Separation, Characterization and Discriminant Analysis of Subvisible Particles in Biologics Formulations

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 232-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahir S. Akhunzada ◽  
Mario Hubert ◽  
Erinc Sahin ◽  
James Pratt

Background:The presence of subvisible particles (SVPs) in parenteral formulations of biologics is a major challenge in the development of therapeutic protein formulations. Distinction between proteinaceous and non-proteinaceous SVPs is vital in monitoring formulation stability.Methods:The current compendial method based on light obscuration (LO) has limitations in the analysis of translucent/low refractive index particles. A number of attempts have been made to develop an unambiguous method to characterize SVPs, albeit with limited success.Results:Herein, we describe a robust method that characterizes and distinguishes both potentially proteinaceous and non-proteinaceous SVPs in protein formulations using Microflow imaging (MFI) in conjunction with the MVAS software (MFI View Analysis Suite), developed by ProteinSimple. The method utilizes two Intensity parameters and a morphological filter that successfully distinguishes proteinaceous SVPs from non-proteinaceous SVPs and mixed aggregates.Conclusion:he MFI generated raw data of a protein sample is processed through Lumetics LINK software that applies an in-house developed filter to separate proteinaceous from the rest of the particulates.

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-66
Author(s):  
Luísa Carvalho

The presence of subvisible particles (SVPs) in parenteral formulations of biologics is a major challenge in the development of therapeutic protein formulations. Distinction between proteinaceous and non-proteinaceous SVPs is vital in monitoring formulation stability.


2015 ◽  
Vol 87 (12) ◽  
pp. 6119-6124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anacelia Ríos Quiroz ◽  
Gabriela Québatte ◽  
Fabian Stump ◽  
Christof Finkler ◽  
Joerg Huwyler ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 832-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masato Kiyoshi ◽  
Hiroko Shibata ◽  
Akira Harazono ◽  
Tetsuo Torisu ◽  
Takahiro Maruno ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 1671-1678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henryk Mach ◽  
Akhilesh Bhambhani ◽  
Brian K. Meyer ◽  
Steven Burek ◽  
Harrison Davis ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Camarata ◽  
Lisa Erwin

This paper presents a case study of a language-impaired child who signaled the distinction between English singular and plural using suprasegmental cues rather than the usual segmental form used within the parent language. Acoustic analyses performed within the first study in the paper revealed that the suprasegmental features used to maintain this distinction included various duration, fundamental frequency, and intensity parameters. Acoustic analyses Were also performed on a set of matched two- and four-item plural forms within a second study. The results of these analyses indicated that the same acoustic parameters were used to distinguish two-item plural forms from four-item plural forms. This case of linguistic creativity is offered as further evidence in support of the model of language acquisition that emphasizes the active role children take in the acquisition process. Additionally, the phonological, morphological, and psycholinguistic factors that may contribute to such rule invention are discussed.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jukka Rantanen ◽  
Hjalte Trnka ◽  
Jian Wu ◽  
Marco van de Weert ◽  
Holger Grohganz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document