HEAVY METAL REMOVAL FROM LEACHATES AND A GROUNDWATER BY ADSORPTION/CO-PRECIPITATION ONTO METAL-OXIDES-COATED SAND IN A FLUIDIZED REACTOR

2002 ◽  
Vol 2002 (10) ◽  
pp. 537-550
Author(s):  
Hong W. Zhao ◽  
Sun-Nan Hong ◽  
Terkel C. Christensen
2012 ◽  
Vol 211-212 ◽  
pp. 317-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Hua ◽  
Shujuan Zhang ◽  
Bingcai Pan ◽  
Weiming Zhang ◽  
Lu Lv ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 207-217
Author(s):  
Hulya Genr-Fuhrman ◽  
Peter S. Mikkelsen ◽  
Anna Ledin

In this study, several sorbents (i.e. alumina, activated bauxsol coated sand (ABCS), bark,bauxsol coated sand (BCS), fly ash (FA), granulated activated carbon (GAC), iron oxidecoated sand (IOCS), natural zeolite (NZ), sand, and spine!) are investigated with the longterm goal of developing a feasible technology for heavy metal removal during secondarytreatment of storm water. The sorbents are tested in batch tests for their As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni andZn removal efficiency from synthetic stormwater samples, where all of these metals coexisted at a starting pH of 6.5. It is found that each sorbent has different affinity to the heavymetals, with heavy metal cations (i.e. Cd, Cu, Ni and Zn) removed more effectively thanheavy metal anions (i.e. As and Cr) by all sorbents except IOCS, which has a high affinitytowards As. The results further indicated that alumina and BCS outperform the other sorbents,possibly due to high surface area of alumina and the favourable sorption sites of BCS;whereas NZ, sand and bark were the least efficient. On the other hand, although FAeffectively retained Cd, Ni and Zn, the leaching of As, Cr, and Cu is a concern.


2021 ◽  
Vol 287 ◽  
pp. 112322
Author(s):  
Morteza Nazaripour ◽  
Mir Amir Mohammad Reshadi ◽  
Seyed Ahmad Mirbagheri ◽  
Mehdi Nazaripour ◽  
Alireza Bazargan

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-57
Author(s):  
Abdullah Al-Amin ◽  
Fahmida Parvin ◽  
Joydeep Chakraborty ◽  
Yong-Ick Kim

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document