribution system model calibration under uncertainty environments

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Takahashi ◽  
J. G. Saldarriaga ◽  
M. C. Vega ◽  
F. Hernández

The calibration process of water distribution system models allows for accurate and reliable hydraulic analysis results. Thus, calibration is of utmost importance if adequate operation and maintenance model-based procedures are sought. However, in emerging economies, there is a series of factors that make it more difficult to construct accurate models, including very poor information management, unusually high leakages and the presence of a large number of illegal connections. While some of the model variables are assumed to be known under normal circumstances, these factors make it necessary to consider them for calibration as well. This paper presents a calibration methodology flexible enough to address such problems allowing the calibration of pipe diameter, roughness and minor losses, and nodal demands and leakages. A genetic algorithm was implemented as well as a constraint programming algorithm that makes direct use of hydraulic criteria to advance in the solution space. The methodology was tested on a real system in Colombia with a satisfactory outcome. The use of these techniques results in major reduction of calculation time and similar or superior results in comparison to manual methods.

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip R. Page

The sensitivity of a pressurised water distribution system (WDS) to state parameter variations is studied. A novel local regional sensitivity analysis (LRSA) approach is introduced which applies the same change to a collection of parameters, called a region. For example, sensitivity to suburbs can be studied. General analytical (using algebraic methods) results are derived. They show how sensible conclusions arise from LRSA and state this dependence of the WDS on regions for the first time. For most cases, the WDS is 1.852–2 times more sensitive to pipe roughness coefficients than to pipe lengths. In most cases, when certain pipes do not have minor losses, the WDS is 4.871–5.333 times more sensitive to pipe diameters than to pipe lengths. Hence, the WDS is the most sensitive to pipe diameters, medium sensitive to pipe roughness coefficients, and least sensitive to pipe lengths. For most cases, when all reservoir and tank elevations (and heads) remain the same, changes of other elevations do not change flow rates and change the pressures in a simple additive way. In most cases, when all the reservoir water surface elevations are changed together, the flow rates remain unchanged, and the pressures change in a simple additive way.


2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-426
Author(s):  
J. Menaia ◽  
M. Benoliel ◽  
A. Lopes ◽  
C. Neto ◽  
E. Ferreira ◽  
...  

Concerns arise from the possible occurrence of pathogens in drinking water pipe biofilms and storage tank sediments. In these studies, biofilm samples from pipes and sediments from storage tanks of the Lisbon drinking water distribution system were analyzed. Protein determinations and heterotrophic counts on pipe biofilm samples were used to assess the Lisbon network sessile colonization intensity and distribution. Indicator and pathogenic microorganisms were analyzed in pipe biofilm samples, as well as in storage tanks biofilm and sediments, by using cultural methods and PCR, to assess risks. Results have shown that the Lisbon network sessile colonization is relatively weak in intensity. In addition, no meaningful hazards were apparent for both the network biofilm and the storage tanks biofilm and sediments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document