Оn the issue of setting priorities in the organization of risk-based supervision over the safety of consumer products traded on the common economic space of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan

This chapter examines the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) from the perspective of the main theories in the Discipline of International Relations (IR). The author sketches out the main stages of the development of the EAEU cooperation by highlighting the conceptualization of the scheme by President Nazarbayev of Kazakhstan in 1994, the establishment of the Customs Union (CU), and the Common Economic Space (CES) between Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan in 2010. Theories analyzed include Neo-Realism, Neo-Classic Realism, Hegemonic Stability Theory, Liberalism, Functionalism, Neo-Functionalism, Neo-Institutionalism, the English School, Constructivism, and Neo-Gramscian Theory. The author makes an overall evaluation and stresses the need for an eclectic approach for analyzing the EAEU experience.

Download Full-text

Mechanism of Public Support for Agricultural Production in the Countries of the Common Economic Space

Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia ◽

10.13005/bbra/1783 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 12 (2) ◽

pp. 1287-1296

Author(s):

Mikhail Ivanovich Sigarev ◽

Zhakipbek Myrzagazievich Nurkuzhayev ◽

Raya Orazgalievna Nurgaliyeva ◽

Lyazzat Tursymbayevna Alshembayeva

Keyword(s):

Agricultural Production ◽

Public Support ◽

Economic Space ◽

The Common

Download Full-text

Paradigm of the Common Economic Space Formation in the Context of Globalization

Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences ◽

10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n3s6p155 ◽

2015 ◽

Author(s):

Innessa Efremenko ◽

Taniana Panasenkova ◽

Natalya Vovchenko

Keyword(s):

Economic Space ◽

The Common

Download Full-text

Low-Carbon Transition as Vehicle of New Inequalities? Risk-Class, the Chinese Middle-Class and the Moral Economy of Misrecognition

Theory Culture & Society ◽

10.1177/0263276419869438 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (2) ◽

pp. 131-156 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Dean Curran ◽

David Tyfield

Keyword(s):

Middle Class ◽

Common Good ◽

Political Process ◽

Moral Economy ◽

Consumer Products ◽

Low Carbon ◽

Risk Class ◽

The Common ◽

Policy Discussion ◽

Transition Studies

Low-carbon innovation is usually depicted as an exemplar of pursuit of the common good, in both mainstream policy discussion and the emerging orthodoxy of transition studies. Yet it may emerge as a key means of intensifying inequality. We analyse low-carbon innovation as a social and political process through the prism of differential risk-classes, focusing on the pivotal global case of emergence of the Chinese middle-class in seaboard megacities, especially regarding the profound challenges of urban e-mobility transition. This approach shows emergence of this still-forming sociopolitical grouping as tightly and complementarily coupled with the assembling of innovations that meaningfully tackle global risks, such as climate change, while also intensifying existing inequalities. Misrecognition of the duality of low-carbon innovations as both moral technologies and as relatively expensive consumer products has the potentiality to be a key mechanism of this process, thereby serving to reproduce, constitute and legitimize inequalities in novel and unexpected ways.

Download Full-text