scholarly journals Effect of Music Training on Auditory Brainstem and Middle Latency Responses

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47
Author(s):  
Chul-Hee Choi ◽  
Hea-Sung Cho
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Changes ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Training Experience ◽  
Music Training ◽  
Auditory Evoked Responses ◽  
Normal Ranges ◽  
Auditory Middle Latency Response ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Middle Latency

Purpose: The auditory system has potentials to reorganize its structure and function in response to environmental changes such as training, experience, learning, injury, and disease. This is called neuroplasticity. A typical example of neuroplasticity is the music training, which demands cognitive and neural challenges resulting in enhanced auditory perception. This study investigated the effect of music training on auditory evoked responses, particularly auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. Methods: Forty college students consisting of twenty students with music training (musicians) and twenty students without music training (non-musicians) participated in the study. All participants have normal ranges in terms of pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, and tympanometry. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) and auditory middle latency response (AMLR) from both ears were tested. Absolute latencies and amplitudes of waves in ABR and AMLR were obtained and analyzed.Results: The absolute latencies of wave I and V significantly differed between musicians and non-musicians. They were shorter for musicians than for non-musicians. Significant differences were found in the interpeak latencies of wave III-V and I-V between musicians and non-musicians. They were also shorter in musicians than for non-musicians. In addition, there were only significant differences in the latency of Na in AMLR between musicians and non-musicians. It was shorter for a musician than for non-musician.Conclusion: ABR was more sensitive to the efficacy of the music training.

Objective Assessment of Hearing in Children: Update on Procedures and Protocols

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-58
Author(s):  
James W. Hall ◽  
Anuradha R. Bantwal
Keyword(s):  
Psychosocial Development ◽  
Otoacoustic Emissions ◽  
Objective Assessment ◽  
Behavioral Assessment ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Test Battery ◽  
Auditory Evoked Responses ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Assessment Techniques ◽  
Pediatric Populations

Early identification and diagnosis of hearing loss in infants and young children is the first step toward appropriate and effective intervention and is critical for optimal communicative and psychosocial development. Limitations of behavioral assessment techniques in pediatric populations necessitate the use of an objective test battery to enable complete and accurate assessment of auditory function. Since the introduction of the cross-check principle 35 years ago, the pediatric diagnostic test battery has expanded to include, in addition to behavioral audiometry, acoustic immittance measures, otoacoustic emissions, and multiple auditory evoked responses (auditory brainstem response, auditory steady state response, and electrocochleography). We offer a concise description of a modern evidence-based audiological test battery that permits early and accurate diagnosis of auditory dysfunction.

scholarly journals Better Understanding of Direct Bone-Conduction Measurement: Comparison with Frequency-Specific Bone-Conduction Tones and Brainstem Responses

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-90
Author(s):  
Yeoju Kim ◽  
Woojae Han ◽  
Sihun Park ◽  
Sunghwa You ◽  
Chanbeom Kwak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Large Data ◽  
Tone Burst ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Low Frequencies ◽  
High Frequencies ◽  
Brainstem Response

Background and Objectives: The present study aimed to compare thresholds of direct bone-conduction (BC direct) with those of behaviorally measured BC pure-tone audiometry (PTA) and objectively measured BC auditory brainstem response (ABR) to confirm the clinical feasibility of their relationships.Subjects and Methods: Young adults with normal hearing participated in the study to determine the thresholds from three measurements at four testing frequencies. In the BC direct, the vibrator of a bone-anchored hearing aid softband was placed on the right mastoid of each subject. In both PTA and ABR, a B71 bone oscillator was placed on the subject’s right mastoid. While the subject’s thresholds of BC direct and BC PTA were determined with a clinically routine 5-dB step procedure, BC ABR was conducted to determine the individual’s hearing sensitivity by a peak V of the waveform using tone-burst and click stimuli.Results: The BC direct showed a different pattern between low and high frequencies. Precisely, its thresholds were 13.25 and 12.25 dB HL at 0.5 and 1 kHz, respectively, but 19 and 19.75 dB HL at 2 and 4 kHz, respectively. A significant positive correlation existed between BC direct and PTA at 1 kHz, which was also correlated with ABR.Conclusions: Based on the current data, the thresholds of BC direct were similar to BC PTA at low frequencies and BC ABR at high frequencies. The thresholds of BC direct might be predictable at approximately 5 dB higher (or lower) than that in PTA, although a large data set is required for standardization.

scholarly journals Audiological findings of a patient with H syndrome: case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diala Hussein ◽  
Büşra Altın ◽  
Münir Demir Bajin
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
The Right

Abstract Background H syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in SLC29A3. Hyperpigmentation, hypertrichosis, hyperglycemia, and hearing loss are some characteristics of this disorder, and it has a prevalence of < 1/1000. The aim of this report is to spread awareness among otologists, audiologists, and pediatricians about this syndrome and its audiological features. Case presentation An 8-year-old male with a diagnosed H syndrome registered to our clinic with a complaint of hearing loss. The patient was diagnosed with hearing loss in a different clinic using only the air-conducted click auditory brainstem response test which showed wave V at 60 dB nHL for the right ear and at 80 dB nHL for the left ear. The initially performed pure tone audiometry (PTA) test in our clinic revealed a bilateral asymmetric hearing loss with a moderate sensorineural hearing loss in the right ear and a profound mixed hearing loss in the left ear. The performed air conducted click auditory brainstem response (ABR) result showed wave V at 55 dB nHL for the right ear and at 70 dB nHL for the left ear. Then, the repeated PTA test revealed a mild-severe sensorineural sloping hearing loss in the right ear and a severe sensorineural hearing loss in the left ear. Conclusion Although hearing thresholds in H syndrome could be within normal limits in some patients, sensorineural hearing loss is an important characteristic feature for this syndrome. Sensorineural hearing loss could be progressive or of sudden onset and ranges from mild to profound. Thus, it must be taken into consideration to apply the audiological follow-up regularly and paying attention to the patient’s complaints; also, a regular follow-up for language development of children with H syndrome and for the hearing aids is advised.

Auditory Brainstem Response, Middle Latency Response, and Late Cortical Evoked Potentials in Children with Learning Disabilities

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (07) ◽  
pp. 367-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne C. Purdy ◽  
Andrea S. Kelly ◽  
Merren G. Davies
Keyword(s):  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Auditory Processing ◽  
Auditory Evoked Potentials ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Auditory Memory ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Responses ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cortical Responses ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Middle Latency

Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) and behavioral tests were used to evaluate auditory processing in 10 children aged 7 to 11 years who were diagnosed as learning disabled (LD). AEPs included auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), middle latency responses (MLRs), and late cortical responses (P1, N1, P2, P3). Late cortical responses were recorded using an active listening oddball procedure. Auditory processing disorders were suspected in the LD children after a psychologist found phonologic processing and auditory memory problems. A control group of 10 age- and gender-matched children with no hearing or reported learning difficulties was also tested. Teacher ratings of classroom listening and SCAN Competing Words and Staggered Spondaic Word scores were poorer in the LD children. There were minor ABR latency differences between the two groups. Wave Na of the MLR was later and Nb was smaller in the LD group. The main differences in cortical responses were that P1 was earlier and P3 was later and smaller in the LD group.

Letter to the Editor

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 949-949
Author(s):  
James W. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Impairment ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Early Identification ◽  
Universal Screening ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
National Institutes Of Health ◽  
Screening Procedure ◽  
Evoked Responses ◽  
Auditory Evoked Responses ◽  
Brainstem Response

In their recent Pediatrics artide entitled "Universal Screening for Infant Hearing Impairment: Not Simple, Not Risk-Free, Not Necessarily Beneficial, and Not Presently Justified," Bess and Paradise comment on the performance of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) as a screening procedure, and quote an estimate from the 1993 National Institutes of Health Conference Statement on Early Identification of Hearing Impairment that "for every child with significant hearing impairment, more than 100 babies are referred." Bess and Paradise then comment that "the same concerns necessarily apply to a recently devised, automated ABR instrument," and reference my Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses in support of their contention.

scholarly journals Effects of Secondhand Smoke Exposure on Hearing and Auditory Evoked Potentials, ABR and AMLR in Young Adults

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (08) ◽  
pp. 685-695
Author(s):  
Ishara Ramkissoon ◽  
Mihika Batavia
Keyword(s):  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Amplitude Ratio ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Auditory Function ◽  
Hearing Sensitivity ◽  
Middle Latency Response ◽  
Auditory Middle Latency Response ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Shs Exposure ◽  
The Right

AbstractPopulation health is impacted by environmental secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. Although the negative health effects of SHS exposure include respiratory problems in children (nonsmokers) as seen in cigarette smokers, other health impacts such as sensory function are not assumed to be the same for both passive nonsmokers and smokers. However, hearing loss was recently reported in adolescents and aging adults with SHS exposure, suggesting that SHS might impact auditory function similarly to cigarette smoking. Specific effects of SHS exposure on the central auditory system have not been fully described.To measure auditory function via pure-tone audiometry and evoked potentials in young nonsmoking adults aged 18–23 yr who reported exposure to environmental SHS.Participants were selected for the SHS-exposed (SHS-E) group first, followed by age and gender matched individuals for the SHS-unexposed (SHS-U) group. Self-reported nonsmoker status was confirmed by biochemical analysis of urine for cotinine level.Potential participants (N = 208) completed a questionnaire about health, smoking history, SHS exposure, and hearing ability. Individuals with any neurological conditions, alcohol/drug dependencies, excessive noise exposure, using certain medications, or current smokers were excluded. Twenty-two nonsmokers in excellent health consented to participate. Participants in the SHS-E group reported SHS exposure in home, work, or social settings for an extensive time period. Participants in the SHS-U group did not live with smokers and reported no SHS exposure, medication use, tinnitus, or any chemical exposures. Statistical analysis was conducted on data from 20 participants, 10 per group with a mean age of 20 yr.Participants underwent auditory procedures in one session in an IAC sound-treated room, including otoscopy, tympanometry, pure-tone threshold evaluation, auditory brainstem response per ear, and a three-channel auditory middle latency response in the right ear. The primary study outcomes were hearing thresholds measured (dB HL) at five frequencies, and evoked potential wave latencies (I, III, V, Na, Pa, Nb, Pb) and amplitudes (V–I, Na–Pa, Pa–Nb, Nb–Pb). It was hypothesized that SHS-exposed individuals would have poorer hearing sensitivity (threshold >25 dB HL) and abnormal central auditory function (longer latencies; smaller amplitudes) based on evoked potentials. Statistical analyses focused on identification of group differences in hearing and central auditory function.All participants had normal hearing sensitivity (thresholds ≤25 dB HL) with no significant group differences. The V/I amplitude ratio in the right ear was significantly decreased in SHS-exposed individuals (p < 0.05). Auditory brainstem response latencies were not significantly different between participant groups or ears. Wave Pb latency was significantly increased in SHS-exposed individuals (p < 0.01). Auditory middle latency response relative amplitudes were significantly different from each other at every electrode site (Cz, Fz, C4) but not between groups. Overall, the Na–Pa complex was highest in amplitude at all three electrode sites.This preliminary study indicated toxic effects of SHS exposure by evoked potentials with decreased V/I amplitude ratio and longer (delayed) Pb latency in young adults. Further studies should corroborate these findings to facilitate clinical recommendations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document