scholarly journals Collaborative Project: Improving the Representation of Coastal and Estuarine Processes in Earth System Models

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Bryan ◽  
John Dennis ◽  
Parker MacCready ◽  
Michael Whitney
Keyword(s):  
Earth System ◽  
Collaborative Project ◽  
System Models ◽  
Estuarine Processes ◽  
Earth System Models

scholarly journals Final Report Collaborative Project. Improving the Representation of Coastal and Estuarine Processes in Earth System Models

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Bryan ◽  
John Dennis ◽  
Parker MacCready ◽  
Michael Whitney
Keyword(s):  
Final Report ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Collaborative Project ◽  
System Models ◽  
Estuarine Processes ◽  
Earth System Models

scholarly journals Final Report Collaborative Project: Improving the Representation of Coastal and Estuarine Processes in Earth System Models

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Bryan ◽  
John Dennis ◽  
Parker MacCready ◽  
Michael M. Whitney
Keyword(s):  
Final Report ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Collaborative Project ◽  
System Models ◽  
Estuarine Processes ◽  
Earth System Models

scholarly journals Collaborative Project. Mode and Intermediate Waters in Earth System Models

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge L. Sarmiento ◽  
◽  
Carolina Dufour ◽  
Keith B. Rodgers
Keyword(s):  
Earth System ◽  
Collaborative Project ◽  
System Models ◽  
Intermediate Waters ◽  
Earth System Models

scholarly journals The evaluation of Earth System Models: discussion summary

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 216-221
Author(s):  
Sönke Zaehle ◽  
Colin Prentice ◽  
Sarah Cornell
Keyword(s):  
Earth System ◽  
System Models ◽  
Earth System Models

scholarly journals Using field observations to inform thermal hydrology models of permafrost dynamics with ATS (v0.83)

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 3235-3292 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. L. Atchley ◽  
S. L. Painter ◽  
D. R. Harp ◽  
E. T. Coon ◽  
C. J. Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Sink ◽  
Thermal Response ◽  
Field Measurements ◽  
Early Summer ◽  
Active Layer Thickness ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Model Refinement ◽  
System Models ◽  
Developed Surface ◽  
Earth System Models

Abstract. Climate change is profoundly transforming the carbon-rich Arctic tundra landscape, potentially moving it from a carbon sink to a carbon source by increasing the thickness of soil that thaws on a seasonal basis. However, the modeling capability and precise parameterizations of the physical characteristics needed to estimate projected active layer thickness (ALT) are limited in Earth System Models (ESMs). In particular, discrepancies in spatial scale between field measurements and Earth System Models challenge validation and parameterization of hydrothermal models. A recently developed surface/subsurface model for permafrost thermal hydrology, the Advanced Terrestrial Simulator (ATS), is used in combination with field measurements to calibrate and identify fine scale controls of ALT in ice wedge polygon tundra in Barrow, Alaska. An iterative model refinement procedure that cycles between borehole temperature and snow cover measurements and simulations functions to evaluate and parameterize different model processes necessary to simulate freeze/thaw processes and ALT formation. After model refinement and calibration, reasonable matches between simulated and measured soil temperatures are obtained, with the largest errors occurring during early summer above ice wedges (e.g. troughs). The results suggest that properly constructed and calibrated one-dimensional thermal hydrology models have the potential to provide reasonable representation of the subsurface thermal response and can be used to infer model input parameters and process representations. The models for soil thermal conductivity and snow distribution were found to be the most sensitive process representations. However, information on lateral flow and snowpack evolution might be needed to constrain model representations of surface hydrology and snow depth.

scholarly journals Evolution of the Arabian Sea Upwelling from the Last Millennium to the Future as Simulated by Earth System Models

Climate ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 72
Author(s):  
Xing Yi ◽  
Birgit Hünicke ◽  
Eduardo Zorita
Keyword(s):  
Arabian Sea ◽  
Positive Trend ◽  
Last Millennium ◽  
Earth System ◽  
System Models ◽  
Sediment Records ◽  
The Future ◽  
Water Stratification ◽  
Arabian Sea Upwelling ◽  
Earth System Models

Arabian Sea upwelling in the past has been generally studied based on the sediment records. We apply two earth system models and analyze the simulated water vertical velocity to investigate coastal upwelling in the western Arabian Sea over the last millennium. In addition, two models with slightly different configurations are also employed to study the upwelling in the 21st century under the strongest and the weakest greenhouse gas emission scenarios. With a negative long-term trend caused by the orbital forcing of the models, the upwelling over the last millennium is found to be closely correlated with the sea surface temperature, the Indian summer Monsoon and the sediment records. The future upwelling under the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 scenario reveals a negative trend, in contrast with the positive trend displayed by the upwelling favorable along-shore winds. Therefore, it is likely that other factors, like water stratification in the upper ocean layers caused by the stronger surface warming, overrides the effect from the upwelling favorable wind. No significant trend is found for the upwelling under the RCP2.6 scenario, which is likely due to a compensation between the opposing effects of the increase in upwelling favorable winds and the water stratification.

GFDL’s ESM2 Global Coupled Climate–Carbon Earth System Models. Part I: Physical Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (19) ◽  
pp. 6646-6665 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. Dunne ◽  
Jasmin G. John ◽  
Alistair J. Adcroft ◽  
Stephen M. Griffies ◽  
Robert W. Hallberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Changes ◽  
Southern Oscillation ◽  
Heat Content ◽  
Ocean Dynamics ◽  
Thermocline Depth ◽  
Earth System ◽  
System Models ◽  
Model Version ◽  
Earth System Models

Abstract The physical climate formulation and simulation characteristics of two new global coupled carbon–climate Earth System Models, ESM2M and ESM2G, are described. These models demonstrate similar climate fidelity as the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory’s previous Climate Model version 2.1 (CM2.1) while incorporating explicit and consistent carbon dynamics. The two models differ exclusively in the physical ocean component; ESM2M uses Modular Ocean Model version 4p1 with vertical pressure layers while ESM2G uses Generalized Ocean Layer Dynamics with a bulk mixed layer and interior isopycnal layers. Differences in the ocean mean state include the thermocline depth being relatively deep in ESM2M and relatively shallow in ESM2G compared to observations. The crucial role of ocean dynamics on climate variability is highlighted in El Niño–Southern Oscillation being overly strong in ESM2M and overly weak in ESM2G relative to observations. Thus, while ESM2G might better represent climate changes relating to total heat content variability given its lack of long-term drift, gyre circulation, and ventilation in the North Pacific, tropical Atlantic, and Indian Oceans, and depth structure in the overturning and abyssal flows, ESM2M might better represent climate changes relating to surface circulation given its superior surface temperature, salinity, and height patterns, tropical Pacific circulation and variability, and Southern Ocean dynamics. The overall assessment is that neither model is fundamentally superior to the other, and that both models achieve sufficient fidelity to allow meaningful climate and earth system modeling applications. This affords the ability to assess the role of ocean configuration on earth system interactions in the context of two state-of-the-art coupled carbon–climate models.

Challenges in simulating sea ice in Earth System Models

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 509-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Notz
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Earth System ◽  
System Models ◽  
Earth System Models

Assessing the capacity of Earth System Models to simulate spatiotemporal variability in fire weather indicators

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Gallo Granizo ◽  
Jonathan Eden ◽  
Bastien Dieppois ◽  
Matthew Blackett
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Fire Danger ◽  
Spatiotemporal Variability ◽  
Global Evaluation ◽  
Fire Weather ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Fire Weather Index ◽  
System Models ◽  
Earth System Models

<p>Weather and climate play an important role in shaping global fire regimes and geographical distributions of burnable areas. At the global scale, fire danger is likely to increase in the near future due to warmer temperatures and changes in precipitation patterns, as projected by the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). There is a need to develop the most reliable projections of future climate-driven fire danger to enable decision makers and forest managers to take both targeted proactive actions and to respond to future fire events.</p><p>Climate change projections generated by Earth System Models (ESMs) provide the most important basis for understanding past, present and future changes in the climate system and its impacts. ESMs are, however, subject to systematic errors and biases, which are not fully taken into account when developing risk scenarios for wild fire activity. Projections of climate-driven fire danger have often been limited to the use of single models or the mean of multi-model ensembles, and compared to a single set of observational data (e.g. one index derived from one reanalysis).</p><p>Here, a comprehensive global evaluation of the representation of a series of fire weather indicators in the latest generation of ESMs is presented. Seven fire weather indices from the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System were generated using daily fields realisations simulated by 25 ESMs from the 6<sup>th</sup> Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). With reference to observational and reanalysis datasets, we quantify the capacity of each model to realistically simulate the variability, magnitude and spatial extent of fire danger. The highest-performing models are identified and, subsequently, the limitations of combining models based on independency and equal performance when generating fire danger projections are discussed. To conclude, recommendations are given for the development of user- and policy-driven model evaluation at spatial scales relevant for decision-making and forest management.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document