Performance indicators in water and sanitation for developing areas

2001 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 127-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Pybus ◽  
G. Schoeman

There is a move throughout the developed world to introduce benchmarking techniques to the management of water and sanitation systems. The indicators that are being considered for benchmarking purposes tend to cover a broad band of activities that are part of the scope of management of large organisations. Most of the lists that have been prepared do not really cater for the implementation and operation of small rural schemes. The greatest need is the implementation of sustainable schemes for this category of consumer. The implementation of a rural water and sanitation scheme involves the negotiation in the initial stages with the local community representatives of what the community wants and how it will be provided and operated. This may have to be preceded by a period of empowerment so that the negotiations can be conducted by informed people. At the conclusion of the negotiations a business plan can be prepared that should be implemented in association with the community. The project is at this stage mainly in the control of a professional engineer, responsible for the technical interpretation of the business plan and the management of the construction phase. Finally, after commissioning, a water service provider will be responsible for the operation, management and maintenance of the scheme on a sustainable basis. The key actions and activities are identified and performance criteria defined. As communication at the beginning of the project is a critical component, the success of this is confirmed by examination and discussion as to how much has in fact been communicated and understood correctly. Other performance indicators for the operational phase are derived from the conventional ones used in the developed world. Finally, it is important that the participants, do not see the measurement of performance as a threatening situation, but rather a stepping stone to improvement of not only performance, but also of subsequent reward.

1997 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 682
Author(s):  
M.A. Thackray

This paper deals with the efforts and results of a Management driven campaign to improve contractor safety performance in WAPET's operations.WAPET Management identified Contractor safety performance as one of four key safety focus areas in their 1995 Business Plan. The other focus areas were Hazard Analysis, Training and Audit and Review.Strategies adopted for achieving improvements in contractor safety included:aligning Contractor Goals and Objectives with WAPET's by involving major contractors in 'Best Practices' workshops. The workshops specifically addressed the Business Plan focus areas and the identification and measurement of performance indicators. The workshops provided contractors with an open forum to express their views and efforts in these areas;holding follow-up meetings with individual contractors and contractor groups with common areas of work. Both contractors and WAPET management detailed the status and efforts being put into these areas. These meetings identified improvement opportunities and opened up communication links both with WAPET personnel and between contractors; andimplementing the results of the workshop and meetings by upgrading WAPET's Safety Management System particularly in the areas of pre-qualification, contracting philosophies and contractor management philosophies.Feedback on each stage of the 1995 program was used to determine the strategies for the 1996 program. The workshops and meetings highlighted process improvement opportunities particularly in areas of industry standardisation, development of contractor Safety Management Systems, lines of communication/accountability, employee involvement and performance indicators. These opportunities were documented in a 'Contractor Best Practice* manual of which over 350 have been distributed.Conventional safety measures indicate a 50 per cent improvement in both LTI and Total Reportable frequency rates for WAPET's contractors in the past 12 months. The success of the program was also demonstrated by other indicators such as greater openness in communications, greater participation in safety meetings and a closer working relationship with WAPET.


2020 ◽  
pp. 34-41
Author(s):  
S. S. Volkova

The article is devoted to the problems of evaluating the effectiveness of regional state budgetary secondary vocational institutions in the Altai Territory. The author analyzing the methods used in practice for assessing the activities of professional educational organizations, determines the degree of development of existing assessment models, and considers modern interpretations of the concepts of “criterion” and “indicator”. The current practice of monitoring the activities of professional educational organizations allows to compare the content and structural elements of all existing systems, the results of which revealed duplication of criteria and a methodological error in the form of substitution of effectiveness indicators with performance indicators. To eliminate the identified violation, as well as the justification of decisions on the development of the vocational secondary education, the the author proposes the ways, improving the assessment system when conducting regional and federal monitoring of this area of activity through the development and application, also effectiveness and performance criteria.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 5609-5628
Author(s):  
Maha Jawad Kadam ◽  
Zaman Imad Abd AL Ameer

The current research seeks to study and analyze performance indicators and standards and its variables, the research relied on the historical method in studying the previous indicators by returning to the measures related to indicators and performance standards presented by a different group of writers and researchers, performance criteria were analyzed to determine the level and size of the gap between actual performance and planned performance. The study reached a set of conclusions, the most important of which is that the concept of Performance and performance indicators are topics that are characterized by intellectual and cognitive richness. Perhaps the reason for this difference is due to the difference in the fields and areas in which researchers studied the concept and performance indicators. As well as the cognitive, cultural and intellectual differences of researchers in this concept. As for the most important recommendations of the research, it referred to the invitation of organizations to strive hard in determining their own performance indicators. The organization can stand alone from the competing organizations in defining special indicators to measure its performance that will enable it to achieve a competitive advantage.


Author(s):  
P. V. Golovanov ◽  
A. N. Kulikova

This article describes economic relations, associated with the management of an industrial enterprise using a budgeting system integrated with a quality management system. The Article covers the problems of defining key performance indicators and performance criteria in the budgeting system processes of industrial enterprises.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document