Elevated Microsatellite Alterations at Selected Tetranucleotide Repeats (EMAST) and Microsatellite Instability in Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Its Clinical Features

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 829-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.S. Lee ◽  
K.U. Park ◽  
D.-W. Kim ◽  
M.H. lhn ◽  
W.H. Kim ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15591-e15591
Author(s):  
Ming Huang Chen ◽  
Shih-Ching Chang ◽  
Jen-Kou Lin ◽  
Shung-Haur Yang ◽  
Jeng-Kai Jiang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueyun Huo ◽  
Dandan Feng ◽  
Shuangyue Zhang ◽  
Zhenkun Li ◽  
Xiaohong Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI) has been known as a biomarker for better outcome in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the conclusion is controversy. In addition, MS can also be a useful marker for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of genes but it has not been well studied yet. Here, aimed to clarify the predictive value of MSI/LOH within tumor-related genes in CRCs, we detected MSI/LOH of MSs in tumor-related genes and the Bethesda (B5) panel and further analyzed the relationship between MSI/LOH and clinical features or outcomes. Results: As expected, the MSI rate of B5 loci were all very high, suggesting that B5 panel criterion is powerful for MSI status determining of CRCs. Interestingly, MSI/LOH of 2 loci in the B5 panel and 12 loci in tumor-related genes were associated with poorer outcome while MSI/LOH of B5 panel was failed to predict outcomes of CRCs. MSI of BAT25, MSI/LOH of BAT26 and MSI of B5 panel showed closer relationship with mucinous carcinoma. In addition, LOH-H of B5 panel associated with more lymphatic metastasis. Conclusions: In summary, MSI/LOH of certain loci or whole panel of B5 were related to the clinical features, and several loci within tumor-related genes showed a prognostic value in outcomes of CRCs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1534-1542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming‐Huang Chen ◽  
Shih‐Ching Chang ◽  
Pei‐Ching Lin ◽  
Shung‐Haur Yang ◽  
Chun‐Chi Lin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueyun Huo ◽  
Dandan Feng ◽  
Shuangyue Zhang ◽  
Zhenkun Li ◽  
Xiaohong Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a biomarker for better outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, this conclusion is controversial. In addition, MSs can be a useful marker for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of genes, but this finding has not been well studied. Here, we aimed to clarify the predictive value of MSI/LOH within tumor-related genes in CRC. Methods We detected MSI/LOH of MSs in tumor-related genes and the Bethesda (B5) panel by STR scanning and cloning/sequencing. We further analyzed the relationship between MSI/LOH status and clinical features or outcomes by Pearson’s Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test and the Kaplan–Meier method. Results The findings indicated that the MSI rates of B5 loci were all higher than those of loci in tumor-related genes. Interestingly, MSI/LOH of 2 loci in the B5 panel and 12 loci in tumor-related genes were associated with poorer outcomes, while MSI/LOH of the B5 panel failed to predict outcomes in CRC. MSI of BAT25, MSI/LOH of BAT26 and MSI of the B5 panel showed closer relationships with mucinous carcinoma. In addition, LOH-H of the B5 panel was associated with increased lymphatic metastasis. Conclusions In summary, MSI/LOH of certain loci or the whole panel of B5 is related to clinical features, and several loci within tumor-related genes showed prognostic value in the outcomes of CRC.


2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
A J Hyde ◽  
D Fontaine ◽  
R C Green ◽  
M Simms ◽  
P S Parfrey ◽  
...  

Background: Lynch Syndrome is an autosomal dominant trait that accounts forapproximately 3% of all cases of colorectal cancer (CRC). It is caused by mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, most commonly MLH1 or MSH2. These MMR defects cause high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) in the tumours. MSI testing of all CRCs to identify potential Lynch Syndrome cases is not practical, so the Bethesda Guidelines, which use clinical and pathological features, were created to identify those tumours most likely to be MSI-H^1. In 2007 Jenkins et. al. created MsPath, a tool based on the pathological features described in the rarely used 3^rd Bethesda criterion, to improve prediction of MSI-H tumours among CRC cases diagnosed before age 60 years^2. Methods: We collected a population-based cohort of 716 CRC cases diagnosed before age 75 years in Newfoundland. For each of these cases we collected family history, performed MSI analysis, and scored a number of pathological features for the purpose of evaluating the accuracy of the Bethesda Criteria and MsPath at predicting MSI-H tumours. Results: Our work validates the MsPath tool in the Newfoundland population for the same age group used to create the tool. We found it identified MSI-H cases with a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 35% in our population of CRCcases diagnosed before age 60 years (n=290). We also tested this tool on our older population of CRCcases, diagnosed at ages 60 to 74 years (n=426). We found it to be at least as predictive in this population,with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 42%. We then used our entire cohort (N=716) to compare MsPath with the other Bethesda criteria.Bethesda criteria 1, 2, 4 and 5 together predicted MSI-H cases with a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 51%. MsPath was better at identifying these cases, with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 39%. Conclusions: We conclude that MsPath can be extended to include patients diagnosed with CRC before age 75 years. As well, we have found that MsPath is a better predictive tool than the Revised Bethesda Guidelines for identifying MSI-H cases within a population-based setting of colorectal cancer. References: 1. Umar, A. et. al. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:261-8 2.Jenkins, M.A. et. al. Gastroenterology 2007;133:48-56


1998 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 383-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pilar Iniesta ◽  
Carmen de Juan ◽  
Trinidad Caldes ◽  
Francisco-Jose Vega ◽  
Maria-Jose Massa ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 216 (1) ◽  
pp. 152769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xian-hui Zhang ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Ya-qi Wang ◽  
Lei Zhu ◽  
Lan Ma

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document