In Vivo Biocompatibility of Chitosan and Collagen-vitrigel Membranes for Corneal Scaffolding: A Comparative Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valdez-García Jorge E. ◽  
Mendoza Guillermo ◽  
Zavala Judith ◽  
Zavala-Pompa Angel ◽  
Brito Gabriela ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 3977
Author(s):  
Francesco Liguori ◽  
Susanna Amadio ◽  
Cinzia Volonté

Over the years, researchers have leveraged a host of different in vivo models in order to dissect amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a neurodegenerative/neuroinflammatory disease that is heterogeneous in its clinical presentation and is multigenic, multifactorial and non-cell autonomous. These models include both vertebrates and invertebrates such as yeast, worms, flies, zebrafish, mice, rats, guinea pigs, dogs and, more recently, non-human primates. Despite their obvious differences and peculiarities, only the concurrent and comparative analysis of these various systems will allow the untangling of the causes and mechanisms of ALS for finally obtaining new efficacious therapeutics. However, harnessing these powerful organisms poses numerous challenges. In this context, we present here an updated and comprehensive review of how eukaryotic unicellular and multicellular organisms that reproduce a few of the main clinical features of the disease have helped in ALS research to dissect the pathological pathways of the disease insurgence and progression. We describe common features as well as discrepancies among these models, highlighting new insights and emerging roles for experimental organisms in ALS.


2012 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. S159
Author(s):  
W.M. Dickerson ◽  
L.A. Beausang ◽  
A. Saab ◽  
K. Leong ◽  
E.M. Alderman

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 1813-1824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Mendes Nadal ◽  
Mona Lisa Simionatto Gomes ◽  
Débora Maria Borsato ◽  
Martinha Antunes Almeida ◽  
Fernanda Malaquias Barboza ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Natalya V. Krylova ◽  
Svetlana P. Ermakova ◽  
Vyacheslav F. Lavrov ◽  
Irina A. Leneva ◽  
Galina G. Kompanets ◽  
...  

Biomolecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1523
Author(s):  
Isabelle Anna Zink ◽  
Erika Wimmer ◽  
Christa Schleper

Prokaryotes are constantly coping with attacks by viruses in their natural environments and therefore have evolved an impressive array of defense systems. Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) is an adaptive immune system found in the majority of archaea and about half of bacteria which stores pieces of infecting viral DNA as spacers in genomic CRISPR arrays to reuse them for specific virus destruction upon a second wave of infection. In detail, small CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) are transcribed from CRISPR arrays and incorporated into type-specific CRISPR effector complexes which further degrade foreign nucleic acids complementary to the crRNA. This review gives an overview of CRISPR immunity to newcomers in the field and an update on CRISPR literature in archaea by comparing the functional mechanisms and abundances of the diverse CRISPR types. A bigger fraction is dedicated to the versatile and prevalent CRISPR type III systems, as tremendous progress has been made recently using archaeal models in discerning the controlled molecular mechanisms of their unique tripartite mode of action including RNA interference, DNA interference and the unique cyclic-oligoadenylate signaling that induces promiscuous RNA shredding by CARF-domain ribonucleases. The second half of the review spotlights CRISPR in archaea outlining seminal in vivo and in vitro studies in model organisms of the euryarchaeal and crenarchaeal phyla, including the application of CRISPR-Cas for genome editing and gene silencing. In the last section, a special focus is laid on members of the crenarchaeal hyperthermophilic order Sulfolobales by presenting a thorough comparative analysis about the distribution and abundance of CRISPR-Cas systems, including arrays and spacers as well as CRISPR-accessory proteins in all 53 genomes available to date. Interestingly, we find that CRISPR type III and the DNA-degrading CRISPR type I complexes co-exist in more than two thirds of these genomes. Furthermore, we identified ring nuclease candidates in all but two genomes and found that they generally co-exist with the above-mentioned CARF domain ribonucleases Csx1/Csm6. These observations, together with published literature allowed us to draft a working model of how CRISPR-Cas systems and accessory proteins cross talk to establish native CRISPR anti-virus immunity in a Sulfolobales cell.


1995 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mercè Viader ◽  
Eugènia Mato ◽  
Dolors Tugues ◽  
Oscar Fornas ◽  
Manel Puig-Domingo ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (6Part5) ◽  
pp. 2679-2679
Author(s):  
T Liu ◽  
X Li ◽  
J Zhou ◽  
W Vance ◽  
M Benson ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. e14-e23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos Motta de Freitas ◽  
Cristiano Henrique Pereira da Silva ◽  
Mario Groisman ◽  
Guaracilei Maciel Vidigal

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document