scholarly journals Comparison of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy and Dynamic Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy With Regard to Dose Distribution and Sparing of Organs at Risk

2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 349-355
Author(s):  
Yuzo HASEGAWA ◽  
Toshihiko IUCHI ◽  
Katsunobu OSATO ◽  
Takashi KODAMA ◽  
Naoki TOYAMA ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-106
Author(s):  
D. M. Trifiletti ◽  
K. Wijesooriya ◽  
G. Moyer ◽  
D. Lain ◽  
C. Geesey ◽  
...  

AbstractAimDeep inspiratory breath hold (DIBH) during left-breast irradiation helps to minimise cardiac irradiation by physically separating the heart from the left breast. The dose to organs-at-risk in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and opposed tangent three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) during DIBH in patients with left-sided breast cancer was compared.Materials and methodsA total of 20 consecutive patients with left-sided breast cancer had a computed tomography scan utilising DIBH. Mean volumes of the heart, left anterior descending coronary artery, total lung and right breast receiving 5–95% of the prescription dose were calculated.ResultsTarget volume homogeneity was improved with IMRT and average mean dose to target was higher for 3DCRT (51·03 Gy) compared with IMRT (50·47 Gy, p<0·01). The average mean dose to the heart was lower with 3DCRT (87 versus 77 cGy, p<0·01). The average mean dose to the contralateral breast was also lower with 3DCRT (19 versus 17 cGy, p<0·01). Less monitor units (MUs) were required with 3DCRT with an average difference of 225 MU/fraction (p<0·01).FindingsUnder DIBH, absolute differences between 3DCRT and IMRT were minimal. 3DCRT under DIBH provided excellent dosimetric results in most patients with left-sided breast cancer without the need for IMRT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document