Distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicokinetics of vitexin in rats and dogs

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daopeng Tan ◽  
Geng Li ◽  
Wenying Lv ◽  
Xu Shao ◽  
Xiaoliang Li ◽  
...  

Background: Vitexin is the main bioactive compound of hawthorn (Crataegus pinnatifida), a famous traditional Chinese medicine, and vitexin for injection is currently in phase I clinical trial in China. Objective: This investigation systematically evaluated the metabolism and toxicokinetics of vitexin in rats and dogs. Methods: Rats and beagle dogs were administrated different doses of vitexin, and then the plasma concentration, tissue distribution, excretion, metabolism, pharmacokinetics and plasma protein binding were investigated. Results : The elimination half-life (t1/2) values in rats after a single intravenous dose of 3, 15 and 75 mg/kg were estimated as 43.53±10.82, 22.86±4.23, and 21.17±8.64 min, and the values of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0→∞) were 329.34±144.07, 974.79±177.27, and 5251.49±786.98 mg•min/L, respectively. The plasma protein binding rate in rats was determined as about 65% by equilibrium dialysis after 72 hr. After 24 hr of intravenous administration, 16.30%, 3.47% and 9.72% of the given dose were excreted in urine, feces and bile, respectively. The metabolites of the vitexin were hydrolyzed via deglycosylation. The pharmacokinetics of dogs after intravenous administration revealed t1/2, AUC0-∞ and mean residence time (MRT0-∞) values of 20.43±6.37 min, 227.96±26.68 mg•min/L and 17.12±4.33 min, respectively. The no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) was 50 mg/kg body weight/day. There was no significant accumulation effect at 8 or 20 mg/kg/day in dogs over 92 days of repeated administration. For the 50 mg/kg/day dose group, the exposure (AUC, Cmax) decreased significantly with prolonged administration. This trend suggests that repeated administration accelerates vitexin metabolism. Conclusion: The absorption of vitexin following routine oral administration was very low. To improve the bioavailability of vitexin, the development of an injectable formulation would be a suitable alternative choice.

1983 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beverley M. David ◽  
Rose Tjokrosetio ◽  
Kenneth F. Ilett

Xenobiotica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-81
Author(s):  
Kajal Karsauliya ◽  
Ashish Kumar Sonker ◽  
Manisha Bhateria ◽  
Isha Taneja ◽  
Anshuman Srivastava ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 97 (10) ◽  
pp. 4586-4595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel J. Waters ◽  
Rachel Jones ◽  
Gareth Williams ◽  
Bindi Sohal

2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 551-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth E. Curran ◽  
Christopher R. J. Claxton ◽  
Laura Hutchison ◽  
Paul J. Harradine ◽  
Iain J. Martin ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keizo Fukushima ◽  
Shinji Kobuchi ◽  
Masakazu Shibata ◽  
Kanji Takada ◽  
Nobuyuki Sugioka

ABSTRACT: Purpose. Many clinical reports and trials have suggested that fluvoxamine (FLV) reduces plasma lipoprotein levels. However, few studies have reported the effect of plasma lipoproteins on FLV pharmacokinetics. The aim of the present study was to investigate the affinities of FLV to plasma lipoproteins and the effect of plasma lipoproteins on the biodistribution of FLV using an experimental hyperlipidemic (HL) rat model. Methods. HL rats were prepared by intraperitoneal administration of Poloxamer-407 solution (1.0 g/kg). In vitro protein binding and distribution of FLV in plasma lipoproteins were determined in control and HL rats. In vivo pharmacokinetic study (intravenous administration of FLV, 5.0 mg/kg) and biodistribution analysis for brain and liver at a steady state (infusion, 1.5 mg/kg/hr, 6 hrs) were also performed. Results. The plasma protein binding of FLV was around 83% and 95% in control and HL rats, respectively, whereas the FLV recoveries in triglyceride-rich lipoprotein fractions were increased in HL. Therefore, the elevation of lipoproteins was likely responsible for the increase in protein binding in HL. After intravenous administration, the area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve (AUC) in HL was 3.9-fold greater than that in control rats, whereas the distribution ratio of FLV plasma concentration to the brain at a steady state was decreased to approximately 20% of that of the control. Conclusions. FLV has an affinity to plasma lipoproteins, and their elevation might decrease the FLV biodistribution to brain; the plasma lipoprotein levels could not be found to correlate positively with the FLV pharmacokinetic effect in brain, but rather may attenuate it. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see “For Readers”) may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue’s contents page.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document