Effectiveness of Augmented Reality Mobile Simulator in Teaching Local Anesthesia of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

2019 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 423-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasa Mladenovic ◽  
L.A.P. Pereira ◽  
Kristina Mladenovic ◽  
Nebojsa Videnovic ◽  
Zoran Bukumiric ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 56-59
Author(s):  
Nupur Vasava ◽  
Chintan Joshi ◽  
Vaishali Parekh

Background: It is important to control the pain associated with root canal treatment (RCT) in endodontic. Pain accompanying fear and anxiety due to endodontic treatment can be reduced by anesthetic techniques. The present study aims to compare the effect of articaine versus lidocaine local anesthesia for inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) and long buccal nerve block on pain during RCT. METHODS: Twenty patients diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of mandibular posterior tooth were selected. The patients randomly received either cartridge of lidocaine or articaine using IANB and long buccal nerve block. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of ten. Group 1: patients received IANB and long buccal nerve block 2% lidocaine with 1:100000 epinephrine. Group 2: patients received IANB and long buccal nerve block with 4% articaine with 1:100000 epinephrine. Before the Injection, the patient received all information about the visual analysis scale (VAS). Pain was evaluated using VAS scale in numberic value 1 to 10 number. The pain was evaluated at three different stages: before administration of LA, after immediate access opening, and after immediate obturation procedure. Data were analyzed using various suitable statistical tests. RESULT: The mean value of efcacy of pain before administration of local anesthesia (LA) was 8.50 ± 0.97 for lidocaine and 8.30 ± 0.48 for articaine had no signicant difference. A signicant difference was observed at two different duration after immediate access opening and after immediate obturation where articaine has a lower mean value 3.60 ± 1.08 and 1.60 ± 0.17 respectively (P>0.05) as compared to the mean value of lidocaine 4.10 ± 1.10 and 1.60 ± 0.17 respectively Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, in cases of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis articaine 4% did not alleviate pain much and showed better anesthetic efcacy than 2% lidocaine with IANB and long buccal nerve block.


2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Venkat Narayanan ◽  
Prashanthi Gurram ◽  
Radhika Krishnan ◽  
Veerabahu Muthusubramanian ◽  
V. Sadesh Kannan

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 1702-06
Author(s):  
NoorUlSabah Hussain ◽  
Shoaib Younus ◽  
Uzair Bin Akhtar ◽  
Malik Ali Hassan Sajjad ◽  
Muhammad Salman Chishty ◽  
...  

Objective: To compare the difference in pain perceived by patients undergoing intra-oral local anesthesia withdifferent gauge needles. Study Design: Qausi experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Oral and Maxillofacial surgery department of Institute of Dentistry, CombinedMilitary Hospital, Lahore Medical College, Lahore, from July 2019 to August 2019. Methodology: One hundred patients were selected by consecutive sampling from the oral surgery OPD clinic.They were divided into two groups A and B randomly. Twenty three gauge needle on a 3cc disposable syringewas used for inferior alveolar nerve block and buccal nerve block for group A and 27 gauge needle on a metaldental syringe was used for the same in group B. Patients gave a verbal pain score, from 0-10 for each injection. Results: One Hundred participants were included in study, 37 (37%) males and 63 (63%) females. Mean painscore for group A for the inferior alveolar nerve block was 4.50 ± 2.1 and group B was 3.86 ± 2. The mean painscore for the buccal nerve block in group A was 4.02 ± 1.7, while that of group B was 3.94 ± 1.8. There was nosignificant difference (p=0.167 & 0.855) in pain perceived by patients undergoing intra oral local anesthesia using needles of different gauges. Conclusion: There is no difference in pain perceived by patients undergoing intra oral local anesthesia usingneedles of different gauges.


Author(s):  
Aisha Wali ◽  
Talha Mufeed Siddiqui ◽  
Nauman Qamar ◽  
Rabia Khan ◽  
Nausheen Jawaid

ABSTRACT Pain is considered to be the major cause for seeking emergency endodontic treatment. Pain management is of vital importance in endodontics with no exception. Local anesthesia is considered to be the primary method to control pain. An effective local anesthesia cannot be obtained if pulp is inflamed. Clinician prescribes nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as premedication on a routine basis for mild to moderate pain to reduce pulpal inflammation before injecting anesthesia. These drugs are beneficial in providing relief from pain and inflammation in irreversible pulpitis and helps in providing effectiveness of inferior alveolar nerve block. Moreover, they have a short half life, which would make them ideal for a single dosage prior to the management of severe pain. Aim To conduct a randomized-placebo controlled clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of premedication with analgesics vs placebo for success of inferior alveolar nerve block in irreversible pulpitis. Materials and methods The study consisted of 80 adult patients attending operative Outpatient Department in Baqai Dental College. Informed Consent was obtained from each participant. Subjects were randomly divided in four groups comprising of 20 subjects in each group. Group A received piroxicam (Feldene 20 mg, Pfizer), group B received diclofenac potassium (Fastaid Plus, 50 mg platinum pharmaceutic), group C received naproxen sodium (Synflex 550 mg, ICI), and group D received a placebo drug becefol (Abbott). Medication was given 1 hour before initiating endodontic treatment. After 1 hour of oral administration of tablets, inferior alveolar nerve block using 1.8 ml of 2% lidocaine containing 1: 200,000 epinephrine was given. After 15 minutes, access cavity preparation was initiated and patients were asked to inform if they experienced pain. Patients were excluded from the study if they experienced pain but if the patient did not feel pain endodontic treatment was continued. p-value was set at 0.05. Data was analyzed by using Chi-square test (SPSS 19). Results The result showed that out of 80 patients who participated in the study, success rate for piroxicam came out to 90% (10 male and 8 female patients), followed by diclofenac potassium with 75% success rate (9 male and 6 female patients), naproxen sodium with 35% success rate (3 male and 4 female patients) and placebo with 10% success (1 male and 1 female patient). Conclusion The current study concludes that premedication given 1 hour before injecting anesthesia is helpful in reducing pain intensity and thus causing inferior alveolar nerve block to be effective. How to cite this article Wali A, Siddiqui TM, Qamar N, Khan R, Jawaid N. Effectiveness of Premedication with Analgesics vs Placebo for Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Irreversible Pulpitis. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2012;2(1):5-9.


2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (9) ◽  
pp. 1003-1003
Author(s):  
E Editorial

In the original article by Rasa Mladenovic, Leonardo Pereira, Filip Djordjevic, Zoran Vlahovic, Kristina Mladenovic, Andrijana Cvetkovic, Brankica Martinovic, Jovan Mladenovic, Julie Popovski. The use of mobile-aided learning in education of local anesthesia for the inferior alveolar nerve block/ Primena ucenja putem mobilnih uredjaja u edukaciji mandibularne anestezije. Vojnosanit Pregl 2020; 77(8):839-43. (https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP180622154M), the first name of the second author was misspelled as Leonardo instead of Leandro. The correct name of the second author should be Leandro Pereira, so the list of the authors should have read: Rasa Mladenovic, Leandro Pereira, Filip Djordjevic, Zoran Vlahovic, Kristina Mladenovic, Andrijana Cvetkovic, Brankica Martinovic, Jovan Mladenovic, Julie Popovski. We apologize for any inconvenience that this may have caused.<br><br><font color="red"><b> Link to the corrected article <u><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/VSP180622154M">10.2298/VSP180622154M</a></b></u>


2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (8) ◽  
pp. 839-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasa Mladenovic ◽  
Leonardo Pereira ◽  
Filip Djordjevic ◽  
Zoran Vlahovic ◽  
Kristina Mladenovic ◽  
...  

Background/Aim. Dental education has developed over the years, and various technologies have been included. Considering the fact that mobile devices are an imperative of modern time, the aim of our research was to evaluate effectiveness of Mobile-Aided Learning on practical administering the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). Methods. This prospective study involved 34 students who were randomly divided into two groups: G1 (control) group with 16 students and G2 (study) group with 18 students. Students of both groups previously successfully completed theoretical and practical training provided by the curriculum. For the purpose of additional education, students of the G2 group used a mobile application for 3D simulation of local anesthesia (Mobile-Aided Learning) outside the dental office for a period of one semester. After that, all students completed a post-clinical questionnaire. Results. The average time for performing anesthesia by participants in the G1 group was 70.54 ? 20.16 seconds, while in the G2 group it was 57.13 ? 17.45 seconds, which was significantly shorter (p ? 0.05). A successful anesthesia application was higher in the G2 group (83.3%) compared to the G1 group (75%). The results of the post-clinical test questionnaire also indicated difference in the mean values of the responses to all questions, which was in favor of the G2 group participants. Conclusion. Application of Mobile-Aided Learning showed a significantly higher efficiency in student education for practical implementation of the IANB.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document