Chromosome 9 Inversion: Pathogenic or Benign? A Comprehensive Systematic Review of all Clinical Reports

Background: Inversion of chromosome 9 (inv[9]) is known as one of the most common structural balanced chromosomal variations. Chromosome 9 is highly susceptible to structural rearrangements, specifically to pericentric inversions. Various investigators have posited that inv(9) with different breakpoints could be the cause of several abnormal conditions in individuals, whereas others have considered it a benign variant. To our knowledge, a consensus regarding the effects of this inversion has yet to emerge. Objective: This study aims to discuss the pathogenic/benign effects of inv(9) in all possible clinical conditions detected in the occurrence of this abnormality. Methods: Studies on inv(9) were collected via PubMed, MalaCards, Google Scholar, and NORD, along with the search terms of inv(9), pericentric inv(9), and chromosome 9 variants. Additionally, the incidence of inv(9) and the karyotype and clinical findings of individuals reported with this variant were investigated. Results: The collection of the studies reviewed shows that inv(9) is associated with various conditions such as congenital anomalies, growth retardation, infertility, recurrent pregnancy loss, and cancer. The clinical features associated with this variant in humans vary between growth stages. Further, there have been no shared clinical findings in a specific period. Conclusions: Although there is no conclusive evidence for the pathogenicity of this rearrangement, prenatal genetic counseling on inv(9) and further clinical and molecular studies would be helpful in chromosome 9-related problems.

Download Full-text

Potential genetic causes of miscarriage in euploid pregnancies: a systematic review

Human Reproduction Update ◽

10.1093/humupd/dmz015 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 25 (4) ◽

pp. 452-472 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Emily Colley ◽

Susan Hamilton ◽

Paul Smith ◽

Neil V Morgan ◽

Arri Coomarasamy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Copy Number Variation ◽

Exome Sequencing ◽

Copy Number ◽

Pregnancy Loss ◽

Recurrent Pregnancy Loss ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Genetic Causes ◽

Search Terms ◽

Number Variation

Abstract BACKGROUND Approximately 50% of pregnancy losses are caused by chromosomal abnormalities, such as aneuploidy. The remainder has an apparent euploid karyotype, but it is plausible that there are cases of pregnancy loss with other genetic aberrations that are not currently routinely detected. Studies investigating the use of exome sequencing and chromosomal microarrays in structurally abnormal pregnancies and developmental disorders have demonstrated their clinical application and/or potential utility in these groups of patients. Similarly, there have been several studies that have sought to identify genes that are potentially causative of, or associated with, spontaneous pregnancy loss, but the evidence has not yet been synthesized. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE The objective was to identify studies that have recorded monogenic genetic contributions to pregnancy loss in euploid pregnancies, establish evidence for genetic causes of pregnancy loss, identify the limitations of current evidence, and make recommendations for future studies. This evidence is important in considering additional research into Mendelian causes of pregnancy loss and appropriate genetic investigations for couples experiencing recurrent pregnancy loss. SEARCH METHODS A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE (1946 to May 2018) and Embase (1974 to May 2018). The search terms ‘spontaneous abortion’, ‘miscarriage’, ‘pregnancy loss’, or ‘lethal’ were used to identify pregnancy loss terms. These were combined with search terms to identify the genetic contribution including ‘exome’, ‘human genome’, ‘sequencing analysis’, ‘sequencing’, ‘copy number variation’, ‘single-nucleotide polymorphism’, ‘microarray analysis’, and ‘comparative genomic hybridization’. Studies were limited to pregnancy loss up to 20 weeks in humans and excluded if the genetic content included genes that are not lethal in utero, PGD studies, infertility studies, expression studies, aneuploidy with no recurrence risk, methodologies where there is no clinical relevance, and complex genetic studies. The quality of the studies was assessed using a modified version of the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. OUTCOMES A total of 50 studies were identified and categorized into three themes: whole-exome sequencing studies; copy number variation studies; and other studies related to pregnancy loss including recurrent molar pregnancies, epigenetics, and mitochondrial DNA aberrations. Putatively causative variants were found in a range of genes, including CHRNA1 (cholinergic receptor, nicotinic, alpha polypeptide 1), DYNC2H1 (dynein, cytoplasmic 2, heavy chain 1), and RYR1 (ryanodine receptor 1), which were identified in multiple studies. Copy number variants were also identified to have a causal or associated link with recurrent miscarriage. WIDER IMPLICATIONS Identification of genes that are causative of or predisposing to pregnancy loss will be of significant individual patient impact with respect to counselling and treatment. In addition, knowledge of specific genes that contribute to pregnancy loss could also be of importance in designing a diagnostic sequencing panel for patients with recurrent pregnancy loss and also in understanding the biological pathways that can cause pregnancy loss.

Download Full-text