scholarly journals Successful Surgical and Endovascular Multidisciplinary Therapy for Mid-aortic Syndrome with Complicated Atherosclerotic Comorbidities in an Older Patient

Author(s):  
Runa Emoto ◽  
Shoichiro Yatsu ◽  
Takuma Yoshihara ◽  
Eiryu Sai ◽  
Tadashi Miyazaki ◽  
...  
ASHA Leader ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 14-17
Author(s):  
Harvey Abrams
Keyword(s):  

Swiss Surgery ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 116-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Schmassmann

Surgical resection is the first choice of treatment for patients with hepatocellular (HCC) and cholangiocellular carcinomas. Prolongation of survival is, however, the only realistic goal for most patients, which can be often achieved by nonsurgical therapies. Inoperable patients with large or multiple HCCs are usually treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with lipiodol in combination with a chemotherapeutic drug and gelfoam. Three-year survival depends on the stage of the disease and is about 20%. Patients with earlier tumor stages (one or two tumor nodules less than 3cm in size) are suitable for treatment with percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) alone or in combination with TACE. Several studies have shown that in these early stages, the 3-year survival rate is approximately 55%-70% in the actively treated patients which is significantly higher than in untreated patients. In advanced stages of the disease, TACE and PEI have no effect on survival and should not be performed. Some of these patients have been successfully treated with octreotide. Patients with inoperable cholangiocellular carcinoma are treated by endoscopic or percutaneous stent placement. If stenting does not achieve adequate biliary drainage, multidisciplinary therapy including internal / external radiotherapy or photodynamic therapy should be considered in patients with potential long-term survival. In conclusion, nonresectional therapies play an essential role in the therapy of inoperable hepato- and cholangiocellular carcinomas as they lead to satisfactory survival. Multidisciplinary therapy appears to be the current trend of management.


Medic ro ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (125) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Liliana-Ana Tuţă ◽  
Laura Condur ◽  
Alina Mihaela Stăniguţ ◽  
Camelia Pană

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 277-279
Author(s):  
Lauren Maree Turner ◽  
Shelley Ji Eu Hwang ◽  
Genevieve Bennett ◽  
Andrew C Miller

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ammoren Dohm ◽  
Roberto Diaz ◽  
Ronica H. Nanda

HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S339-S340
Author(s):  
M. Hamano ◽  
S. Katagiri ◽  
M. Oota ◽  
S. Onizawa ◽  
Y. Niwa ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 739-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Adunsky ◽  
E. Rubinstein ◽  
A. Goldsmith

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000492
Author(s):  
Sarah Derby ◽  
Matthew Forshaw ◽  
Caroline Lowrie ◽  
Derek Grose ◽  
Husam Marashi ◽  
...  

BackgroundOesophageal cancer remains a common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Increasingly, oncology centres are treating an older population and comorbidities may preclude multimodality treatment with chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We review outcomes of radical radiotherapy (RT) in an older population treating squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) oesophagus.MethodsPatients over 65 years receiving RT for SCC oesophagus between 2013 and 2016 in the West of Scotland were identified. Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) between patients treated with radical RT and radical CRT.ResultsThere were 83 patients over 65 years treated with either RT (n=21) or CRT (n=62). There was no significant difference in median OS between CRT versus RT (26.8 months vs 28.5 months, p=0.92). All patients receiving RT completed their treatment whereas 11% of CRT patients did not complete treatment.ConclusionSurvival in this non-trial older patient group managed with CRT is comparable to that reported in previous trials. RT shows better than expected outcomes which may reflect developments in RT technique. This review supports RT as an alternative in older patients, unfit for concurrent treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document