Audiologic Management of the Older Patient

ASHA Leader ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 14-17
Author(s):  
Harvey Abrams
Keyword(s):  
Medic ro ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (125) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Liliana-Ana Tuţă ◽  
Laura Condur ◽  
Alina Mihaela Stăniguţ ◽  
Camelia Pană

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 277-279
Author(s):  
Lauren Maree Turner ◽  
Shelley Ji Eu Hwang ◽  
Genevieve Bennett ◽  
Andrew C Miller

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ammoren Dohm ◽  
Roberto Diaz ◽  
Ronica H. Nanda

1996 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 739-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Adunsky ◽  
E. Rubinstein ◽  
A. Goldsmith

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000492
Author(s):  
Sarah Derby ◽  
Matthew Forshaw ◽  
Caroline Lowrie ◽  
Derek Grose ◽  
Husam Marashi ◽  
...  

BackgroundOesophageal cancer remains a common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Increasingly, oncology centres are treating an older population and comorbidities may preclude multimodality treatment with chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We review outcomes of radical radiotherapy (RT) in an older population treating squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) oesophagus.MethodsPatients over 65 years receiving RT for SCC oesophagus between 2013 and 2016 in the West of Scotland were identified. Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) between patients treated with radical RT and radical CRT.ResultsThere were 83 patients over 65 years treated with either RT (n=21) or CRT (n=62). There was no significant difference in median OS between CRT versus RT (26.8 months vs 28.5 months, p=0.92). All patients receiving RT completed their treatment whereas 11% of CRT patients did not complete treatment.ConclusionSurvival in this non-trial older patient group managed with CRT is comparable to that reported in previous trials. RT shows better than expected outcomes which may reflect developments in RT technique. This review supports RT as an alternative in older patients, unfit for concurrent treatment.


Rare Tumors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 203636132110264
Author(s):  
Andrea Dekanić ◽  
Marko Velepič ◽  
Margita Belušić Gobić ◽  
Ita Hadžisejdić ◽  
Nives Jonjić

Malignant mesenchymal tumors of oropharyngeal mucosa are rare. Those with fibroblastic and histiocytic differentiation in the skin are called atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) and in the soft tissue undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS). Here we present a case of an older patient with a history of multiple basal cell carcinomas and recently with a rapidly growing polypoid lesion in the mucosa of posterior oropharyngeal wall with AFX/UPS morphology. The differential diagnosis, histological pitfalls of this poorly characterized mesenchymal lesions, and the challenges associated with treatment are discussed.


Pharmaceutics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Nélio Drumond ◽  
Sven Stegemann

Oral drug administration provided as solid oral dosage forms (SODF) remains the major route of drug therapy in primary and secondary care. There is clear evidence for a growing number of clinically relevant swallowing issues (e.g., dysphagia) in the older patient population, especially when considering the multimorbid, frail, and polymedicated patients. Swallowing impairments have a negative impact on SODF administration, which leads to poor adherence and inappropriate alterations (e.g., crushing, splitting). Different strategies have been proposed over the years in order to enhance the swallowing experience with SODF, by using conventional administration techniques or applying swallowing aids and devices. Nevertheless, new formulation designs must be considered by implementing a patient centric approach in order to efficiently improve SODF administration by older patient populations. Together with appropriate SODF size reductions, innovative film coating materials that can be applied to SODF and provide swallowing safety and efficacy with little effort being required by the patients are still needed. With that in mind, a literature review was conducted in order to identify the availability of patient centric coating materials claiming to shorten esophageal transit times and improve the overall SODF swallowing experience for older patients. The majority of coating technologies were identified in patent applications, and they mainly included well-known water soluble polymers that are commonly applied into pharmaceutical coatings. Nevertheless, scientific evidence demonstrating the benefits of given SODF coating materials in the concerned patient populations are still very limited. Consequently, the availability for safe, effective, and clinically proven solutions to address the increasing prevalence of swallowing issues in the older patient population is still limited.


Author(s):  
Linda Duska ◽  
Armin Shahrokni ◽  
Melanie Powell

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer, and with a median age of 62 at diagnosis, it affects a significant number of older women. With increasing age and obesity rates in the world’s population, there is an anticipated concomitant increase in older women with endometrial cancer. Older women are more likely to die of endometrial cancer compared with younger patients. Reasons for this include more aggressive tumor biology, less favorable clinicopathologic features, and more advanced disease. Other factors, however, such as reluctance to offer surgical treatment to the older patient and increased complications of treatment are likely to be important. Management of endometrial cancer requires multidisciplinary care (surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy). For each treatment, the feasibility (related to technical aspect of the procedure/treatment), side effects and safety (related to older-patient factors), and the overall benefit as it pertains to older women with endometrial cancer should be assessed carefully with a multidisciplinary approach. Despite the importance of these issues, the data are limited to answer these issues with clarity. In this article, we will review each treatment modality for older women with endometrial cancer. We will introduce the components of comprehensive geriatric assessment and their practical implication for older women with cancer in general and older women with endometrial cancer specifically.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document