scholarly journals Role of mTOR Signaling in Tumor Cell Motility, Invasion and Metastasis

2016 ◽  
pp. 207-244
2006 ◽  
Vol 173 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weigang Wang ◽  
Ghassan Mouneimne ◽  
Mazen Sidani ◽  
Jeffrey Wyckoff ◽  
Xiaoming Chen ◽  
...  

Understanding the mechanisms controlling cancer cell invasion and metastasis constitutes a fundamental step in setting new strategies for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy of metastatic cancers. LIM kinase1 (LIMK1) is a member of a novel class of serine–threonine protein kinases. Cofilin, a LIMK1 substrate, is essential for the regulation of actin polymerization and depolymerization during cell migration. Previous studies have made opposite conclusions as to the role of LIMK1 in tumor cell motility and metastasis, claiming either an increase or decrease in cell motility and metastasis as a result of LIMK1 over expression (Zebda, N., O. Bernard, M. Bailly, S. Welti, D.S. Lawrence, and J.S. Condeelis. 2000. J. Cell Biol. 151:1119–1128; Davila, M., A.R. Frost, W.E. Grizzle, and R. Chakrabarti. 2003. J. Biol. Chem. 278:36868–36875; Yoshioka, K., V. Foletta, O. Bernard, and K. Itoh. 2003. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:7247–7252; Nishita, M., C. Tomizawa, M. Yamamoto, Y. Horita, K. Ohashi, and K. Mizuno. 2005. J. Cell Biol. 171:349–359). We resolve this paradox by showing that the effects of LIMK1 expression on migration, intravasation, and metastasis of cancer cells can be most simply explained by its regulation of the output of the cofilin pathway. LIMK1-mediated decreases or increases in the activity of the cofilin pathway are shown to cause proportional decreases or increases in motility, intravasation, and metastasis of tumor cells.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Smirnova ◽  
Jeffrey Wyckoff ◽  
Jeffrey E. Segall

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 283-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Wells ◽  
Jelena Grahovac ◽  
Sarah Wheeler ◽  
Bo Ma ◽  
Douglas Lauffenburger

BMC Cancer ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Renquan Lu ◽  
Chengsheng Wu ◽  
Lin Guo ◽  
Yingchao Liu ◽  
Wei Mo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tresa M. Elias ◽  
Danielle E. Desa ◽  
Phong K. Nguyen ◽  
Ananya Goyal ◽  
Danielle Benoit ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Second harmonic generation (SHG) is an intrinsic optical property of fibrillar collagen. SHG directionality is quantified by F/B, the ratio of forward- to backward-propagating signal, which is affected by collagen fiber internal structure, specifically the diameter, spacing, and disorder of fibrils within a collagen fiber. We have previously shown that F/B of primary invasive ductal carcinoma sections is prognostic of metastatic outcome. One possible cause of this relationship was revealed by our observation that tumor cells’ motility on collagen I gels varied when collagen fiber internal structure in those gels was manipulated. The mechanism by which tumor cells sense changes in collagen fiber internal structure remains unknown: here we evaluate the role of elastic modulus in the relationship between collagen fiber internal structure (as reported by F/B) and tumor cell motility. Methods The 4T1 murine mammary adenocarcinoma, a model of metastatic triple negative breast cancer, (TNBC) and the 67NR line, a non-metastatic luminal phenotype, were introduced to a series of collagen-polyacrylamide mixed gels wherein collagen fiber internal structure and gel elastic modulus were independently controlled. F/B was measured with SHG, while elastic modulus was measured globally via rheometry and locally via atomic force microscopy (AFM). Tumor cell motility was quantified over three hours. Results The motility of both cell lines varied with F/B while elastic modulus was held constant, and did so at two physiological modulus values. Interestingly, 4T1 cell motility increased as F/B increased, while 67NR cell motility decreased. Conclusions Our results suggest that elastic modulus does not play a significant role in the observed relationship between collagen fiber internal structure (as reported by F/B) and tumor cell motility, for two cell lines that are models of TNBC and luminal-like breast cancer. Our observation that the two lines exhibit opposite motility trends as F/B increases is consistent with the trends in metastatic outcome versus F/B observed in our published clinical data for luminal versus basal cohorts, and suggests that a tumor’s subtype may play a role in their response to collagen fiber internal structure.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tresa M. Elias ◽  
Danielle Desa ◽  
Phong Nguyen ◽  
Ananya Goyal ◽  
Danielle Benoit ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Second harmonic generation (SHG) is an intrinsic optical property of fibrillar collagen. SHG directionality is quantified by F/B, the ratio of forward- to backward-propagating signal, which is affected by collagen fiber internal structure, specifically the diameter, spacing, and disorder of fibrils within a collagen fiber. We have previously shown that F/B of primary invasive ductal carcinoma sections is prognostic of metastatic outcome. One possible cause of this relationship was revealed by our observation that tumor cells’ motility on collagen I gels varied when collagen fiber internal structure in those gels was manipulated. The mechanism by which tumor cells sense changes in collagen fiber internal structure remains unknown: here we evaluate the role of elastic modulus in the relationship between collagen fiber internal structure (as reported by F/B) and tumor cell motility. Methods: The 4T1 murine mammary adenocarcinoma, a model of metastatic triple negative breast cancer, (TNBC) and the 67NR line, a non-metastatic luminal phenotype, were introduced to a series of collagen-polyacrylamide mixed gels wherein collagen fiber internal structure and gel elastic modulus were independently controlled. F/B was measured with SHG, while elastic modulus was measured globally via rheometry and locally via atomic force microscopy (AFM). Tumor cell motility was quantified over three hours. Results: The motility of both cell lines varied with F/B while elastic modulus was held constant, and did so at two physiological modulus values. Interestingly, 4T1 cell motility increased as F/B increased, while 67NR cell motility decreased.Conclusions: Our results suggest that elastic modulus does not play a significant role in the observed relationship between collagen fiber internal structure (as reported by F/B) and tumor cell motility, for two cell lines that are models of TNBC and luminal-like breast cancer. Our observation that the two lines exhibit opposite motility trends as F/B increases is consistent with the trends in metastatic outcome versus F/B observed in our published clinical data for ER+ (i.e. containing the luminal subtypes) and ER- (i.e. containing the basal subtypes) cohorts, and suggests that a tumor’s subtype may play a role in their response to collagen fiber internal structure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document