Integrated Therapeutic Approaches in Head and Neck Cancer: The Importance of Multidisciplinary Team Management

2013 ◽  
Vol 999 (999) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Perri ◽  
Paolo Muto ◽  
Corrado Aversa ◽  
Antonio Daponte ◽  
Giuseppina Della Vittoria ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 834-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Perri ◽  
Paolo Muto ◽  
Corrado Aversa ◽  
Antonio Daponte ◽  
Giuseppina Vittoria ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 104 (8) ◽  
pp. 1246-1248 ◽  
Author(s):  
P L Friedland ◽  
B Bozic ◽  
J Dewar ◽  
R Kuan ◽  
C Meyer ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changyi Shang ◽  
Linfei Feng ◽  
Ying Gu ◽  
Houlin Hong ◽  
Lilin Hong ◽  
...  

Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) is one of the more common malignant tumors that threaten human health worldwide. Multidisciplinary team management (MDTM) in HNC treatment has been introduced in the past several decades to improve patient survival rates. This study reviewed the impact of MDTM on survival rates in patients with HNC compared to conventional treatment methods.Methods: Only cohort studies were identified for this meta-analysis that included an exposure group that utilized MDTM and a control group. Heterogeneity and sensitivity also were assessed. Survival rate data for HNC patients were analyzed using RevMan 5.2 software.Results: Five cohort studies (n = 39,070) that examined survival rates among HNC patients were included. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using the random effect model. The results revealed that exposure groups treated using MDTM exhibited a higher survival rate [HR = 0.84, 95% CI (0.76–0.92), P = 0.0004] with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 68%, p = 0.01). For two studies that examined the effect of MDTM on the survival rate for patients specifically with stage IV HNC, MDTM did not produce any statistically significant improvement in survival rates [HR = 0.81, 95% CI (0.59–1.10), p = 0.18].Conclusions: The application of MDTM based on conventional surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy improved the overall survival rate of patients with HNC. Future research should examine the efficacy of MDTM in patients with cancer at different stages.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. v385-v386
Author(s):  
J-B. Guy ◽  
Y. Xia ◽  
A. Vallard ◽  
S. Espenel ◽  
J-C. Trone ◽  
...  

Oral Oncology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 35-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste Guy ◽  
Marouan Benna ◽  
Yaoxiong Xia ◽  
Elisabteh Daguenet ◽  
Majed Ben Mrad ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Elloy ◽  
Sara Jarvis ◽  
Anne Davis

INTRODUCTION Rapid access to radiological services is essential, if the British Association of Otolaryngologists – Head and Neck Surgeons Minimum Temporal Standards are to be met in the management of head and neck cancer patients. This study assesses a new initiative whereby the multidisciplinary team prioritises allocated imaging appointments rather than using the traditional radiological triage system. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study was a prospective audit of all patients referred over a 3-month period with suspected head and neck cancer. The main outcome measures were: (i) median interval in days from general practitioner (GP) referral to staging scan; and (ii) median interval in days from first clinic appointment to staging scan. RESULTS The new multidisciplinary team booking system led to a statistically significant reduction in the ‘request-to-scan time’ (from 12 days to 5 days). The time from ‘GP to scan’ also improved. CONCLUSIONS This new multidisciplinary team-led booking system, could, in the future, speed up access to radiology services lead and neck cancer patients, allowing earlier definitive treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document